Literature DB >> 28242726

Mechanisms of saccade suppression revealed in the anti-saccade task.

Brian C Coe1, Douglas P Munoz2.   

Abstract

The anti-saccade task has emerged as an important tool for investigating the complex nature of voluntary behaviour. In this task, participants are instructed to suppress the natural response to look at a peripheral visual stimulus and look in the opposite direction instead. Analysis of saccadic reaction times (SRT: the time from stimulus appearance to the first saccade) and the frequency of direction errors (i.e. looking toward the stimulus) provide insight into saccade suppression mechanisms in the brain. Some direction errors are reflexive responses with very short SRTs (express latency saccades), while other direction errors are driven by automated responses and have longer SRTs. These different types of errors reveal that the anti-saccade task requires different forms of suppression, and neurophysiological experiments in macaques have revealed several potential mechanisms. At the start of an anti-saccade trial, pre-emptive top-down inhibition of saccade generating neurons in the frontal eye fields and superior colliculus must be present before the stimulus appears to prevent express latency direction errors. After the stimulus appears, voluntary anti-saccade commands must compete with, and override, automated visually initiated saccade commands to prevent longer latency direction errors. The frequencies of these types of direction errors, as well as SRTs, change throughout the lifespan and reveal time courses for development, maturation, and ageing. Additionally, patients diagnosed with a variety of neurological and/or psychiatric disorders affecting the frontal lobes and/or basal ganglia produce markedly different SRT distributions and types of direction errors, which highlight specific deficits in saccade suppression and inhibitory control. The anti-saccade task therefore provides valuable insight into the neural mechanisms of saccade suppression and is a valuable tool in a clinical setting.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ageing; basal ganglia; development; frontal cortex; parietal cortex; superior colliculus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242726      PMCID: PMC5332851          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  89 in total

1.  Opposing basal ganglia processes shape midbrain visuomotor activity bilaterally.

Authors:  Huai Jiang; Barry E Stein; John G McHaffie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  Beatriz Luna; Krista E Garver; Trinity A Urban; Nicole A Lazar; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

3.  Spatial interactions in the superior colliculus predict saccade behavior in a neural field model.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Thomas P Trappenberg; Michael Dorris; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dissociating cognitive deficits involved in voluntary eye movement dysfunctions in Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Silvia C Amador; Ashley J Hood; Mya C Schiess; Robert Izor; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Age-related trends in saccade characteristics among the elderly.

Authors:  A Peltsch; A Hemraj; A Garcia; D P Munoz
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Organization of monkey superior colliculus: intermediate layer cells discharging before eye movements.

Authors:  C W Mohler; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements. I. Age-related changes in normal children.

Authors:  J Fukushima; T Hatta; K Fukushima
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Target size modulates saccadic eye movements in humans.

Authors:  Christoph J Ploner; Florian Ostendorf; Sandra Dick
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 9.  Development of eye-movement control.

Authors:  Beatriz Luna; Katerina Velanova; Charles F Geier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Altered accuracy of saccadic eye movements in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Angelina Paolozza; Rebecca Titman; Donald Brien; Douglas P Munoz; James N Reynolds
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Not moving: the fundamental but neglected motor function.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Shared variance of oculomotor phenotypes in a large sample of healthy young men.

Authors:  D Valakos; T Karantinos; I Evdokimidis; N C Stefanis; D Avramopoulos; N Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.

Authors:  Gordon Tao; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Prosaccade and Antisaccade Behavior in Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome Progression.

Authors:  Yingratana A McLennan; Matthew W Mosconi; Forrest J McKenzie; Jessica Famula; Bennet Krawchuk; Kyoungmi Kim; Courtney J Clark; David Hessl; Susan M Rivera; Tony J Simon; Flora Tassone; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Eye Tracking in Patients with Parkinson's Disease Treated with Nabilone-Results of a Phase II, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Pilot Study.

Authors:  Philipp Ellmerer; Marina Peball; Federico Carbone; Marcel Ritter; Beatrice Heim; Kathrin Marini; Dora Valent; Florian Krismer; Werner Poewe; Atbin Djamshidian; Klaus Seppi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-19

6.  Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation increases fixational saccades during movement preparation: evidence for impaired preparatory set.

Authors:  Lisa C Goelz; Maya Cottongim; Leonard Verhagen Metman; Daniel M Corcos; Fabian J David
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Voluntary saccade inhibition deficits correlate with extended white-matter cortico-basal atrophy in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Israel Vaca-Palomares; Brian C Coe; Donald C Brien; Aurelio Campos-Romo; Douglas P Munoz; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Mapping neural dynamics underlying saccade preparation and execution and their relation to reaction time and direction errors.

Authors:  Sonya Bells; Silvia L Isabella; Donald C Brien; Brian C Coe; Douglas P Munoz; Donald J Mabbott; Douglas O Cheyne
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Increased Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Amplitude Impairs Inhibitory Control of Eye Movements in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Miranda J Munoz; Lisa C Goelz; Gian D Pal; Jessica A Karl; Leo Verhagen Metman; Sepehr Sani; Joshua M Rosenow; Jody D Ciolino; Ajay S Kurani; Daniel M Corcos; Fabian J David
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2022-06-14

10.  The Stochastic Early Reaction, Inhibition, and late Action (SERIA) model for antisaccades.

Authors:  Eduardo A Aponte; Dario Schöbi; Klaas E Stephan; Jakob Heinzle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.