| Literature DB >> 28231166 |
Leila Bennamoun1, Serge Hiligsmann2, Scheherazad Dakhmouche3, Amel Ait-Kaki4, Fatima-Zohra Kenza Labbani5, Tahar Nouadri6, Zahia Meraihi7, Benedetta Turchetti8, Pietro Buzzini9, Philippe Thonart10.
Abstract
Polygalacturonase is a valuable biocatalyst for several industrial applications. Production of polygalacturonase using the Aureobasidium pullulans stain isolated from Saharan soil of Algeria was investigated. Its capacity to produce polygalacturonase was assessed under submerged culture using tomato pomace as an abundant agro-industrial substrate. Optimization of the medium components, which enhance polygalacturonase activity of the strain Aureobasidium pullulans, was achieved with the aid of response surface methodology. The composition of the optimized medium was as follows: tomato pomace 40 g/L, lactose 1.84 g/L, CaCl₂0.09 g/L and pH 5.16. Practical validation of the optimum medium provided polygalacturonase activity of 22.05 U/mL, which was 5-fold higher than in unoptimized conditions. Batch cultivation in a 20 L bioreactor performed with the optimal nutrients and conditions resulted in a high polygalacturonase content (25.75 U/mL). The enzyme showed stability over a range of temperature (5-90 °C) with an optimum temperature of 60 °C with pH 5.0, exhibiting 100% residual activity after 1h at 60 °C. This enzyme was stable at a broad pH range (5.0-10). The enzyme proved to be an exo-polygalacturonase, releasing galacturonic acid by hydrolysis of polygalacturonic acid. Moreover, the exo-polygalacturonase was able to enhance the clarification of both apple and citrus juice. As a result, an economical polygalacturonase production process was defined and proposed using an industrial food by-product.Entities:
Keywords: Aureobasidium pullulans; characterization; exo-polygalacturonase; response surface methodology; tomato pomace
Year: 2016 PMID: 28231166 PMCID: PMC5302420 DOI: 10.3390/foods5040072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Range of different variables studied in the Plackett–Burman design (PBD).
| Variables | Variable Code | Low Level (−1) | Low Level (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | X1 | 5 | 6 |
| Lactose | X2 | 0% | 1% |
| Error | X3 | - | - |
| Glucose | X4 | 0% | 1% |
| Error | X5 | - | - |
| CaCl2 | X6 | 0 g/L | 0.125 g/L |
| Yeast extract | X7 | 0% | 0.2% |
Plackett-Burman design (PBD) of variables (in coded levels) with polygalacturonase (PG) activity as response.
| Run Order | Experimental Values | PG Activity (U/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | ||
| 1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 7.67 ± 0.12 |
| 2 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 7.82 ± 0.09 |
| 3 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 3.84 ± 0.15 |
| 4 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 4.55 ± 0.11 |
| 5 | +1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 4.08 ± 0.10 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 4.13 ± 0.14 |
| 7 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 5.61 ± 0.12 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 4.13 ± 0.12 |
Experimental codes, ranges and levels of the independent variables for response surface methodological experiments.
| Variables | Symbols | Coded Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −α (−1.68) | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α (+1.68) | ||
| pH | X1 | 5.16 | 5.5 | 6 | 6.5 | 6.84 |
| Lactose (%) | X2 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.84 |
| CaCl2 (g/L) | X3 | 0.0205 | 0.0375 | 0.0625 | 0.0875 | 0.104 |
Effects of the variables and statistical analysis of the Plackett-Burman design (PBD).
| Variables | Effect | Coef. | SE Coef. | Confidence Level (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 5.2275 | 0.1044 | 50.05 | 0.000 | ‒ | |
| pH | 1.2490 | 0.6245 | 0.1044 | 5.98 | 0.027 b | 97.3 |
| Lactose | 2.3700 | 1.1850 | 0.1044 | 11.53 | 0.008 b | 99.2 |
| Glucose | 0.3620 | 0.1810 | 0.1044 | 1.73 | 0.225 a | 77.5 |
| CaCl2 | −1.4160 | −0.7080 | 0.1044 | −6.78 | 0.021 c | 97.9 |
| Yeast extract | −0.2870 | −0.1435 | 0.1044 | −1.37 | 0.303 a | 69.7 |
Predicted-R2 = 0.8527; Adjusted-R2 = 0.9908. Coef.: coefficient; SE coef.: standard error coefficient; t-value: Student’s test value; p-value: probability value; a Non-significant at p < 0.05; b Significant positive effect; c Significant negative effect.
Central composite design for the experimental and the corresponding responses to potentiation of PG activity.
| Run Order | Coded Levels | Y Response (PG Activity) (U/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | Experimental Value | Predicted Value | |
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 10.76 ± 0.09 | 11.18 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 10.42 ± 0.07 | 10.16 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 14.16 ± 0.03 | 15.16 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 11.50 ± 0.03 | 11.62 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 10.42 ± 0.10 | 10.62 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 11.50 ± 0.07 | 10.81 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 17.96 ± 0.11 | 18.53 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16.31 ± 0.06 | 16.21 |
| 9 | –1.682 | 0 | 0 | 17.35 ± 0.06 | 15.77 |
| 10 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 | 12.16 ± 0.09 | 12.96 |
| 11 | 0 | –1.682 | 0 | 9.20 ± 0.10 | 9.54 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 | 18.22 ± 0.11 | 17.42 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | –1.682 | 10.42 ± 0.03 | 9.80 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 | 13.03 ± 0.09 | 13.18 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.27 ± 0.06 | 15.16 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.97 ± 0.06 | 14.31 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.16 ± 0.06 | 14.31 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the parameters of response surface methodology fitted to quadratic polynomial model for optimization of potentiation of PG activity.
| Source | SS | DF | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 124.887 | 9 | 13.8763 | 12.66 | 0.001 |
| Residual error | 7.674 | 7 | 1.0963 | ||
| Lackoffit | 7.346 | 6 | 1.2244 | 3.73 | 0.377 |
| Pure error | 0.328 | 1 | 0.3281 | ||
| Total | 132.561 | 16 |
R2 = 94.21%; Adjusted-R2 = 86.77%; Predicted-R2 = 85.58%; SS, sum of squares; DF, degree of freedom; MS, mean square; R2: coefficient of determination.
Results of regression analysis of the second-order polynomial model for optimization of potentiation of PG activity.
| Factors | Coefficient | Estimated Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 14.315 | 0.676 | 27.17 | 0.000 |
| X1 | −1.402 | 0.463 | −3.03 | 0.019 |
| X2 | 3.938 | 0.476 | 8.27 | 0.000 |
| X3 | 1.691 | 0.476 | 3.55 | 0.009 |
| X12 | 0.052 | 0.959 | 0.05 | 0.958 |
| X22 | −0.834 | 0.919 | −0.91 | 0.394 |
| X32 | −2.819 | 0.919 | −3.07 | 0.018 |
| X1X2 | −1.78 | 1.04 | −1.71 | 0.132 |
| X1X3 | 0.86 | 1.04 | 0.82 | 0.439 |
| X2X3 | 2.78 | 1.04 | 2.66 | 0.033 |
Figure 1Parity plot showing the distribution of experimental data versus predicted value by the model for potentiation of PG activity.
Figure 2Response surface graphs of potentiation of PG activity by Aureobasidium pullulans showing the effect of variables of (a) Lactose–CaCl2, (b) pH–CaCl2, and (c) pH–Lactose.
Figure 3Potentiation of PG activity in shake flasks (a) and a laboratory bioreactor (b) by A. pullulans. The results were presented as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 4Effect of pH on the activity (A) and stability (B) of PG of A. pullulans isolated strain. Each point represents the mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation.
Figure 5Effect of temperatures on the activity (A) and stability (B) of PG from A. pullulans isolated strain. Each point represents the mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation.
Figure 6Thin layer chromatography of the reaction products of polygalacturonic acid hydrolyzed by PG. Hydrolysis times were 30 min and 6 h. Standard was 10 g/L of monogalacturonic acid.
Figure 7(A) Reduction of the haze of fresh citrus juice by CE (crude extracellular enzymes from A. pullulans); C: without treatment (considered as “control”); (B) Reduction of the haze of fresh apple juice by CE (crude extracellular enzymes from A. pullulans); C: without treatment (considered as “control”).
(A) Effect of crude enzyme on the clarification rate of citrus juice. The reducing sugars, the volume and A420 were measured in the supernatant and the dry weight in the pellet, after centrifugation of treated citrus juice; (B) Effect of crude enzyme on the clarification rate of apple juice. The reducing sugars, the volume and A420 were measured in the supernatant and the dry weight in the pellet, after centrifugation of treated apple juice.
| ( | ||
| Reducing sugars (mg/mL) | 4.7 ± 0.010 | 11.22 ± 0.049 |
| Volume of supernatant (mL) | 2.5 ± 0.000 | 4.000 ± 0.000 |
| Dry weight (g) | 1.250 ± 0.003 | 0.150 ± 0.045 |
| A420 | 1.6 ± 0.002 | 0.739 ± 0.01 |
| ( | ||
| Reducing sugars (mg/mL) | 95.07 ± 0.115 | 115.00 ± 0.045 |
| Volume of supernatant (mL) | 1.0 ± 0.000 | 4.000 ± 0.000 |
| Dry weight (g) | 2.0 ± 0.055 | 0.126 ± 0.008 |
| A420 | 1.8 ± 0.520 | 0.553 ± 0.111 |