Literature DB >> 35727454

Learning Strategies in Protein Directed Evolution.

Xavier F Cadet1, Jean Christophe Gelly2,3, Aster van Noord4, Frédéric Cadet5,6, Carlos G Acevedo-Rocha7.   

Abstract

Synthetic biology is a fast-evolving research field that combines biology and engineering principles to develop new biological systems for medical, pharmacological, and industrial applications. Synthetic biologists use iterative "design, build, test, and learn" cycles to efficiently engineer genetic systems that are reliable, reproducible, and predictable. Protein engineering by directed evolution can benefit from such a systematic engineering approach for various reasons. Learning can be carried out before starting, throughout or after finalizing a directed evolution project. Computational tools, bioinformatics, and scanning mutagenesis methods can be excellent starting points, while molecular dynamics simulations and other strategies can guide engineering efforts. Similarly, studying protein intermediates along evolutionary pathways offers fascinating insights into the molecular mechanisms shaped by evolution. The learning step of the cycle is not only crucial for proteins or enzymes that are not suitable for high-throughput screening or selection systems, but it is also valuable for any platform that can generate a large amount of data that can be aided by machine learning algorithms. The main challenge in protein engineering is to predict the effect of a single mutation on one functional parameter-to say nothing of several mutations on multiple parameters. This is largely due to nonadditive mutational interactions, known as epistatic effects-beneficial mutations present in a genetic background may not be beneficial in another genetic background. In this work, we provide an overview of experimental and computational strategies that can guide the user to learn protein function at different stages in a directed evolution project. We also discuss how epistatic effects can influence the success of directed evolution projects. Since machine learning is gaining momentum in protein engineering and the field is becoming more interdisciplinary thanks to collaboration between mathematicians, computational scientists, engineers, molecular biologists, and chemists, we provide a general workflow that familiarizes nonexperts with the basic concepts, dataset requirements, learning approaches, model capabilities and performance metrics of this intriguing area. Finally, we also provide some practical recommendations on how machine learning can harness epistatic effects for engineering proteins in an "outside-the-box" way.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Directed evolution; Epistasis; Hotspots; Machine learning; Protein engineering; Rational design; Saturation mutagenesis; Synthetic biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35727454     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2152-3_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  125 in total

Review 1.  Methods for the directed evolution of proteins.

Authors:  Michael S Packer; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Biocatalysis in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Need for Speed.

Authors:  Matthew D Truppo
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 3.  Protein engineers turned evolutionists-the quest for the optimal starting point.

Authors:  Devin L Trudeau; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 4.  Beyond the outer limits of nature by directed evolution.

Authors:  Patricia Molina-Espeja; Javier Viña-Gonzalez; Bernardo J Gomez-Fernandez; Javier Martin-Diaz; Eva Garcia-Ruiz; Miguel Alcalde
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 5.  Directed Evolution of CRISPR/Cas Systems for Precise Gene Editing.

Authors:  Rongming Liu; Liya Liang; Emily F Freed; Ryan T Gill
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 6.  Directed Evolution of Protein Catalysts.

Authors:  Cathleen Zeymer; Donald Hilvert
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 7.  The Growing and Glowing Toolbox of Fluorescent and Photoactive Proteins.

Authors:  Erik A Rodriguez; Robert E Campbell; John Y Lin; Michael Z Lin; Atsushi Miyawaki; Amy E Palmer; Xiaokun Shu; Jin Zhang; Roger Y Tsien
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 8.  Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution.

Authors:  Philip A Romero; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  Selection platforms for directed evolution in synthetic biology.

Authors:  Pedro A G Tizei; Eszter Csibra; Leticia Torres; Vitor B Pinheiro
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 10.  Directed evolution to improve protein folding in vivo.

Authors:  Veronika Sachsenhauser; James Ca Bardwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.