Apoorv Gupta1,2, Irene M Brockman Reizman3, Christopher R Reisch3, Kristala L J Prather2,3. 1. Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (SynBERC), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
Metabolic engineering of microorganisms to produce desirable products on an industrial scale can result in unbalanced cellular metabolic networks that reduce productivity and yield. Metabolic fluxes can be rebalanced using dynamic pathway regulation, but few broadly applicable tools are available to achieve this. We present a pathway-independent genetic control module that can be used to dynamically regulate the expression of target genes. We apply our module to identify the optimal point to redirect glycolytic flux into heterologous engineered pathways in Escherichia coli, resulting in titers of myo-inositol increased 5.5-fold and titers of glucaric acid increased from unmeasurable to >0.8 g/L, compared to the parent strains lacking dynamic flux control. Scaled-up production of these strains in benchtop bioreactors resulted in almost ten- and fivefold increases in specific titers of myo-inositol and glucaric acid, respectively. We also used our module to control flux into aromatic amino acid biosynthesis to increase titers of shikimate in E. coli from unmeasurable to >100 mg/L.
Metabolic engineering of microorganisms to produce desirable products on an industrial scale can result in unbalanced cellular metabolic networks that reduce productivity and yield. Metabolic fluxes can be rebalanced using dynamic pathway regulation, but few broadly applicable tools are available to achieve this. We present a pathway-independent genetic control module that can be used to dynamically regulate the expression of target genes. We apply our module to identify the optimal point to redirect glycolytic flux into heterologous engineered pathways in Escherichia coli, resulting in titers of myo-inositol increased 5.5-fold and titers of glucaric acid increased from unmeasurable to >0.8 g/L, compared to the parent strains lacking dynamic flux control. Scaled-up production of these strains in benchtop bioreactors resulted in almost ten- and fivefold increases in specific titers of myo-inositol and glucaric acid, respectively. We also used our module to control flux into aromatic amino acid biosynthesis to increase titers of shikimate in E. coli from unmeasurable to >100 mg/L.
Metabolic engineering manipulates cellular metabolism of microbes to maximize production of value-added products. Heterologous pathways compete with cellular metabolism, limiting product yields and affecting cell growth. Several approaches have been used to optimally alter steady-state flux distributions[1,2]; however, traditional strategies such as gene knockouts, expression level tuning, and protein engineering cannot address challenges associated with more complex pathways and products[3], where it may be necessary to modify metabolic behavior during the course of a production run. Examples include pathways that interfere with host metabolism by depleting essential metabolite pools[4], have branchpoints with promiscuous enzymes[5], or synthesize toxic intermediates or products[6]. In such cases, it may prove advantageous to downregulate competing essential pathways or delay expression of engineered pathway enzymes until midway through the cultivation. Such flux control may allow substrate pools to accumulate and then be siphoned into the engineered pathway, analogous to the “just-in-time transcription” prevalent in natural systems[7].Engineered strains that can self-regulate and redirect pathway fluxes could maximize yields and minimize the need for human supervision of fermentations. Several genetic circuits for dynamic pathway regulation have been designed, e.g., to produce lycopene[8], amorphadiene[9] and lysine[10]. Most of these circuits have pathway-specific parts, such as metabolite-responsive transcription factors or riboswitches, limiting their use in other pathways and hosts. Broadly applicable circuits should be portable across contexts[11] and designed with industry in mind. Moreover, inducers, especially physiologically-active small molecules, are prohibited in most bioprocesses because they add costs in downstream processing[12,13]. Although semi-autonomous, generalized strategies for dynamic flux regulation have been reported[14,15], no fully autonomous pathway-independent regulation modules have been constructed to systematically evaluate performance improvements and process robustness, with consideration for industrial applicability.Endogenous gene expression levels, especially for essential pathway genes, are often low and tightly regulated, so that any perturbation of protein levels that results from swapping native and heterologous parts to institute dynamic control may not be tolerated by a host cell[16-18]. Thus, genetic circuits targeting such genes must enable precise tunability of expression and impose a minimal metabolic burden on the cell. To create a pathway-independent, inducer and intervention-free genetic device to dynamically control endogenous gene expression without imposing a metabolic burden on the host, we turned to quorum sensing circuitry.Quorum sensing (QS) functions to control cell-density dependent processes in bacteria, and has been applied for induction of recombinant proteins[15], control of lysis[19] and balancing of multiple cell populations[20]. Specific small molecule signals accumulate in cell populations and induce QS circuits and the genes that they control. We used parts of the Esa QS system from Pantoea stewartii[21] to create circuit variants that switch off gene expression at desired times and cell densities. Integration of these circuits into the Escherichia coli genome enabled dynamic control of endogenous essential genes in glycolysis and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis which compete with bioproduction of glucaric acid and shikimic acid. We applied our QS-based circuit to restrict flux through endogenous pathways and siphon carbon substrate into the desired product. Increases in production of myo-inositol and glucaric acid of up to 5.5-fold and 4-fold, respectively, and improved shikimic acid titers from unmeasurable quantities up to >100 mg/L were achieved.
Results
Characterization of QS-based autonomous induction
The transcriptional regulator, EsaRI70V, binds the P promoter in the absence of 3-oxohexanoyl-homoserine lactone (AHL)[21] and activates transcription (Fig. 1A). Accumulation of AHL occurs as it is produced by the AHL synthase, EsaI, eventually leading to disruption of EsaRI70V binding and deactivation of the P promoter. By varying the expression level of EsaI, which changed the AHL accumulation rate, we created a library of circuit variants to trigger down-regulation of the P promoter at variable times and cell densities over the course of a fermentation. Pre-characterized promoter and ribosome binding sites (RBS) from Mutalik et al[22] were combinatorially assembled to scan a large expression space and achieve a spectrum of EsaI expression levels (Supplementary Table 1). Such tuning capabilities permit the discovery and implementation of pathway-specific optimal switching times.
Figure 1
Characterization of a QS-circuit to dynamically modulate a target gene of interest (GOI). (a) Schematic of the engineered circuit containing a library of promoter and RBS combinations to vary EsaI expression and AHL production rate, and differentially trigger downregulation of any GOI. Stronger EsaI expression leads to earlier downregulation of the GOI. QS circuit components (esaI, esaR170V) are integrated in the genome. All promoter/RBS combinations utilized to drive esaI are described in Supplementary Table 1. (b) Representative fluorescence profiles for all strains containing GFP under control of the QS-circuit. Switching time and rate vary among strains containing different EsaI expression cassettes. GFP is carried on a medium-copy plasmid to elicit sufficient fluorescence for detection. Fluorescence profiles for all 31 strains tested are depicted, with strain numbers indicated for clearly distinguishable profiles. (c) Switching OD for all strains containing GFP under the control of the QS circuit. Switching OD was determined by ascertaining the cell density at the point of maximum fluorescence for a given strain. Constitutive GFP expression in the absence of EsaI (AG2681, green bar), basal GFP expression in the wild-type MG1655 host without the QS circuit (+ GFP, right red bar), and wildtype MG1655 alone (MG1655, left red bar) were also tested. Switching OD for all strains was plotted against predicted strength of the corresponding promoter-RBS combination driving esaI, obtained from Mutalik et al[22] (Supplementary Table 1) (left inset). All strains with corresponding EsaI cassettes were also rank-ordered based on the measured switching OD (actual rank, early to late switching), and were compared to their corresponding place in the rank-ordered list of switching times based on predicted EsaI strengths from Mutalik et al[22] (predicted rank, high to low expression) (right inset). The ranks predicted from switching OD correlated well with the previously predicted ranks, with less agreement at lower ranks (higher EsaI strengths, earlier switching times). Error bars indicate s.d. of triplicate cultures.
This system can be used to dynamically downregulate expression of any gene of interest by placing the gene downstream of the P promoter. Degradation tags were added at the C-termini of target peptides to ensure short half-lives of transcribed proteins. The degradation tag provides an additional control mechanism for modulating protein pools and pathway fluxes in the cell. To characterize circuit behaviors and relative switching times, esaRI70V was inserted in the genome of E. coli MG1655 under a constitutive promoter from the BioFAB library (apFAB104)[23], yielding strain AG2681. esaI was subsequently integrated into a combinatorial library of promoter and RBS variants to produce a 28-strain series (named “LXX” in Supplementary Table 2) with a range of AHL production rates. A P promoter driving Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) expression on a medium copy plasmid (pCOLA-PesaS-GFP(LVA)) was then introduced into the LXX strain series, (Supplementary Table 3), yielding a range of rates at which GFP is switched off. Our attempts to use genomically integrated GFP driven by P resulted in inadequate fluorescence for characterization studies. However, for subsequent pathway-relevant targets in this study, all parts of the circuit, including the P promoter driving the gene of interest, were genomically integrated.Continuous fluorescence measurements of the LXX strain series produced a variety of switching times (Fig. 1B and 1C). Strain AG2681 had the highest peak fluorescence, as GFP was constitutively expressed due to the absence of EsaI and AHL production; however, the inclusion of the degradation tag eventually led to a decay profile similar to that seen in those strains producing AHL as this strain neared stationary phase and naturally attenuated protein production. To compare switching rates in the various strains, the cell density corresponding to the time of maximum GFP fluorescence was determined and denoted as the “switching OD.” Generally, as the predicted strength of promoter-RBS combinations[22] driving esaI increased, peak GFP fluorescence and switching OD decreased as switching occurred earlier. To confirm consistency with the predicted order of strength, strains were rank ordered based on observed switching times and compared with the predicted order of strength of the various EsaI cassettes (Fig. 1C insets). Surprisingly, circuit switching seemed highly sensitive to EsaI expression, such that most promoter-RBS combinations led to very low peak GFP and switching ODs (Fig. 1C). Only the weakest predicted combinations showed notable delays in GFP knockdown. This indicates that very low expression levels of EsaI and AHL production are needed for this system to switch, even when placed in the genome. The relative trends of switching times observed through GFP characterization matched well with the previously reported order, indicating consistency and reliability in performance of our circuit and its constituent parts.
Dynamic gene modulation to control glycolytic flux
Given the LXX series of characterized circuit variants, we applied this module to control fluxes in relevant bioproduction pathways. In engineered E. coli, a useful node for controlling fluxes in primary metabolism is the metabolic branch point at glucose-6-phosphate (G6P, Fig. 2A). G6P can be routed into native metabolism through both glycolysis and the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), as well as into heterologous production of myo-inositol (MI) via myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase (INO1) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae[24]. MI can be further converted into other useful products, such as glucaric acid, a biopolymer precursor[25], and scyllo-inositol, which has been studied as a therapeutic for Alzheimer’s[26]. The pathway for glucaric acid has been engineered in E. coli[4] and theoretical yields of almost 100% are possible; however, G6P is directed into this pathway at the expense of central carbon metabolism. The relative kinetic efficiency between the competing enzymatic branches determines the split of G6P flux in wild-type strains, as well as the potential improvement in MI and glucaric acid titers with dynamic down-regulation of native metabolic flux. A mathematical model was built using published in vitro kinetic data and information on AHL production dynamics to simulate a QS-based autonomous valve that downregulates glycolytic flux during fermentation (Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Table 4).
Figure 2
QS-based valve controlling Pfk-1 expression regulates cell growth and flux into central carbon metabolism. All circuit elements are genomically integrated. (a) G6P flux is split between three possible branches that include (1) glycolysis, (2) pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and (3) MI production through a heterologous pathway. Pgi is a reversible enzyme that converts G6P to fructose-6-phosphate (F6P). Pfk-1 catalyzes an irreversible reaction to direct flux further down glycolysis, and was the gene of interest for dynamic control. Zwf is the entry-point into the PPP and is deleted from our strains, while INO1 is the first step towards heterologous formation of MI from G6P. (b) Growth profiles show that strains with higher EsaI expression grow slower. Relative expression strengths for the strains are provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. IB2275 does not grow as well and shows a lower final OD600. (c) Pfk-1 activity profiles in crude lysates indicate that weaker EsaI expression generally trends with slower decrease in activity over time. IB2275 and IB1379 showed constitutive activity levels over all time points. EsaI-containing strains displayed high Pfk-1 activities initially, but eventually decreased to below the levels in IB1379. Data are also provided in tabular format (Supplementary Table 5). Error bars denote s.d. of triplicate cultures.
As phosphofructokinase 1 (Pfk-1; corresponding gene locus denoted as pfkA) was previously validated as an effective flux control point in upper glycolysis[17], it was chosen as the target gene for dynamic downregulation. A balance between the length of the “growth mode” (high Pfk-1 activity and glycolytic flux) and “production mode” (low Pfk-1 activity and glycolytic flux) is predicted to boost MI titers in a defined medium with glucose as the sole carbon source (Supplementary Fig. 1). If knockdown in Pfk-1 activity occurs too fast due to rapid AHL production, titers are suboptimal because growth arrest occurs too early and biomass levels are too low. On the other hand, if knockdown in Pfk-1 occurs too late, the duration of the “production” mode is too short to allow high titers.To experimentally implement dynamic transcriptional control of Pfk-1 and control glycolytic flux, zwf was deleted to prevent flux into the pentose phosphate pathway, thereby restricting G6P flux between glycolysis and MI production. All parts of the circuit were genomically integrated. The native promoter of pfkA was replaced with the P promoter in the native genomic locus, and a standard SsrA degradation tag (AADENYALAA, “LAA”) was appended to the C-terminus of the protein to enable rapid removal when transcription has been halted. esaRI70V was inserted in the genome under the control of the previously used constitutive promoter (apFAB104)[23], and the final resulting strain was designated IB2275 (Supplementary Table 2). This strain constitutively expressed Pfk-1 from P due to the absence of EsaI and AHL production. In order to allow autonomous downregulation of Pfk-1, esaI was inserted in the genome under the control of a subset of the aforementioned expression library (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Strains were characterized in minimal medium with glucose as the sole carbon source, thereby coupling Pfk-1 expression and glycolytic flux to cell growth.A spectrum of growth and Pfk-1 knockdown profiles was obtained (Fig. 2B and 2C). With weaker EsaI expression, the dynamic decay in Pfk-1 activity was slower. As seen in the GFP characterization, however, only the weakest promoter and RBS combinations allowed sufficient delay in Pfk-1 knockdown and growth arrest. Promoter-RBS combinations stronger than L24 prevented sufficient growth in minimal medium as Pfk-1 activity presumably decayed too quickly. Thus, in order to allow enough biomass to build up, and allow switching to occur at an intermediate point in the fermentation, EsaI expression must be low. Switching times in these strains were further elucidated with plasmid-based P-GFP(LVA) using the same analysis procedures as the initial circuit characterization (Supplementary Fig. 2). It should be noted that Pfk-1 expression under the P promoter is much higher than from the wildtype promoter, as seen by the differences in activity between IB2275 (P driving pfkA) and IB1379 (pfkA under its native promoter; Fig. 2C and Supplementary Table 5). However, when esaI is inserted into IB2275, the Pfk-1 activity ultimately drops below the constitutive wildtype level of IB1379. Thus, the P promoter has very strong “on” and “off” modes, making it suitable for dynamic pathway flux regulation. The library containing EsaI variants comprises a set of strains to enable switching from “growth mode” to “production mode” at different rates in a completely autonomous fashion. The strains can be used to explore trade-offs between yield and titers, thereby allowing the point of maximum productivity to be achieved for any given target product compound branching off from central carbon metabolism.
Optimal strain for myo-inositol and glucaric acid production
With successful autonomous control of growth using components of the Esa QS system, the strain series with variable Pfk-1 switching times was applied to improve production of commercially interesting compounds, such as MI and glucaric acid. As described previously, MI branches from glycolysis at the G6P branchpoint and can subsequently be converted to glucaric acid (Fig. 2A). For MI production, strains were transformed with pTrc-INO1[4] (Supplementary Table 3) and tested to determine if switching increases MI titers. Production tests were conducted in MOPS minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose as the sole carbon source. Not surprisingly, MI production was very poor in IB2275, given its poor growth profile and high Pfk-1 activity (Supplementary Fig. 3). However, MI production could be recovered back to levels equal to or above those in the wildtype IB1379 strain through EsaI expression and control of Pfk-1 activity. Pfk-1 activity profiles for the various EsaI-expressing strains (L24S, L30S, L19S, L25S, L31S) trended consistently with the initial characterization of the GFP library: stronger EsaI expression led to a faster decline in Pfk-1 activity (Supplementary Fig. 3). Further, a boost in MI titers over IB1379 was obtained with an intermediate AHL production rate, as predicted by simulations (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. 1). Strain L19S exhibited a 20% increase in titer and yield, suggesting that it was able to balance growth and production by decreasing glycolytic flux at a more suitable switching time.
Figure 3
Functionality of QS-based dynamic regulation in multiple culture media. (a) Endpoint MI titers in MOPS minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose plotted against Pfk-1 activity at a given time (14 hrs post inoculation). An optimum, which yields a 20% titer boost over IB1379, appears that correlates to the most suitable EsaI expression strength (L19S). Corresponding Pfk-1 activity profiles are provided in Supplementary Figure 3. (b) MI titers from production trials in MOPS minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and 0.2% casamino acids. Maximum titer was higher than in medium without casamino acids, with a maximum titer boost of 83% from the best strain (L19S) over IB1379. Pfk-1 activity profiles are provided in Supplementary Figure 4A. (c) Endpoint MI and acetate titers in T12 medium containing 10 g/L glucose. Strains that dynamically downregulated Pfk-1 faster led to no acetate accumulation and resulted in higher titers (L24S and L19S) with neutral culture pH. Strains with no dynamic downregulation (IB2275 and IB1379) or a very slow decline in Pfk-1 activity (L31S) led to high acetate production, low MI titers and low pH at the end of the batch culture. Pfk-1 activity profiles are provided in Supplementary Figure 4B. *p < 0.05 relative to titers from IB1379 in a two-tailed t-test. Error bars denote s.d. of triplicate cultures.
MOPS-based minimal media are used for characterization studies, but scale-up to industrial-scale production will require media formulations tailored to the target pathway and engineered strain. Since previous studies have shown that genetic devices can fail in different growth medium[27], we explored the utility of our device in two additional media. In the first case, MOPS-based minimal medium containing 10 g/L glucose was supplemented with 0.2% casamino acids. Pfk-1 activity profiles again showed that stronger EsaI expression leads to faster activity decline and growth arrest (Supplementary Fig. 4A). In addition, measurement of mRNA levels verified that transcriptomic trends were consistent with enzymatic activity data for Pfk-1 (Supplementary Fig. 5). MI titers and yields again showed that L19S performed best and led to an 83% improvement over IB1379 (Fig. 3B).We next evaluated strain performance in T12 medium, a phosphate-buffered formulation supplemented with yeast extract and soy peptone that has been developed for industrial bioproduction of glucaric acid[28]. T12 allows faster growth and consumption of glucose, suggesting that it may enable further increases in productivity for a given batch-time compared to MOPS minimal medium. Interestingly, in this medium, substantial production of acetate was observed in strains in which Pfk-1 was either constitutively expressed (IB2275 and IB1379) or suppressed too late (L31S) (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 4B). Despite the buffering capacity of the medium, the production of excessive acetate due to overflow metabolism led to a decrease in culture pH (pH~5.5) and premature growth arrest. Surprisingly, this was also true for the wild-type strain IB1379 in which basal Pfk-1 activity is considerably lower than in the QS-based IB2275, indicating that even the low wildtype Pfk-1 levels are severely suboptimal in constitutive mode for product formation branching from glycolysis. On the other hand, strains L19S and L24S were able to suppress Pfk-1 activity earlier, resulting in no acetate surplus by the end of the fermentation and maintenance of neutral pH. These strains had a significantly higher MI production, with L24S and L19S giving ~3.6-fold and ~5.5-fold boosts, respectively, in endpoint MI titers and yields over IB1379 (Fig. 3C). Thus, a dynamic strategy was critical to obtain notable titers of MI in a rich medium formulation. MI yields in all cases were proportional to titers as all starting glucose was consumed (Supplementary Fig. 6).Next, glucaric acid production in the presence of dynamic flux control was evaluated, which requires two further enzymatic steps downstream of MI (Fig. 4A). The first is mediated by myo-inositol oxygenase (MIOX) to produce glucuronic acid, followed by uronate dehydrogenase (Udh) to make glucaric acid[4]. Relevant strains (L24GA, L19GA, L31GA and IB1379GA) were prepared from L24S, L19S, L31S and IB1379 by inserting the λDE3 lysogen to allow T7-based expression of pathway enzymes, and deleting the uxaC and gudD genes to prevent consumption of glucaric acid or the intermediate, glucuronic acid (Supplementary Table 2). Glucaric acid production from glucose has been poor in wild-type K strains, with titers <0.1 g/L[28,29]. Fermentations were carried out in T12 medium which has been developed for industrial bioproduction of glucaric acid[28]. The IB1379GA control strain with Pfk-1 under the wildtype constitutive promoter showed no detectable production of glucaric acid and instead accumulated acetate (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, our best engineered strain, L19GA, produced titers up to ~0.85 g/L with minimal acetate accumulation. Similar to MI production in T12 medium, when Pfk-1 activity was not suppressed early enough or was constitutive (L31GA and IB1379GA), acetate accumulation and low culture pH was observed. In this case, the effect on product titers and yields was even more drastic than during MI production (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. 7), suggesting that dynamic control is vital.
Figure 4
Glucaric acid production using the QS valve at the G6P branchpoint. (a) Schematic of the glucaric acid production pathway from the G6P branchpoint. MI is converted to glucuronic acid by MIOX, which is then converted to glucaric acid by Udh. uxaC and gudD encode native E. coli enzymes that metabolize glucuronic and glucaric acid, respectively, and were deleted to prevent unwanted metabolite consumption. The first step of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), zwf, was also deleted. (b) Glucaric acid and acetate production in strains with varying EsaI expression cassettes. The best producer of glucaric acid is L19GA, which had previously shown the best MI production. With slower (L31GA) or no (IB1379GA) Pfk-1 downregulation, high acetate but no glucaric acid was detected, as seen previously with MI production in T12 medium. Error bars denote s.d. of triplicate cultures.
Scalability for Industrial Application
Although small-scale shake flask cultures were promising, evaluation of our QS-based strategy in more industrially relevant process development conditions, such as in a stirred-tank bioreactor, is important to justify the potential of this approach for commercial applications[27]. Bioreactors allow for more consistent culture conditions due to improved mixing and implementation of environmental setpoints such as dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH.Preliminary trials of MI production in MOPS medium showed the performance in a bench-top bioreactor to be consistent with the initial shake flask results, with a 1.2-fold to 2-fold increase in titer and yield (Supplementary Fig. 8). We also evaluated performance in T12 medium. With implementation of pH control, we hypothesized that despite high acetate production in IB1379, premature growth arrest in T12 medium could be avoided by controlling culture pH. IB1379 did reach a much higher final OD600 than L19S (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 9), and there was no residual acetate at the end of the fermentation, presumably because it was reassimilated by the cells. By comparison, L19S reached a lower OD600 but yielded an almost 10-fold increase in specific MI titer. We also evaluated glucaric acid production from IB1379GA and L19GA in T12 medium in bioreactors. As seen with MI production trials in bioreactors, there was no residual acetate in IB1379GA fermentations, biomass accumulation was higher than L19GA, and product titers were low (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 10). L19GA produced a nearly 4-fold increase in titers over IB1379GA by producing almost 0.7 g/L of glucaric acid (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 10).
Table 1
MI and glucaric acid production in T12 medium in a 3L bioreactor. QS-based dynamic control of Pfk-1 activity boosted specific titers of MI by almost 10-fold and of glucaric acid by almost 5-fold, indicating that the QS device functions consistently across shake flasks and bioreactor scales. With QS-based Pfk-1 downregulation, cultures reached a lower biomass and gave higher product titers, presumably due to the redirection of flux from central carbon metabolism into heterologous production. Culture growth profiles are provided in Supplementary Figures 9 and 10, respectively. DCW refers to the endpoint dry cell weight in the culture. Error represented as s.d. of duplicate bioreactor runs.
Strain
Product titer (g/L)
Final OD600
Specific Titer (g MI/g DCW)
Yield (g MI/g glucose)
MI Production
IB1379
0.23 ± 0.07
17.4 ± 0.8
0.03 ± 0.01
0.023 ± 0.007
L19S
1.28 ± 0.02
10.2 ± 0.5
0.27 ± 0.01
0.128 ± 0.002
Glucaric Acid Production
IB1379GA
0.17 ± 0.02
13.4 ± 0.7
0.03 ± 0.01
0.003 ± 0.001
L19GA
0.68 ± 0.11
10.5 ± 0.8
0.14 ± 0.01
0.014 ± 0.001
Production of shikimate using dynamic pathway modulation
In order to test the utility of the Esa QS device in other pathways, we installed this device at a completely different metabolic branchpoint in which dynamic flux regulation is required to improve titers. Shikimate is an intermediate in the chorismate pathway which eventually leads to production of aromatic amino acids (AAA)[30] (Fig. 5A). It is also a biologically important compound that is an essential starting material for the synthesis of neuraminidase inhibitors, such as Tamiflu®, effective in the treatment of influenza[31]. Attempts at bioproduction of shikimate have traditionally involved deleting the genes for shikimate kinases, aroK and aroL, such that shikimate cannot be converted to shikimate-3-phosphate[30]. The fermentation medium must consequently be supplemented with expensive AAA to facilitate growth[30]. Recent academic studies and patent literature have suggested that dynamically downregulating AroK and AroL can mitigate the need for such supplementation, as AAA can be synthesized in the first phase of the fermentation to allow growth, followed by shikimate accumulation[32,33]. Unlike the G6P branchpoint where endogenous flux was siphoned into a heterologous pathway for glucaric acid production, this case requires the accumulation of an endogenous metabolite and thereby presents an alternative scenario for the relevance of autonomous, dynamic pathway modulation.
Figure 5
Shikimate production through the aromatic amino acid (AAA) biosynthesis pathway using the QS valve. (a) Shikimate is an intermediate in the AAA biosynthesis pathway, whose accumulation competes with production of the AAA. To enable accumulation of shikimate without supplementing with costly AAA, AroK was dynamically downregulated using the QS valve. Native copies of aroK and aroL, the shikimate kinase isozymes, were deleted. (b) Shikimate titers in strains with various EsaI expression cassettes. With constitutive AroK expression, as in wildtype MG1655 or in a QS strain lacking EsaI (AG2310), there is no accumulation of shikimate. With differential EsaI expression, an optimal strain emerges that maximizes the production of shikimate to >100 mg/L. Error bars denote s.d. of triplicate cultures.
To test our hypothesis, we used our device to dynamically control AroK expression. aroL was deleted, while a weak SsrA degradation tag (AANDENYAASV, “ASV”) was added to aroK and placed under the P promoter in the wildtype MG1655 genome. esaRI70V was also driven from a constitutive promoter (apFAB104)[23] in the genome, resulting in strain AG2310 (Supplementary Table 2). It is important to note that initial attempts to add stronger SsrA degradation tags to genomic aroK prevented the strain from growing in MOPS minimal medium without AAA supplementation, again demonstrating the sensitivity of cell viability to changes in endogenous gene expression. In order to implement dynamic downregulation of AroK, selected weak cassettes from the EsaI expression library were inserted in strain AG2310 leading to a set of strains with different switching times (L24SA, L19SA, L25SA, and L31SA; Supplementary Table 2). Cultivation in MOPS minimal medium resulted in varied shikimate accumulation, with an intermediate switching time yielding the highest shikimate accumulation of more than 105 mg/L (Fig. 5B). Strain AG2310 and wildtype MG1655 were able to grow in minimal medium without AAA supplementation but were unable to accumulate any shikimate with constitutive AroK expression. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of shikimate accumulation in defined, minimal medium without addition of AAA, validating our Esa QS device as a generalizable tool for dynamic pathway modulation.
Discussion
We report the engineering of tunable genetic circuits using parts from a bacterial QS system to exercise autonomous, dynamic control over target metabolic genes and redirect pathway fluxes. These circuits were built from pathway-independent parts, and were applied to regulate metabolic fluxes and achieve substantial increases in titers of various products. Previous studies of dynamic regulation have proposed strategies to sense and respond to specific intermediates[34,35], cell states[9] or medium compositions[36]. Although these strategies can be effective, they are specific to the pathway for which they are developed. Using nutrient starvation is a well-established regulatory control strategy[36] but our attempts to boost MI titres with a circuit that responds to phosphate depletion suggested that nutrient perturbations result in unknown global metabolic effects, limiting industrial use (Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Fig. 11).As endogenous gene expression is often low and highly-regulated, tight control during both ON and OFF states is required. Transcription of the target gene can be abrogated by our QS circuit, but cellular protein pools must also be depleted to observe phenotypic changes. We altered natural degradation rates by appending degradation tags to target proteins. Strong tags were required to deplete GFP and Pfk-1 pools, whereas a weaker tag was needed to ensure sufficient AroK levels in the ON state. Fluorescence profiles of a subset of strains in Figure 1C with untagged GFP confirmed that degradation tags are needed to deplete these stable proteins (Supplementary Fig. 12). Precise circuit tunability was achieved through a chromosomal library of EsaI expression levels, revealing that circuit switching times were optimal at the lowest EsaI expression levels. This highlights the sensitivity of circuit-triggering time to AHL production rate and underscores the fact that endogenous gene expression only needs to be slightly perturbed to substantially affect production of heterologous compounds. Our attempts to use a reverse QS-circuit configuration in which an activating promoter was driving expression of SspB, an SsrA-dependent degradation protein targeted to Pfk-I, failed as even leaky expression completely suppressed growth (Supplementary Note 3, Supplementary Fig. 13 and 14).Our system is tunable and fully autonomous, and does not require external inducer addition. A library of EsaI circuits that produce the ‘trigger molecule’ at variable rates resulted in a series of strains that provide different switching rates, making it possible to find the optimal circuit for any pathway.Despite ample evidence that circuits developed for product synthesis often fail to translate from the laboratory to industry[27], robustness of synthetic biology devices is often overlooked. Quorum sensing relies on extracellular signals which can vary upon mixing [37], so it is vital to scale studies up into bioreactors to prove they are translatable to industrial contexts. We evaluated our QS circuits in various media and found that with richer, industrially-relevant medium, dynamic regulation prevented overflow metabolism and unwanted acetate production. Performance of our circuit in shake flasks and bioreactors was consistent, and revealed how carbon flux in central metabolism can be wasted by excess acetate and biomass production.Dynamic regulation of pathway fluxes has emerged as a new frontier in metabolic engineering[38-40]. The QS system we have developed enables precise tunability of an engineered pathway with minimal upfront effort in any growth environment. As production strategies become more complex, host genetic backgrounds become more cumbersome to engineer. The strategies we report here exemplify the next stage in dynamic metabolic engineering, with standardized and streamlined engineering methods.
Online Methods
All strains and plasmids used in this study are summarized in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Sequences for specific promoter, 5′ UTRs and degradation tags used in the various expression cassettes are provided in Supplementary Table 6. For plasmid preparations and genetic manipulations, cells were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at either 30 °C or 37 °C. Temperature-sensitive plasmids were cured at 42 °C. Strain IB1379 was previously constructed[17].
Strain construction
GFP characterization of QS circuit
For initial characterization of QS-based transcriptional control with varying switching times, the esaRI70V expression cassette was integrated into the genome under the control of a synthetic promoter (apFAB104)[23]. esaRI70V is a mutant version of the wildtype esaR that was previously engineered to respond to higher threshold concentrations of AHL than the wildtype protein[41]. Integration was performed via “clonetegration”[42]. The pOSIP-KH backbone and the desired EsaRI70V expression cassette were digested with KpnI and PstI and ligated overnight. The ligation product was used to transform E. coli strainMG1655 for integration at the HK022 locus. The phage integration genes and antibiotic resistance cassette were cured with pE-FLP[42], yielding strain AG2681. The EsaI expression library was installed as described below.The P promoter was amplified from pCS-PesaS-lux[41] and was appended to GFP tagged with a modified SsrA tag (AANDENYALVA, “LVA”) using overlap extension PCR to yield PesaS-GFP(LVA). This cassette was inserted into the pCOLA Duet Vector using restriction digestion and ligation to yield pCOLA-PesaS-GFP(LVA) (Supplementary Table 3). A separate version of this plasmid was also created in which GFP was not appended to any degradation tag, yielding pCOLA-PesaS-GFP (Supplementary Table 3).
Dynamic control of Pfk-1
For QS-based transcriptional control of Pfk-1, the pfkA locus was amplified from the E. coli genome with primers that appended the standard SsrA degradation tag (AADENYALAA, “LAA”). The P promoter was appended to pfkA using overlap extension PCR to yield P. This cassette was used to replace the native pfkA locus and the corresponding promoter using the “landing pad” method[43]. Briefly, this cassette was cloned into vector pTKIP-neo by restriction digestion and ligation with HindIII and KpnI, yielding pTKIP-P. Lambda-red mediated recombination was used to introduce the tetracycline resistance marker and “landing pad” sequences into the genome at the pfkA locus in IB1379. This strain was transformed with pTKRED and pTKIP-P and integration was achieved after cleavage of the pTKIP-P plasmid and subsequent lambda-red-mediated recombination of the P and kanamycin resistance cassette sequences into the pfkA locus. The kanamycin resistance cassette was cured by expression of FLP recombinase from pCP20. Next, the esaRI70V was integrated into the genome under control of a synthetic promoter (apFAB104) at the HK022 phage locus using “clonetegration”[42], as described previously, yielding strain IB2275.
Dynamic control of AroK
For QS-based dynamic control of the shikimate pathway, aroK was ligated to the P promoter, and this combined piece was ligated to an expression cassette consisting of esaRI70V driven by a synthetic promoter (apFAB104). A weak SsrA tag (AANDENYAASV, “ASV”) was appended to the C-terminus of aroK, yielding esaRI70V-P This cassette was genomically integrated, using “clonetegration”, into the HK022 locus of a MG1655 strain in which the native copies of aroK and aroL were deleted, yielding strain AG2310.
EsaI expression library
To implement a library of promoter and RBS variants to drive esaI expression from the genome, a select number of promoters and RBS variants were chosen whose combinatorial assembly spanned the predicted expression space in Mutalik et al[22]. We chose five promoters and six RBS variants to give a total library size of 30 combinations. A comprehensive list of all combinations that were constructed for the EsaI expression library and the associated expression strengths is provided in Supplementary Table 1. A single RBS variant from the BioFAB registry was used as a template for PCR amplification with primers containing the different promoters at the 5′ end, and the variable regions of the RBS variants at the 3′ end. This led to a series of amplicons containing different promoter and RBS variant combinations. The esaI locus was amplified from pAC-EsaRI[44] and was appended to the amplicons containing promoters and RBS variants using overlap extension PCR. The combined fragments were cloned into pOSIP-KO[42] using restriction digestion with Kpn1 and Sph1, and AG2681, IB2275 and AG2310 were transformed with the ligated plasmids to yield a library of strains with esaI genomically integrated at the 186 phage locus. The complete list of all combinations of EsaI cassettes and the corresponding strain denotations are given in Supplementary Table 1.To prepare strains to make glucaric acid, the λDE3 lysogen was first inserted into strains L24S, L19S, L31S and IB1379 using a λDE3 Lysogenization Kit (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). Next, in order to eliminate catabolism of glucaric acid and the pathway intermediate glucuronic acid, uxaC and gudD were sequentially deleted from these strains via P1 transduction from the Keio collection donor strains[45], yielding strains L24SGA, L19SGA, L31SGA and IB1379GA (Supplementary Table 2).
Phosphate-starvation-based control
A list of all strains utilized in this study and the relevant genotypes are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Strains IB1863, IB1624, IB1643, and IB1379 were previously constructed[17]. To engineer strains that induce sspB upon phosphate depletion, the P promoter and a synthetic 5′ UTR were appended to sspB using an extended 5′ overhang on the PCR primer for amplification of the sspB sequence from the E. coli genome. Integration of the sspB expression cassette into the genome was carried out via “clonetegration” [42]. The pOSIP-CH backbone and the desired sspB expression cassette were digested with KpnI and PstI and ligated overnight. The ligation product was used to transform strains IB1624 and IB1643 for integration at the HK022 locus. The phage integration genes and antibiotic resistance cassette were cured with pE-FLP, yielding the strains IB1509 and IB643.
QS-based post-translational control
To construct strains that utilize QS-based induction of sspB, an EsaR-responsive expression cassette for sspB expression was first constructed. Briefly, esaR was amplified from pAC-EsaR[41] using primers that appended the 5′ UTR and a synthetic promoter (apFAB104). Additionally, P was amplified from pCS-PesaR-lux[41], and sspB was amplified from the E. coli genome. These three pieces were joined together using overlap-extension PCR to create esaR-P-sspB. The cassette was cloned into pOSIP-CH42 using restriction digest with PstI and KpnI, and the resultant construct was used to transform IB1643 to allow genomic integration at the HK022 locus. Phage integration genes and the antibiotic resistance marker were cured with pE-FLP as described previously[42] to yield strain IB2265.To reduce the translation rate of sspB, a genomic RBS library with varying levels of predicted translational efficiency was inserted into the chromosome using methods described in Reisch et al[46]. Briefly, we first generated a library of RBS variants of different strengths by using the RBS calculator[47] and introducing a three base pair degeneracy into the RBS and 5′ UTR of sspB in IB2265. An 80-mer oligonucleotide that targeted the lagging strand of the sspB RBS (gttaagtaaaagaagcagccaattcattaaagagNNgaaaggatcNatggatttgtcacagcta acaccacgtcgtccct) that contained three nucleotide degeneracies (denoted as “N” in the sequence above) was obtained. The underlined portion in the sequence denotes the original RBS sequence. In addition, a guide RNA sequence was designed to target a 21-base pair region (ttaaagaggagaaaggatcca) that was adjacent to an NGG sequence in the original RBS sequence to allow Cas9 counterselection against the wild-type genome. Strain IB2265 was first transformed with plasmid pCas9CR, for Cas9 expression, and then with pKDsgRNA-sspB, which possessed the lambda-Red genes in addition to the sgRNA. The lambda-Red genes were expressed by the addition of 1% arabinose and incubated for 15 minutes and then transformed with the 80-mer. After a two-hour recovery, the cells were plated on anhydrotetracyline-containing medium to induce Cas9 counterselection. Colonies were screened in the BioLector (m2plabs, Baesweiler, Germany) for growth with and without AHL in MOPS minimal medium (described below), and one was chosen for further characterization, yielding strain AG2349.
Culturing and fermentations
GFP characterization
Switching times for the various EsaI variants were quantified using the BioLector microbioreactor system (m2p-labs, Baesweiler, Germany). Individual colonies were inoculated in LB medium and grown overnight at 30 °C. Working 1-mL cultures were inoculated from these seeds into BioLector 48-well flower plates and incubated at 30 °C, 1200 rpm (3 mm orbit), and 80% relative humidity. The plate was sealed with gas-permeable sealing foil (m2p-labs) to reduce evaporation. Cultures were monitored for OD (BioLector Units) and GFP fluorescence over time. To ascertain switching ODs for a given strain, the corresponding cell density at the point of peak fluorescence was obtained from the fluorescence and biomass time curves. It was assumed that higher AHL production rate and stronger EsaI expression led to lower switching ODs. Strains were rank-ordered based on switching ODs and the trends were compared to the rank-ordered list of strains based on predictions from Mutalik et al[22].
Growth-based screening
The RBS libraries generated to tune down the translation rate of sspB were screened for growth using the BioLector microbioreactor system (m2p-labs, Baesweiler, Germany). Individual colonies were inoculated in LB medium, grown overnight at 30 °C at 250 rpm, then diluted 1:100 into modified MOPS medium and grown for ~24 hrs. Working cultures of 1 ml total volume in MOPS medium were inoculated from this seed in a BioLector 48-well flower plate and incubated at 30 °C, 1200 rpm (3 mm orbit), and 80% relative humidity. Each seed culture was used to inoculate two wells in the BioLector plate - one supplemented with 10 μM AHL and one without AHL. The plate was sealed with gas-permeable sealing foil (m2p-labs) to reduce evaporation. Culture OD was monitored over time.
Shake flask fermentations
Initial growth studies and MI production trials were performed in 250-ml baffled shake flasks with 60-ml working volume at 30 °C and 250 rpm in modified MOPS minimal medium containing 10 g/L D-glucose, 3 g/L NH4Cl, 1 g/L K2HPO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 40 mM MOPS, 4 mM Tricine, 50 mM NaCl, 100 mM Bis-Tris, 134 μM EDTA, 31 μM FeCl3, 6.2 μM ZnCl3, 0.76 μM CuCl2, 0.42 μM CoCl2, 1.62 μM H3BO3, and 0.081 μM MnCl2. When noted, the medium was also supplemented with 0.2% casamino acids. For phosphate starvation experiments, the concentration of K2HPO4 in the medium was varied from 0.1 to 1 g/L. For strains containing pTrc-INO1, the medium was also supplemented with 100 μg/ml carbenicillin for plasmid maintenance. Strains were initially grown in 3-ml LB medium at 30 °C overnight, and then diluted 1:100 into 5-ml seed cultures of modified MOPS medium (containing 0.2% casamino acids if the subsequent fermentations were also performed with casamino acids) for ~24 hrs at 30 °C. These were used to inoculate working flask cultures at OD600 0.05. For MI production trials, shake flask cultures were also supplemented with 50 μM β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to induce INO1. Flasks were incubated at 30° C with 250 rpm shaking and 80% humidity. Samples were taken periodically for measurement of enzyme activity, mRNA quantification, and extracellular metabolites. Fermentations were carried out for 72 or 95 hrs, at which point all glucose was consumed.Shake flask fermentations to measure MI production were also carried out in T12 medium containing 10 g/L D-glucose, 7.5 g/L yeast extract, 7.5 g/L soy peptone, 7 g/L Na2HPO4, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 3 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 4 mM MgSO4, as well as 100 μg/ml carbenicillin for plasmid maintainence. Overnight 3-ml cultures were started in T12 medium at 30 °C, and then diluted 1:100 into fresh 30-ml starters to grow for ~5 hours until exponential phase was achieved. 60-ml working cultures, supplemented with 50 μM IPTG, were then inoculated at OD600 0.05. Flasks were incubated at 30° C with 250 rpm shaking and 80% humidity. Samples were taken periodically for measurement of enzyme activity and extracellular metabolites. Fermentations were carried out for 64 hrs, at which point all glucose was consumed.Glucaric acid production trials were conducted in T12 medium containing 10 g/L glucose as described above. The λDE3 lysogen was inserted into the strains to be tested (noted above), and the resultant strains were transformed with pRSFD-IN-MI and pTrc-Udh (Supplementary Table 3). The medium was supplemented with 100 μg/ml carbenicillin and 50 μg/ml kanamycin for plasmid maintenance. Overnight cultures and reinoculation were carried out as described above for MI production. 60-ml working cultures, supplemented with 100 μM IPTG to induce the glucaric acid pathway enzymes, were inoculated at OD600 0.05, and flasks were incubated at 30° C with 250 rpm shaking and 80% humidity.Samples were taken periodically to measure extracellular metabolites. Shikimate production trials were conducted in modified MOPS medium containing 10g/L glucose as described above. Strains were initially grown overnight in 3-ml LB medium and then diluted 1:100 into 5-ml seed cultures of modified MOPS medium for ~24 hrs at 30 °C. These were used to inoculate 50-ml working flask cultures at OD 0.05. Flasks were incubated at 30° C with 250 rpm shaking and 80% humidity. Samples were taken periodically for measurement of extracellular metabolites, and fermentations were carried out for 72 hrs until all glucose was consumed.
Production trials in bioreactors
Scale-up production trials for MI were carried out in either the modified MOPS minimal medium described previously or T12 medium in a standard 3L benchtop bioreactor (Infors HT, Bottmingen, Switzerland). For MOPS trials, overnight LB cultures were used to inoculate seed cultures in modified MOPS minimal medium, then grown at 30 °C for ~24 hrs. For trials in T12 medium, cultures were grown overnight in T12 medium at 30 °C. These were diluted 1:100 in fresh T12 medium and allowed to grow for ~5 hrs until exponential phase was achieved. In both cases, a 1.25 L working culture, containing 50 μM IPTG to induce INO1, was inoculated to an initial OD600 0.05 for MI production. All cultivations were done in the presence of 100 μg/ml carbenicillin for plasmid maintenance. During fermentation, oxygen was supplied by filtered air at 0.75 liters/min and agitation was adjusted to maintain a 35% dissolved oxygen level (250 – 750 rpm). The pH of the culture was set to 7.0 and controlled by addition of 4 M NaOH. The temperature of the culture was maintained at 30 °C. Samples were taken periodically for measurement of extracellular metabolites and dry cell weight (calculated from measured OD600 values as 0.47*OD600). Two independent trials were run for each bioreactor experiment.Glucaric acid production trials in T12 medium were carried out with a similar protocol as MI production trials with the following changes. For maintenance of both plasmids, 100 μg/ml carbenicillin and 50 μg/ml kanamycin were used. Induction of all pathway enzymes was achieved with 100 μM IPTG.
Phosphofructokinase activity assays
Samples for activity assays of Pfk-1 were collected over the course of the fermentations. Activity measurements were carried out according to the protocol reported previously[17].
Quantification of mRNA levels
To quantify the relative transcript levels of pfkA across various strains, 1-ml samples were collected over the course of the fermentation and mixed with 2-ml of RNAprotect bacteria reagent (Qiagen). These were vortexed briefly to mix, incubated for 5 min at room temperature, centrifuged at 5000×g for 10 min to pellet the cells and stored at -80 °C until processing.Total mRNA was extracted using the illustra RNAspin Mini Kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The eluted total RNA was subjected to an additional DNaseI digestion step to remove genomic DNA using the TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Life Technologies). Concentrations were measured using Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). Next, the cDNA was synthesized using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen), ensuring that equal amounts of RNA was added to every reaction for normalization across samples. Protocols were followed as provided by the respective kits. Quantitative PCR was performed using the ABI 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), and the 2X Brilliant II SYBR qPCR High ROX Master Mix (Agilent Technologies). Reactions contained 2 μL of cDNA from the corresponding RNA isolation, as well as appropriate primers and the master mix quantities as described by the protocols provided with the kit to give a total reaction volume of 25 μL. Amplification was carried out using the following program: initial incubation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Threshold cycle values were set by the software and the CT values for each respective sample were obtained and used to calculate fold-differences in pfkA transcript levels compared to IB2275.
Quantification of extracellular metabolites
Glucose, MI, acetate and glucaric acid levels were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on an Agilent 1100 or 1200 series instrument (Santa Clara, CA) with an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 mm by 7.8 mm; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Sulfuric acid (5 mM) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min (isocratic) was used as the mobile phase. Compounds were quantified from 10 μl sample injections using a refractive index detector. Column and refractive index detector temperatures were held at 55° C.Shikimate was quantified with a ZORBAX SB-Aq column (4.6 mm × 150 mm × 3.5 μm). The HPLC was run with a mixture of solution A (20 % methanol) and solution B (25 mM Ammonium formate, pH 2.5) as eluant at a flowrate of 0.6 ml/min. The following gradient was used: at 0–2 min, 2% solution A and 98% solution B; by 17 min, 10 % solution A and 90% solution B; by 18 min, 100% solution A and 0% solution B; at 18–19 min, 100% solution A and 0% solution B; by 20 min, 2% solution A and 98% solution B; at 20–22 min, 2% solution A and 98% solution B. Compounds were quantified with 10 μl injections using diode-array detection.
Statistics
All error bars are reported as standard deviation of replicates. The number of replicates is provided in the corresponding figure caption. Where relevant, two-tailed t-tests are used to demonstrate differences in values.
Authors: André L Rodrigues; Nathalie Trachtmann; Judith Becker; Ananta F Lohanatha; Jana Blotenberg; Christoph J Bolten; Claudia Korneli; André O de Souza Lima; Luismar M Porto; Georg A Sprenger; Christoph Wittmann Journal: Metab Eng Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 9.783
Authors: François St-Pierre; Lun Cui; David G Priest; Drew Endy; Ian B Dodd; Keith E Shearwin Journal: ACS Synth Biol Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 5.110
Authors: Tae Seok Moon; Sang-Hwal Yoon; Amanda M Lanza; Joseph D Roy-Mayhew; Kristala L Jones Prather Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Irene M Brockman Reizman; Andrew R Stenger; Chris R Reisch; Apoorv Gupta; Neal C Connors; Kristala L J Prather Journal: Metab Eng Commun Date: 2015-12-01
Authors: Frederick K Balagaddé; Hao Song; Jun Ozaki; Cynthia H Collins; Matthew Barnet; Frances H Arnold; Stephen R Quake; Lingchong You Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Pricila Hauk; Kristina Stephens; Chelsea Virgile; Eric VanArsdale; Alex Eli Pottash; John S Schardt; Steven M Jay; Herman O Sintim; William E Bentley Journal: ACS Synth Biol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 5.110