Literature DB >> 28239489

Insights from molecular dynamics simulations for computational protein design.

Matthew Carter Childers1, Valerie Daggett1.   

Abstract

A grand challenge in the field of structural biology is to design and engineer proteins that exhibit targeted functions. Although much success on this front has been achieved, design success rates remain low, an ever-present reminder of our limited understanding of the relationship between amino acid sequences and the structures they adopt. In addition to experimental techniques and rational design strategies, computational methods have been employed to aid in the design and engineering of proteins. Molecular dynamics (MD) is one such method that simulates the motions of proteins according to classical dynamics. Here, we review how insights into protein dynamics derived from MD simulations have influenced the design of proteins. One of the greatest strengths of MD is its capacity to reveal information beyond what is available in the static structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. In this regard simulations can be used to directly guide protein design by providing atomistic details of the dynamic molecular interactions contributing to protein stability and function. MD simulations can also be used as a virtual screening tool to rank, select, identify, and assess potential designs. MD is uniquely poised to inform protein design efforts where the application requires realistic models of protein dynamics and atomic level descriptions of the relationship between dynamics and function. Here, we review cases where MD simulations was used to modulate protein stability and protein function by providing information regarding the conformation(s), conformational transitions, interactions, and dynamics that govern stability and function. In addition, we discuss cases where conformations from protein folding/unfolding simulations have been exploited for protein design, yielding novel outcomes that could not be obtained from static structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational protein design; enzyme design; molecular dynamics simulation; thermostability

Year:  2017        PMID: 28239489      PMCID: PMC5321087          DOI: 10.1039/C6ME00083E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Syst Des Eng


  204 in total

Review 1.  On the frequency of protein glycosylation, as deduced from analysis of the SWISS-PROT database.

Authors:  R Apweiler; H Hermjakob; N Sharon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-12-06

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Structural differences between mesophilic, moderately thermophilic and extremely thermophilic protein subunits: results of a comprehensive survey.

Authors:  A Szilágyi; P Závodszky
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Molecular and biotechnological aspects of xylanases.

Authors:  N Kulkarni; A Shendye; M Rao
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Protein folding and unfolding in microseconds to nanoseconds by experiment and simulation.

Authors:  U Mayor; C M Johnson; V Daggett; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Changes in the apomyoglobin folding pathway caused by mutation of the distal histidine residue.

Authors:  C Garcia; C Nishimura; S Cavagnero; H J Dyson; P E Wright
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Engineering out motion: a surface disulfide bond alters the mobility of tryptophan 22 in cytochrome b5 as probed by time-resolved fluorescence and 1H NMR experiments.

Authors:  E M Storch; J S Grinstead; A P Campbell; V Daggett; W M Atkins
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Engineering out motion: introduction of a de novo disulfide bond and a salt bridge designed to close a dynamic cleft on the surface of cytochrome b5.

Authors:  E M Storch; V Daggett; W M Atkins
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Biological properties of human prolactin analogs depend not only on global hormone affinity, but also on the relative affinities of both receptor binding sites.

Authors:  S Kinet; S Bernichtein; P A Kelly; J A Martial; V Goffin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A synthetic 70-amino acid residue analog of ribonuclease S-protein with enzymic activity.

Authors:  B Gutte
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1975-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Rational and Semirational Protein Design.

Authors:  Ivan V Korendovych
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

2.  Thermostability and Substrate Specificity of GH-11 Xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus VAPS24.

Authors:  Vishal Kumar; Puneet Kumar Singh; Pratyoosh Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Improving the Efficiency of Ligand-Binding Protein Design with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Emilia P Barros; Jamie M Schiffer; Anastassia Vorobieva; Jiayi Dou; David Baker; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Engineered control of enzyme structural dynamics and function.

Authors:  David D Boehr; Rebecca N D'Amico; Kathleen F O'Rourke
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Learning Strategies in Protein Directed Evolution.

Authors:  Xavier F Cadet; Jean Christophe Gelly; Aster van Noord; Frédéric Cadet; Carlos G Acevedo-Rocha
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Recent advances in automated protein design and its future challenges.

Authors:  Dani Setiawan; Jeffrey Brender; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.098

7.  Rigorous analysis of free solution glycosaminoglycan dynamics using simple, new tools.

Authors:  Balaji Nagarajan; Nehru Viji Sankaranarayanan; Umesh R Desai
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.313

8.  Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles.

Authors:  Matthew Carter Childers; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Biomolecular Modeling and Simulation: A Prospering Multidisciplinary Field.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Christopher G Myers; Lauren Beljak; Justin Chen; Sami Dakhel; Daniel Darling; Sayak Ghosh; Joseph Hall; Mikaeel Jan; Emily Liang; Sera Saju; Mackenzie Vohr; Chris Wu; Yifan Xu; Eva Xue
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 10.  Elucidating Solution Structures of Cyclic Peptides Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Jovan Damjanovic; Jiayuan Miao; He Huang; Yu-Shan Lin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.