Literature DB >> 28204745

EFFECTIVE DOSE PER UNIT KERMA-AREA PRODUCT CONVERSION FACTORS IN ADULTS UNDERGOING MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDIES.

Heather Shaw Bonilha1, Janina Wilmskoetter1, Sameer V Tipnis2, Bonnie Martin-Harris3, Walter Huda4.   

Abstract

This study presents an investigation of adult effective dose (E) per unit Kerma-Area Product (KAP) in Modified Barium Swallow Study (MBSS) examinations. PC program for X-ray Monte Carlo (version 2.0.1) was used to calculate patient organ doses during MBSS examinations, which used combined to generate effective dose. Normalized patient doses were obtained by dividing the effective dose (mSv) by the incident KAP (Gy·cm2). Five standard projections were studied and the importance of X-ray beam size and in patient size (body mass index) were investigated. Lateral projections had an average E/KAP conversion factor of 0.19 ± 0.04 mSv/Gy·cm2. The average E/KAP was highest for upper gastrointestinal (GI) anterior-posterior projections (0.27 ± 0.04 mSv/Gy·cm2) and lowest for upper GI posterior-anterior projections (0.09 ± 0.03 mSv/Gy·cm2). E/KAP always increased with increasing filtration and/or X-ray tube voltage. Reducing the X-ray beam cross-sectional area increased the E/KAP conversion factors. Small patients have the E/KAP conversion factors that are twice those of a standard adult. Conversion factors for effective dose of adult patients undergoing MBSS examinations must account for X-ray beam projection, beam quality (kV and filtration), image size and patient size.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28204745      PMCID: PMC5927331          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  13 in total

1.  Clinical utility of the modified barium swallow.

Authors:  B Martin-Harris; J A Logemann; S McMahon; M Schleicher; J Sandidge
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Swallowing disorders.

Authors:  E Domenech; J Kelly
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Estimating cancer risks to adults undergoing body CT examinations.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Wenjun He
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Is energy imparted a good measure of the radiation risk associated with CT examinations?

Authors:  W Huda
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Prevalence and associated factors of dysphagia in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Yeon-Hwan Park; Hae-Ra Han; Byung-Mo Oh; Jinyi Lee; Ji-ae Park; Su Jeong Yu; HeeKyung Chang
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.361

Review 7.  Management of acid-related disorders in patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Colin W Howden
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-09-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure.

Authors:  W Huda; K R Peters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair.

Authors:  Stephen Balter; John W Hopewell; Donald L Miller; Louis K Wagner; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.

Authors:  Hai Yao; Walter Huda; Eugene Mah; Wenjun He
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 0.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Walter Huda; Janina Wilmskoetter; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Sameer V Tipnis
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Relationships Between Radiation Exposure Dose, Time, and Projection in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Janina Wilmskoetter; Sameer Tipnis; Janet Horn; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Walter Huda
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 3.  Radiation Exposure to Staff and Patient During Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies and Recommended Protection Strategies.

Authors:  Victoria Jean Earl; Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  A Tutorial on Diagnostic Benefit and Radiation Risk in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies.

Authors:  Harry R Ingleby; Heather S Bonilha; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Radiation Effective Doses to Adults Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Sameer V Tipnis; Walter Huda; Janina Wilmskoetter; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Heather Shaw Bonilha
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 6.  Radiation exposure in modified barium swallow studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Ashli K O'Rourke; Sameer V Tipnis
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.814

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.