Literature DB >> 24148111

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review.

Jodie Marquez1, Paulette van Vliet, Patrick McElduff, Jim Lagopoulos, Mark Parsons.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation has been gaining increasing interest as a potential therapeutic treatment in stroke recovery. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to collate the available evidence in adults with residual motor impairments as a result of stroke. The primary outcome was change in motor function or impairment as a result of transcranial direct current stimulation, using any reported electrode montage, with or without adjunct physical therapy. The search yielded 15 relevant studies comprising 315 subjects. Compared with sham, cortical stimulation did not produce statistically significant improvements in motor performance when measured immediately after the intervention (anodal stimulation: facilitation of the affected cortex: standardized mean difference = 0.05, P = 0.71; cathodal stimulation: inhibition of the nonaffected cortex: standardized mean difference = 0.39, P = 0.08; bihemispheric stimulation: standardized mean difference = 0.24, P = 0.39). When the data were analyzed according to stroke characteristics, statistically significant improvements were evident for those with chronic stroke (standardized mean difference = 0.45, P = 0.01) and subjects with mild-to-moderate stroke impairments (standardized mean difference = 0.37, P = 0.02). Transcranial direct current stimulation is likely to be effective in enhancing motor performance in the short term when applied selectively to patients with stroke. Given the range of stimulation variables and heterogeneous nature of stroke, this modality is still experimental and further research is required to determine its clinical merit in stroke rehabilitation.
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain; electric stimulation; intervention; rehabilitation; stroke; therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24148111     DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  47 in total

1.  A Review of Brain Stimulation Treatments for Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumberger; Jonathan H Hsu; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-28

2.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  A combined therapeutic approach in stroke rehabilitation: A review on non-invasive brain stimulation plus pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Carolina Perez; Leon Morales-Quezada; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Int J Neurorehabil       Date:  2014-11-15

4.  Reply: Congenital mirror movements: lack of decussation of pyramids Mirror movement: from physiopathology to treatment perspectives.

Authors:  Cecile Gallea; Traian Popa; Sabine Meunier; Emmanuel Roze
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose-Response Relationship.

Authors:  Pratik Y Chhatbar; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Steven Kautz; Mark S George; Robert J Adams; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Distinct behavioral response of primary motor cortex stimulation in itch and pain after burn injury.

Authors:  Aurore Thibaut; Emily A Ohrtman; Leon Morales-Quezada; Laura C Simko; Colleen M Ryan; Ross Zafonte; Jeffrey C Schneider; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Consensus statement on current and emerging methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Authors:  Ainslie Johnstone; Jacob M Levenstein; Emily L Hinson; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jessica M Pisegna; Asako Kaneoka; William G Pearson; Sandeep Kumar; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a tool for the measurement of bi-hemispheric transcranial electric stimulation effects on primary motor cortex metabolism.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Vincent Beaulé; Sébastien Proulx; Louis-Philippe Lafleur; Julien Doyon; Małgorzata Marjańska; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.