Literature DB >> 28211881

A technician-delivered 'virtual clinic' for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals.

A Kotecha1,2, J Brookes1, P J Foster1,2.   

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of a technician-delivered glaucoma referral triaging service with 'virtual review' of resultant data by a consultant ophthalmologist.Patients and methodsThe Glaucoma Screening Clinic reviewed new optometrist or GP-initiated glaucoma suspect referrals into a specialist ophthalmic hospital. Patients underwent testing by three ophthalmic technicians in a dedicated clinical facility. Data were reviewed at a different time and date by a consultant glaucoma ophthalmologist. Approximately 10% of discharged patients were reviewed in a face-to-face consultant-led clinic to examine the false-negative rate of the service.ResultsBetween 1 March 2014 and 31 March 2016, 1380 patients were seen in the clinic. The number of patients discharged following consultant virtual review was 855 (62%). The positive predictive value of onward referrals was 84%. Three of the 82 patients brought back for face-to-face review were deemed to require treatment, equating to negative predictive value of 96%.ConclusionsOur technician-delivered glaucoma referral triaging clinic incorporates consultant 'virtual review' to provide a service model that significantly reduces the number of onward referrals into the glaucoma outpatient department. This model may be an alternative to departments where there are difficulties in implementing optometrist-led community-based referral refinement schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28211881      PMCID: PMC5518844          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  34 in total

1.  The projected increase in glaucoma due to an ageing population.

Authors:  Maurice W Tuck; Ronald Pitts Crick
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of the effectiveness of two enhanced glaucoma referral schemes.

Authors:  David J Parkins; David F Edgar
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Repeatability and comparison of clinical techniques for anterior chamber angle assessment.

Authors:  Peter Campbell; Tony Redmond; Rishi Agarwal; Lewis R Marshall; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 5.  False-negative results in screening programmes: systematic review of impact and implications.

Authors:  M P Petticrew; A J Sowden; D Lister-Sharp; K Wright
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service.

Authors:  N Devarajan; G S Williams; M Hopes; D O'Sullivan; D Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  There is a trend for the diagnosis of glaucoma to be made at an earlier stage in 2010 compared to 2008 in Oxford, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Yasmin Riaz; Robert M J Purbrick; John F Salmon
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme.

Authors:  Jonathan Keenan; Humma Shahid; Rupert R Bourne; Andrew J White; Keith R Martin
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Service innovation in glaucoma management: using a Web-based electronic patient record to facilitate virtual specialist supervision of a shared care glaucoma programme.

Authors:  Heathcote R Wright; Jeremy P Diamond
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Rizwan Malik; Helen Baker; Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  13 in total

1.  A renaissance of teleophthalmology through artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Edward Korot; Edward Wood; Adam Weiner; Dawn A Sim; Michael Trese
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The COVID-19 pandemic will redefine the future delivery of glaucoma care.

Authors:  Hari Jayaram; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Gus Gazzard
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Differences in Tertiary Glaucoma Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Aaron Y Lee; Cecilia S Lee; Matthew Pieters; April Y Maa; Glenn Cockerham; Mary G Lynch
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Glaucoma Community Care: Does Ongoing Shared Care Work?

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Elizabeth Wong; Jessie Huang; Michael Yapp; Katherine Masselos; Michael Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Ophthalmic photographer virtual clinics in medical retina.

Authors:  Abdul R El-Khayat; Rossella Anzidei; Vasileios Konidaris
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Expanding the role of medical retina virtual clinics using multimodal ultra-widefield and optical coherence tomography imaging.

Authors:  Jing Xian Lee; Vina Manjunath; S James Talks
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-15

7.  Two-year outcomes of a pilot glaucoma suspect telemedicine monitoring program.

Authors:  Bobeck S Modjtahedi; Katherine Chu; Tiffany Q Luong; Chunyi Hsu; Cynthia Mattox; Paul P Lee; Mamdouh L Nakla; Donald S Fong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-17

8.  The advantages of intermediate-tier, inter-optometric referral of low risk pigmented lesions.

Authors:  Angelica Ly; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Michael Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Commentary: Artificial intelligence - A game changer.

Authors:  Ashish Ahuja; Dheeraj Kewlani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Diagnose Glaucoma and Detect Glaucoma Progression: Translation to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Anna S Mursch-Edlmayr; Wai Siene Ng; Alberto Diniz-Filho; David C Sousa; Louis Arnold; Matthew B Schlenker; Karla Duenas-Angeles; Pearse A Keane; Jonathan G Crowston; Hari Jayaram
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.