Literature DB >> 17452283

Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients.

Csaba Poreisz1, Klára Boros, Andrea Antal, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

Cortical excitability changes induced by tDCS and revealed by TMS, are increasingly being used as an index of neuronal plasticity in the human cortex. The aim of this paper is to summarize the partially adverse effects of 567 tDCS sessions over motor and non-motor cortical areas (occipital, temporal, parietal) from the last 2 years, on work performed in our laboratories. One-hundred and two of our subjects who participated in our tDCS studies completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire contained rating scales regarding the presence and severity of headache, difficulties in concentrating, acute mood changes, visual perceptual changes and any discomforting sensation like pain, tingling, itching or burning under the electrodes, during and after tDCS. Participants were healthy subjects (75.5%), migraine patients (8.8%), post-stroke patients (5.9%) and tinnitus patients (9.8%). During tDCS a mild tingling sensation was the most common reported adverse effect (70.6%), moderate fatigue was felt by 35.3% of the subjects, whereas a light itching sensation under the stimulation electrodes occurred in 30.4% of cases. After tDCS headache (11.8%), nausea (2.9%) and insomnia (0.98%) were reported, but fairly infrequently. In addition, the incidence of the itching sensation (p=0.02) and the intensity of tingling sensation (p=0.02) were significantly higher during tDCS in the group of the healthy subjects, in comparison to patients; whereas the occurrence of headache was significantly higher in the patient group (p=0.03) after the stimulation. Our results suggest that tDCS applied to motor and non-motor areas according to the present tDCS safety guidelines, is associated with relatively minor adverse effects in healthy humans and patients with varying neurological disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17452283     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  285 in total

1.  Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial.

Authors:  Angela Valle; Suely Roizenblatt; Sueli Botte; Soroush Zaghi; Marcelo Riberto; Sergio Tufik; Paulo S Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009

2.  Cutaneous perception during tDCS: role of electrode shape and sponge salinity.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Brain Stimulation and the Role of the Right Hemisphere in Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Neurostimulation in Alzheimer's disease: from basic research to clinical applications.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Frediano Tezzon; Monica Christova; Kerstin Schwenker; Stefan Golaszewski; Eugen Trinka; Francesco Brigo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Improvement of spatial tactile acuity by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Patrick Ragert; Yves Vandermeeren; Mickael Camus; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  What does the ratio of injected current to electrode area tell us about current density in the brain during tDCS?

Authors:  Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Paula Faria; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Hyochol Ahn; Adam J Woods; Mark E Kunik; Abhishek Bhattacharjee; Zhiguo Chen; Eunyoung Choi; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a tool for the measurement of bi-hemispheric transcranial electric stimulation effects on primary motor cortex metabolism.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Vincent Beaulé; Sébastien Proulx; Louis-Philippe Lafleur; Julien Doyon; Małgorzata Marjańska; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of primary progressive aphasia: An open-label pilot study.

Authors:  Felix Gervits; Sharon Ash; H Branch Coslett; Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  The effects of lithium chloride and cathodal/anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on conditional fear memory changes and the level of p-mTOR/mTOR in PFC of male NMRI mice.

Authors:  Mojgan Hamdami; Solmaz Khalifeh; Nida Jamali-Raeufy; Mohammad Nasehi
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.