Cristina Russo1,2, Maíra I Souza Carneiro1, Nadia Bolognini1,3, Felipe Fregni2. 1. Department of Psychology and NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, Milan, Italy. 2. Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Laboratory of Neuropsychology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico, Via Mercalli, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The safety, painless, and tolerability features of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have prompted the research on the therapeutic effects of this technique in stroke; however, an in-depth and unarguable examination of the adverse effects of tDCS in stroke patients is still lacking. This review analyzes the reported adverse effects in stroke, looking for factors that may induce side-effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of articles published from 1998 to 2015 describing tDCS application in stroke patients performed through data extraction from MEDLINE/PubMed database. RESULTS: Only 11.62% of published papers reported the occurrence of tDCS adverse effects in stroke patients. The most common was itching (70%), followed by burning sensation (40%), headache (40%), tingling (30%), sleepiness (20%), difficulty of concentration, mild fatigue, skin redness, and dizziness (10%). No significant difference was found between studies "Reporting" vs. "Non-reporting" adverse effects regarding tDCS parameters (intensity, current density, duration of stimulation, and number of sessions). CONCLUSION: In the majority of stroke patients, tDCS did not induce any severe adverse effect. Regrettably, many published papers did not provide a careful description of exclusion criteria, nor a systematic report of side effects. Our work emphasizes the need of a more meticulous description of the adopted exclusion criteria and of the induced adverse effects, in order to optimize the therapeutic use of tDCS and to better delineate its safety parameters in stroke.
OBJECTIVES: The safety, painless, and tolerability features of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have prompted the research on the therapeutic effects of this technique in stroke; however, an in-depth and unarguable examination of the adverse effects of tDCS in stroke patients is still lacking. This review analyzes the reported adverse effects in stroke, looking for factors that may induce side-effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of articles published from 1998 to 2015 describing tDCS application in stroke patients performed through data extraction from MEDLINE/PubMed database. RESULTS: Only 11.62% of published papers reported the occurrence of tDCS adverse effects in stroke patients. The most common was itching (70%), followed by burning sensation (40%), headache (40%), tingling (30%), sleepiness (20%), difficulty of concentration, mild fatigue, skin redness, and dizziness (10%). No significant difference was found between studies "Reporting" vs. "Non-reporting" adverse effects regarding tDCS parameters (intensity, current density, duration of stimulation, and number of sessions). CONCLUSION: In the majority of stroke patients, tDCS did not induce any severe adverse effect. Regrettably, many published papers did not provide a careful description of exclusion criteria, nor a systematic report of side effects. Our work emphasizes the need of a more meticulous description of the adopted exclusion criteria and of the induced adverse effects, in order to optimize the therapeutic use of tDCS and to better delineate its safety parameters in stroke.
Authors: Ulrich Palm; Daniel Keeser; Christina Schiller; Zoe Fintescu; Michael Nitsche; Eva Reisinger; Frank Padberg Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Friedhelm C Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Alvero Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni; Winston D Byblow; Cathrin M Buetefisch; John Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2008-10-09 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Jung Mi Jo; Yun-Hee Kim; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Suk Hun Ohn; Bohyun Joen; Kwang Ho Lee Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Marianna Semprini; Matteo Laffranchi; Vittorio Sanguineti; Laura Avanzino; Roberto De Icco; Lorenzo De Michieli; Michela Chiappalone Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Georgia H O'Leary; Dorothea D Jenkins; Patricia Coker-Bolt; Mark S George; Steve Kautz; Marom Bikson; Bernadette T Gillick; Bashar W Badran Journal: Prog Brain Res Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Bernadette T Gillick; Andrew M Gordon; Tim Feyma; Linda E Krach; Jason Carmel; Tonya L Rich; Yannick Bleyenheuft; Kathleen Friel Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 3.418