Literature DB >> 31748375

β-Bursts Reveal the Trial-to-Trial Dynamics of Movement Initiation and Cancellation.

Jan R Wessel1,2.   

Abstract

The neurophysiological basis of motor control is of substantial interest to basic researchers and clinicians alike. Motor processes are accompanied by prominent field potential changes in the β-frequency band (15-29 Hz): in trial-averages, movement initiation is accompanied by β-band desynchronization over sensorimotor areas, whereas movement cancellation is accompanied by β-power increases over (pre)frontal areas. However, averaging misrepresents the true nature of the β-signal. Unaveraged β-band activity is characterized by short-lasting, burst-like events, rather than by steady modulations. Therefore, averaging-based quantifications may miss important brain-behavior relationships. To investigate how β-bursts relate to movement in male and female humans (N = 234), we investigated scalp-recorded β-band activity during the stop-signal task, which operationalizes both movement initiation and cancellation. Both processes were indexed by systematic spatiotemporal changes in β-burst rates. Before movement initiation, β-bursting was prominent at bilateral sensorimotor sites. These burst-rates predicted reaction time (a relationship that was absent in trial-average data), suggesting that sensorimotor β-bursting signifies an inhibited motor system, which has to be overcome to initiate movements. Indeed, during movement initiation, sensorimotor burst-rates steadily decreased, lateralizing just before movement execution. In contrast, successful movement cancellation was signified by increased phasic β-bursting over fronto-central sites. Such β-bursts were followed by short-latency increases of bilateral sensorimotor β-burst rates, suggesting that motor inhibition can be rapidly re-instantiated by frontal areas when movements have to be rapidly cancelled. Together, these findings suggest that β-bursting is a fundamental signature of the motor system, used by both sensorimotor and frontal areas involved in the trial-by-trial control of behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Movement-related β-frequency (15-29 Hz) changes are among the most prominent features of neural recordings across species, scales, and methods. However, standard averaging-based methods obscure the true dynamics of β-band activity, which is dominated by short-lived, burst-like events. Here, we demonstrate that both movement-initiation and cancellation in humans are characterized by unique trial-to-trial patterns of β-bursting. Movement initiation is characterized by steady reductions of β-bursting over bilateral sensorimotor sites. In contrast, during rapid movement cancellation, β-bursts first emerge over fronto-central sites typically associated with motor control, after which sensorimotor β-bursting re-initiates. These findings suggest a fundamentally novel, non-invasive measure of the neural interaction underlying movement-initiation and -cancellation, opening new avenues for the study of motor control in health and disease.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; motor inhibition; movement; response inhibition; stop-signal task; β-bursts

Year:  2019        PMID: 31748375      PMCID: PMC6948942          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1887-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  75 in total

1.  Event-related beta desynchronization indicates timing of response selection in a delayed-response paradigm in humans.

Authors:  J Kaiser; N Birbaumer; W Lutzenberger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Spatiotemporal patterns of beta desynchronization and gamma synchronization in corticographic data during self-paced movement.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; B Graimann; J E Huggins; S P Levine; L A Schuh
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Lateralization of event-related beta desynchronization in the EEG during pre-cued reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Louise M F Doyle; Kielan Yarrow; Peter Brown
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The Temporal Dynamics of Response Inhibition and their Modulation by Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; René J Huster
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping.

Authors:  F Perrin; J Pernier; O Bertrand; J F Echallier
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-02

Review 6.  Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Deficits in inhibitory control and conflict resolution on cognitive and motor tasks in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ignacio Obeso; Leonora Wilkinson; Enrique Casabona; Maria Luisa Bringas; Mario Álvarez; Lázaro Álvarez; Nancy Pavón; Maria-Cruz Rodríguez-Oroz; Raúl Macías; Jose A Obeso; Marjan Jahanshahi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Terrence Sejnowski; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Release the BEESTS: Bayesian Estimation of Ex-Gaussian STop-Signal reaction time distributions.

Authors:  Dora Matzke; Jonathon Love; Thomas V Wiecki; Scott D Brown; Gordon D Logan; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-10

10.  Non-selective inhibition of inappropriate motor-tendencies during response-conflict by a fronto-subthalamic mechanism.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Darcy A Waller; Jeremy Dw Greenlee
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  27 in total

1.  The Fastest Way to Stop: Inhibitory Control and IFG-STN Hyperdirect Connectivity.

Authors:  Nandakumar S Narayanan; Jan R Wessel; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Thalamocortical Mechanisms Regulating the Relationship between Transient Beta Events and Human Tactile Perception.

Authors:  Robert G Law; Sarah Pugliese; Hyeyoung Shin; Danielle D Sliva; Shane Lee; Samuel Neymotin; Christopher Moore; Stephanie R Jones
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Dissociation of Medial Frontal β-Bursts and Executive Control.

Authors:  Steven P Errington; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A Single Mechanism for Global and Selective Response Inhibition under the Influence of Motor Preparation.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; René J Huster; Richard B Ivry; Ludovica Labruna; Mari S Messel; Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Temporal cascade of frontal, motor and muscle processes underlying human action-stopping.

Authors:  Sumitash Jana; Ricci Hannah; Vignesh Muralidharan; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation.

Authors:  Clayton P Mosher; Adam N Mamelak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Nader Pouratian; Ueli Rutishauser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Paired-pulse TMS and scalp EEG reveal systematic relationship between inhibitory GABAa signaling in M1 and fronto-central cortical activity during action stopping.

Authors:  Megan Hynd; Cheol Soh; Benjamin O Rangel; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Double-blind disruption of right inferior frontal cortex with TMS reduces right frontal beta power for action stopping.

Authors:  Kelsey K Sundby; Sumitash Jana; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.

Authors:  Cheol Soh; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.