Literature DB >> 21926419

Estimating cancer risks to adults undergoing body CT examinations.

Walter Huda1, Wenjun He.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to estimate cancer risks from the amount of radiation used to perform body computed tomography (CT) examination. The ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator was used to compute values of organ doses for adult body CT examinations. The radiation used to perform each examination was quantified by the dose-length product (DLP). Patient organ doses were converted into corresponding age and sex dependent cancer risks using data from BEIR VII. Results are presented for cancer risks per unit DLP and unit effective dose for 11 sensitive organs, as well as estimates of the contribution from 'other organs'. For patients who differ from a standard sized adult, correction factors based on the patient weight and antero-posterior dimension are provided to adjust organ doses and the corresponding risks. At constant incident radiation intensity, for CT examinations that include the chest, risks for females are markedly higher than those for males, whereas for examinations that include the pelvis, risks in males were slightly higher than those in females. In abdominal CT scans, risks for males and female patients are very similar. For abdominal CT scans, increasing the patient age from 20 to 80 resulted in a reduction in patient risks of nearly a factor of 5. The average cancer risk for chest/abdomen/pelvis CT examinations was ∼26 % higher than the cancer risk caused by 'sensitive organs'. Doses and radiation risks in 80 kg adults were ∼10 % lower than those in 70 kg patients. Cancer risks in body CT can be estimated from the examination DLP by accounting for sex, age, as well as patient physical characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21926419     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  8 in total

1.  CT radiation dose reduction: can we do harm by doing good?

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Radiation risks associated with serial imaging in colorectal cancer patients: should we worry?

Authors:  Jeong Suk Oh; Jonathan B Koea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  EFFECTIVE DOSE PER UNIT KERMA-AREA PRODUCT CONVERSION FACTORS IN ADULTS UNDERGOING MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDIES.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Janina Wilmskoetter; Sameer V Tipnis; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Walter Huda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Retrospective cohort study on clinical predictors for acute abnormalities on CT scan in adult patients with abdominal pain.

Authors:  Hady Zgheib; Cynthia Wakil; Sami Shayya; Mohamad Kanso; Ralph Bou Chebl; Rana Bachir; Mazen El Sayed
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-01-27

6.  Optimization of computed tomography (CT) arthrography of hip for the visualization of cartilage: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Paolo Simoni; Pierre-Philippe Leyder; Adelin Albert; Françoise Malchair; Carole Maréchal; Laura Scarciolla; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Victoria Alvarez Miezentseva; Philippe Gillet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Patient radiation biological risk in computed tomography angiography procedure.

Authors:  M Alkhorayef; E Babikir; A Alrushoud; H Al-Mohammed; A Sulieman
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Individual Calculation of Effective Dose and Risk of Malignancy Based on Monte Carlo Simulations after Whole Body Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Markus Kopp; Tobias Loewe; Wolfgang Wuest; Michael Brand; Matthias Wetzl; Wolfram Nitsch; Daniela Schmidt; Michael Beck; Bernhard Schmidt; Michael Uder; Matthias May
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.