Literature DB >> 28242727

Models of inhibitory control.

Jeffrey D Schall1, Thomas J Palmeri2, Gordon D Logan2.   

Abstract

We survey models of response inhibition having different degrees of mathematical, computational and neurobiological specificity and generality. The independent race model accounts for performance of the stop-signal or countermanding task in terms of a race between GO and STOP processes with stochastic finishing times. This model affords insights into neurophysiological mechanisms that are reviewed by other authors in this volume. The formal link between the abstract GO and STOP processes and instantiating neural processes is articulated through interactive race models consisting of stochastic accumulator GO and STOP units. This class of model provides quantitative accounts of countermanding performance and replicates the dynamics of neural activity producing that performance. The interactive race can be instantiated in a network of biophysically plausible spiking excitatory and inhibitory units. Other models seek to account for interactions between units in frontal cortex, basal ganglia and superior colliculus. The strengths, weaknesses and relationships of the different models will be considered. We will conclude with a brief survey of alternative modelling approaches and a summary of problems to be addressed including accounting for differences across effectors, species, individuals, task conditions and clinical deficits.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  accumulator; countermanding; response inhibition; stochastic; stop signal

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242727      PMCID: PMC5332852          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  58 in total

1.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms.

Authors:  G P Band; G J van Boxtel
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

3.  Countermanding saccades: evidence against independent processing of go and stop signals.

Authors:  Jale Ozyurt; Hans Colonius; Petra A Arndt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-04

4.  Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Krista Kornylo; Natalie Dill; Melissa Saenz; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  On building a bridge between brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Controlled movement processing: superior colliculus activity associated with countermanded saccades.

Authors:  Martin Paré; Doug P Hanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Hold your horses: a dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making.

Authors:  Michael J Frank
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2006-09-01

9.  Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first.

Authors:  Brian D Corneil; James K Elsley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  31 in total

1.  Incorporating neurophysiological measures into clinical assessments: Fundamental challenges and a strategy for addressing them.

Authors:  Christopher J Patrick; William G Iacono; Noah C Venables
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-03-21

Review 2.  A Pause-then-Cancel model of stopping: evidence from basal ganglia neurophysiology.

Authors:  Robert Schmidt; Joshua D Berke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Not moving: the fundamental but neglected motor function.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Towards a unifying mechanism for cancelling movements.

Authors:  Imran Noorani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.

Authors:  Gordon Tao; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  β-Bursts Reveal the Trial-to-Trial Dynamics of Movement Initiation and Cancellation.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.

Authors:  Jakob Kaiser; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Errors in Action Timing and Inhibition Facilitate Learning by Tuning Distinct Mechanisms in the Underlying Decision Process.

Authors:  Kyle Dunovan; Timothy Verstynen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.