Literature DB >> 28242729

Abandoning and modifying one action plan for alternatives.

Joo-Hyun Song1.   

Abstract

Visual scenes are often complex and crowded with many different objects. To interact effectively, we must choose one object at a time as a goal for action. Certain external cues can act as a stop signal, quickly cancelling an ongoing action. Less recognized are internal signals. These can come from recent experience, anticipated action outcomes, cognitive states, and when attention is captured by a salient object. These signals elevate one action plan over alternatives and can quickly modify an initial choice. Here, we focus on these internal processes responsible for selecting, abandoning and modifying action plans. We first highlight how the brain resolves competition among multiple action plans. Critical is the existence of parallel motor planning processes, which allow efficient and timely changes. Then, we discuss how the action system interplays with perception, attention and memory processes to bias action selection and suppress or modify erroneous selections. Subsequently, we show how tracking the continuous modification of action trajectories can provide a tool to read out changes in internal cognitive states. Taken together, we shed light on a broader view that sensorimotor networks can continuously modify actions through simultaneous evaluation of alternative activities in concert with widely distributed perceptual and cognitive networks.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  attention; changes-of-mind; parallel processing; target selection; visually guided action

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242729      PMCID: PMC5332854          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  84 in total

1.  Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.

Authors:  Eamon Caddigan; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Correction and suppression of reaching movements in the cerebral cortex: physiological and neuropsychological aspects.

Authors:  Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Tania Buiatti; Roberto Caminiti; Stefano Ferraina; Francesco Lacquaniti; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two-dimensional arm movements: relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; R Caminiti; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceptual decision processes flexibly adapt to avoid change-of-mind motor costs.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Action plan co-optimization reveals the parallel encoding of competing reach movements.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Kathryn S Barton; Craig S Chapman; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions.

Authors:  Denis O'Hora; Rick Dale; Petri T Piiroinen; Fionnuala Connolly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Motor effort alters changes of mind in sensorimotor decision making.

Authors:  Diana Burk; James N Ingram; David W Franklin; Michael N Shadlen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural Encoding and Representation of Time for Sensorimotor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Ramesh Balasubramaniam; Saskia Haegens; Mehrdad Jazayeri; Hugo Merchant; Dagmar Sternad; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Not moving: the fundamental but neglected motor function.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; R H S Carpenter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.

Authors:  Gordon Tao; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Lost to translation: How design factors of the mouse-tracking procedure impact the inference from action to cognition.

Authors:  Tobias Grage; Martin Schoemann; Pascal J Kieslich; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Reaching movements are attracted by stimuli that signal reward.

Authors:  Tom Nissens; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.