Literature DB >> 30128546

Differences in Tertiary Glaucoma Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Aaron Y Lee1,2, Cecilia S Lee1, Matthew Pieters3, April Y Maa3,4, Glenn Cockerham5, Mary G Lynch3,4.   

Abstract

Importance: Glaucoma is a common cause of visual impairment in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, but to our knowledge, no data exist concerning tertiary glaucoma care (ie, laser and filtering surgery). Objective: To determine whether the rate of tertiary glaucoma care differs among veterans cared for through the 4 different eye care delivery models that are present in the VA: optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, clinics with optometry and ophthalmology functioning as a single integrated clinic with ophthalmology as the lead, and clinics with optometry and ophthalmology functioning as separate clinics. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective review of the Veterans Health Administration Support Service Center database, 490 926 veterans with a glaucoma-related diagnosis received care from 136 VA medical centers during fiscal year 2016. Demographic and baseline clinical factors, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes, and the rates of glaucoma surgery procedures were extracted from the database. The organizational structure of each VA eye clinic was obtained. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed for log percent for laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), laser trabeculoplasty (LTP), and filtering surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of LPI, LTP, and filtering surgery.
Results: Of the 490 926 veterans with a glaucoma-related diagnosis, 465 842 (94.9%) were male, 309 677 (63.1%) were white, and 203 243 (41.4%) were aged 65 to 74 years. The rate of LPI was 0.30%, 0.28%, 0.67%, and 0.69% in optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, integrated clinics, and separated clinics, respectively (P < .001). The rate of LTP was 0.31%, 1.06%, 0.93%, and 0.92% in care delivery models that included optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, integrated clinics, and separated clinics, respectively (P < .001). The rate of filtering surgery was 0.32%, 0.51%, 0.69%, and 0.60% in optometry-only clinics, ophthalmology-only clinics, integrated clinics, and separated clinics, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate regression analyses showed that these differences remained significantly different even after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions and Relevance: Disparities exist in the use of tertiary glaucoma services within the VA, and different care delivery models may play a role. Outcomes of glaucoma care for the different models of eye care delivery were not analyzed in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30128546      PMCID: PMC6224299          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  15 in total

1.  Early Experience with Technology-Based Eye Care Services (TECS): A Novel Ophthalmologic Telemedicine Initiative.

Authors:  April Y Maa; Barbara Wojciechowski; Kelly J Hunt; Clara Dismuke; Jason Shyu; Rabeea Janjua; Xiaoqin Lu; Charles M Medert; Mary G Lynch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Y H Kwon; C S Kim; M B Zimmerman; W L Alward; S S Hayreh
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Evaluating Access to Eye Care in the Contiguous United States by Calculated Driving Time in the United States Medicare Population.

Authors:  Cecilia S Lee; Aneesha Morris; Russell N Van Gelder; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  The Local Availability of Eye Care Providers and the Vision Health of Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Diane M Gibson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.648

5.  A technician-delivered 'virtual clinic' for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals.

Authors:  A Kotecha; J Brookes; P J Foster
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Use of Various Glaucoma Surgeries and Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries from 1994 to 2012.

Authors:  Karun S Arora; Alan L Robin; Kevin J Corcoran; Suzanne L Corcoran; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Agreement between specially trained and accredited optometrists and glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J R Marks; A K Harding; R A Harper; E Williams; S Haque; A F Spencer; C Fenerty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The cost of glaucoma care provided to Medicare beneficiaries from 2002 to 2009.

Authors:  Harry A Quigley; Sandra D Cassard; Emily W Gower; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Henry D Jampel; David S Friedman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Global rates of glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison of Outcomes of Laser Trabeculoplasty Performed by Optometrists vs Ophthalmologists in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Peter Y Zhao; Chris Andrews; Gregory L Skuta
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.