Literature DB >> 31112653

Relationships Between Radiation Exposure Dose, Time, and Projection in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies.

Heather Shaw Bonilha1,2, Janina Wilmskoetter1, Sameer Tipnis3, Janet Horn1, Bonnie Martin-Harris4, Walter Huda5.   

Abstract

Purpose Clinicians are trained to rely on radiation exposure time as an indicator of patient radiation exposure in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies (VFSSs). However, it has been shown in other medical uses of fluoroscopy that dose area product (DAP), the amount of radiation delivered to the patient, is a better indicator of overall patient radiation exposure than radiation exposure time. This study sought to understand the relationship of DAP in VFSSs with radiation exposure time and projection used (lateral vs. posterior-anterior [PA]). Method DAP, radiation exposure time, and projection were recorded in 200 adults undergoing clinically indicated VFSSs conducted in accordance with the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile guidelines. Data were analyzed using Spearman correlation and related sample Wilcoxon test. Results DAP and radiation exposure time did not correlate significantly in the lateral or upper PA projections. DAP was significantly higher in the PA compared to lateral projection (p < .01); however, time was shorter in PA versus lateral (p < .01). The average mGy-cm2 per second was 7 for lateral projections, 14 for upper PA projections, 17 for middle PA projections, and 34 for lower PA projections. Conclusions Radiation exposure time and DAP do not strongly correlate across VFSSs. Specifically, this means that 1 patient can have a low radiation exposure time with a high DAP relative to another person with a higher radiation exposure time but a lower DAP. The results of this study question the common clinical practice of using time (specifically the 5-min indicator) as a threshold for radiation exposure during a VFSSs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31112653      PMCID: PMC6802925          DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radiation protection of medical staff.

Authors:  John Le Heron; Renato Padovani; Ian Smith; Renate Czarwinski
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Kerma-area product in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Walter Huda; Janina Wilmskoetter; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Sameer V Tipnis
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel.

Authors:  L Brateman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  EFFECTIVE DOSE PER UNIT KERMA-AREA PRODUCT CONVERSION FACTORS IN ADULTS UNDERGOING MODIFIED BARIUM SWALLOW STUDIES.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Janina Wilmskoetter; Sameer V Tipnis; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Walter Huda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment--MBSImp: establishing a standard.

Authors:  Bonnie Martin-Harris; Martin B Brodsky; Yvonne Michel; Donald O Castell; Melanie Schleicher; John Sandidge; Rebekah Maxwell; Julie Blair
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Radiation dose descriptors: BERT, COD, DAP, and other strange creatures.

Authors:  Edward L Nickoloff; Zheng Feng Lu; Ajoy K Dutta; James C So
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  The Neglected Side of the Coin: Quantitative Benefit-risk Analyses in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Pat B Zanzonico
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  The videofluorographic swallowing study.

Authors:  Bonnie Martin-Harris; Bronwyn Jones
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing impairments: their association and the predictive value of the modified barium swallow impairment profile and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Jessica L Gullung; Elizabeth G Hill; Donald O Castell; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Radiation Use and Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Adult Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Cheri L Canon; Ashli O'Rourke; Sameer Tipnis; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  Visualizing the Esophagus During Modified Barium Swallow Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erin L Reedy; Teri Lynn Herbert; Heather Shaw Bonilha
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Radiation Effective Doses to Adults Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Sameer V Tipnis; Walter Huda; Janina Wilmskoetter; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Heather Shaw Bonilha
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 4.  Best Practices in Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Authors:  Bonnie Martin-Harris; Cheri L Canon; Heather Shaw Bonilha; Joseph Murray; Kate Davidson; Maureen A Lefton-Greif
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  Radiation exposure in modified barium swallow studies.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Bonnie Martin-Harris; Ashli K O'Rourke; Sameer V Tipnis
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.814

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.