Literature DB >> 31442033

Improving the Efficiency of Ligand-Binding Protein Design with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Emilia P Barros, Jamie M Schiffer1, Anastassia Vorobieva, Jiayi Dou, David Baker, Rommie E Amaro.   

Abstract

Custom-designed ligand-binding proteins represent a promising class of macromolecules with exciting applications toward the design of new enzymes or the engineering of antibodies and small-molecule recruited proteins for therapeutic interventions. However, several challenges remain in designing a protein sequence such that the binding site organization results in high affinity interaction with a bound ligand. Here, we study the dynamics of explicitly solvated designed proteins through all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to gain insight into the causes that lead to the low affinity or instability of most of these designs, despite the prediction of their success by the computational design methodology. Simulations ranging from 500 to 1000 ns per replicate were conducted on 37 designed protein variants encompassing two distinct folds and a range of ligand affinities, resulting in more than 180 μs of combined sampling. The simulations provide retrospective insights into the properties affecting ligand affinity that can prove useful in guiding further steps of design optimization. Features indicate that entropic components are particularly important for affinity, which are not easily incorporated in the empirical models often used in design protocols. Additionally, we demonstrate that the application of machine learning approaches built upon the output from the simulations can help discriminate between successful and failed binders, such that MD could act as a screening step in protein design, resulting in a more efficient process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31442033      PMCID: PMC7532806          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  56 in total

1.  The hydrogen bond in the solid state.

Authors:  Thomas Steiner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics.

Authors:  W Humphrey; A Dalke; K Schulten
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1996-02

3.  Molecular Dynamics Fingerprints (MDFP): Machine Learning from MD Data To Predict Free-Energy Differences.

Authors:  Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Improving stability of nitrile hydratase by bridging the salt-bridges in specific thermal-sensitive regions.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Huimin Yu; Changchun Liu; Jie Liu; Zhongyao Shen
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  De Novo-Designed α-Helical Barrels as Receptors for Small Molecules.

Authors:  Franziska Thomas; William M Dawson; Eric J M Lang; Antony J Burton; Gail J Bartlett; Guto G Rhys; Adrian J Mulholland; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 6.  Protein design: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Lynne Regan; Diego Caballero; Michael R Hinrichsen; Alejandro Virrueta; Danielle M Williams; Corey S O'Hern
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 7.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get".

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; Lane Votapka; Jesper Sørensen; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Design of a hyperstable 60-subunit protein dodecahedron. [corrected].

Authors:  Yang Hsia; Jacob B Bale; Shane Gonen; Dan Shi; William Sheffler; Kimberly K Fong; Una Nattermann; Chunfu Xu; Po-Ssu Huang; Rashmi Ravichandran; Sue Yi; Trisha N Davis; Tamir Gonen; Neil P King; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Computational design of trimeric influenza-neutralizing proteins targeting the hemagglutinin receptor binding site.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Strauch; Steffen M Bernard; David La; Alan J Bohn; Peter S Lee; Caitlin E Anderson; Travis Nieusma; Carly A Holstein; Natalie K Garcia; Kathryn A Hooper; Rashmi Ravichandran; Jorgen W Nelson; William Sheffler; Jesse D Bloom; Kelly K Lee; Andrew B Ward; Paul Yager; Deborah H Fuller; Ian A Wilson; David Baker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  6 in total

1.  A defined structural unit enables de novo design of small-molecule-binding proteins.

Authors:  Nicholas F Polizzi; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Recognition of quinolone antibiotics by the multidrug efflux transporter MexB of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Silvia Gervasoni; Giuliano Malloci; Andrea Bosin; Attilio V Vargiu; Helen I Zgurskaya; Paolo Ruggerone
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.945

Review 3.  The stability and dynamics of computationally designed proteins.

Authors:  Natali A Gonzalez; Brigitte A Li; Michelle E McCully
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.952

4.  Water Networks and Correlated Motions in Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) Are Critical for Allosteric Inhibitor Binding and Activity.

Authors:  Jennifer M Chambers; Wade Miller; Giovanni Quichocho; Viraj Upadhye; Diego Avellaneda Matteo; Andrey A Bobkov; Christal D Sohl; Jamie M Schiffer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  New computational protein design methods for de novo small molecule binding sites.

Authors:  James E Lucas; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Multiple reactivities of flavonoids towards pathological elements in Alzheimer's disease: structure-activity relationship.

Authors:  Geewoo Nam; Mannkyu Hong; Juri Lee; Hyuck Jin Lee; Yonghwan Ji; Juhye Kang; Mu-Hyun Baik; Mi Hee Lim
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 9.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.