Literature DB >> 28179002

Multi-functionality of the few: current and past uses of wild plants for food and healing in Liubań region, Belarus.

Renata Sõukand1, Yanina Hrynevich2, Iryna Vasilyeva2, Julia Prakofjewa2, Yuriy Vnukovich2, Jury Paciupa2, Aliaksei Hlushko2, Yana Knureva2, Yulia Litvinava3, Siarhei Vyskvarka4, Hanna Silivonchyk5, Alena Paulava2, Mare Kõiva6, Raivo Kalle6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the use of wild plants in the food, medicinal and veterinary areas within a small territory limited to one village council in the Liubań district of Belarus. The objectives of the research were to document the current and past uses of wild plants in this region for food and human/animal medication; to analyse the food, medicinal and veterinary areas in the context of wild plants; and to qualitatively compare the results with relevant publications concerning the wild food plants of Belarus.
METHODS: Fieldwork was carried out as a practical part of a development cooperation project in May 2016 in 11 villages of the Liubań district. One hundred thirty-four respondents were selected randomly. Information about local uses of wild plants was obtained via semi-structured interviews and the folk-history method. Interview records were digitalized and the data structured in Detailed Use Records (DUR), which were divided into food, medicinal and veterinary areas and then analysed to ascertain local perceptions.
RESULTS: A total of 2252 DUR of wild plants were recorded. Eighty-eight wild plant taxa belonging to 45 plant families were used across all three areas. Of these, 58 taxa were used in the food, 74 in the medicinal and 23 in the veterinary areas. A relatively high percentage of the taxa were used in both the food and medicinal areas (55%) and an even greater percentage in both the medicinal and veterinary areas (87%). Comparison with earlier research on wild food plants shows the considerable difference among seldom-mentioned taxa or uses, showing possible regional differences despite the homogenization of the population during the Soviet era.
CONCLUSIONS: As the majority of taxa with overlapping uses belonged to the most utilized plants, there appears to be clear a tendency to use plants in several different areas once they are brought into the home. This may be due to the need to maximize the versatility of limited resources. While the number of wild taxa used is relatively high, the mean number of taxa used per person is quite low, which indicates the relatively minor importance of wild plants in the respective areas in the study region. The low importance of snacks signals that unintended contact with nature has been lost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belarus; Ethnobotany; Ethnopharmacology; Ethnoveterinary; Food plants; Food-medicine; Liubań; Local knowledge; Medicinal plants; Wild plants

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28179002      PMCID: PMC5299745          DOI: 10.1186/s13002-017-0139-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed        ISSN: 1746-4269            Impact factor:   2.733


Background

Life in present-day, highly literate Europe is rapidly changing. This affects local practices in the use of wild plants for food and healing in both people and animals, which is part of the Local Ecological Knowledge, crucial for sustaining human life on earth. Therefore, an increase of interest in documenting such knowledge and understanding the changes it undergoes is well justified. The classical studies by Etkin [1, 2] and Pieroni and Price [3], as well as more recent field examples in Europe [4-6], have demonstrated either a dual perception and function of food and medicinal uses and even their co-evolution, or a remarkable overlap in the nomenclature of species used simultaneously in the food and medicinal areas. Thus, the need to look at the uses of wild plants from both perspectives, food and medicine, is also warranted. We can assume that the cultivation of plants brings them closer to people; the use of cultivated plants may increase as people have fewer encounters with the wild (for example [7]). Wild plants, in contrast, become more distant and less known, as a result of habitat loss, changes in the paths of human movement and the lessened need for wild supplies, as well as changes in cultural attitudes to wild foods or tastes [8, 9]. Simple logic will say that once the wild plant is brought home, it will be used for as many purposes as possible, for as long as the amounts gathered allow. Luczaj et al. [10] referred to Belarus as terra incognita with respect to modern ethnobotany. Indeed, the majority of the information gathered about ethnomedicinal and food uses of wild plants originates from rather distant times. To date [10], remains the only comprehensive publication on the use of wild food plants in both modern and historical contexts in the territory of Belarus. The first records on traditional medicine in Belarus date to the late XVIII–early XIX centuries, which were included in descriptions of rituals and daily life of the local population. In general, the attention of researchers has been focused on the study of ways to treat the causes of diseases and their prevention. For example, the work titled “Description of the Barysaŭ district” by E. Tyszkiewicz provided a comprehensive list of plants (with local names) with their medicinal (also emic) purpose and usage both in the past and at the time of publication [11]. Throughout the XIX and early XX century a systematic collection and publication of ethnomedicinal field data was conducted for Belarus by numerous authors (for example YE. Romanov [12, 13], N. Nikiforovskiy [14-16], M. Federowski [17, 18] P. Shein [19, 20], V. Dobrovol'skiy [21] A. Bahdanovič [22], F. Wereńko [23], N. Yanchuk [24]). The main attention of these researchers was focused on documenting charms, information about the people involved in treatment and the variety of used remedies, including those involving plants. The unique information regarding the local names of plants of the Hrodna region and their medicinal properties are presented in the publication by E. Orzeszkowa [25]. Significant contribution to the systematization of the traditional concepts of Belarusians about the causes and origins of diseases and their treatment were made by Polish (K. Moszyński [26], Cz. Pietkiewicz [27], etc.) and Russian (D. Zelenin [28], G. Popov [29], etc.) scientists. During the Soviet era field research on traditional medicine passed out of scientific interest. As was common within other Soviet regions only a few “critical analyses” of ethnographic data from this period were published (Mińko [30, 31]), exploring methods of treatment, including the use of herbal medicine and magic. Recently, Belarusian folklorists have been actively studying the semiotic status and symbolic image of plants in traditional culture (I. Šved [32]), non-plant traditional medicine as part of the traditional culture (T. Valodzina [33-37]) and ethnographic classification of methods of treatments (U. Lobač [38] and U. Filipienka [39]). However, thus far no comprehensive and complex approach to the regional use of wild plants in Belarus has been published. Therefore, in this study we decided to address one specific well-defined area of wild plants used for food and medicine pertaining to both humans and other animals within a little-studied territory. While classically such ethnobotanical fieldwork concentrates on food and medicinal uses of plants only, we choose to also include the veterinary area as domesticated animals are still kept in the researched region; and due to the widespread medical veterinary intervention this area is too small to be examined separately. The specific aims of this study are: 1) to document the current and past uses of wild plants in the Liubań district for food and human/animal medication; 2) to analyse the food, medicinal and veterinary areas in the context of wild plants; and 3) to qualitatively compare the results with relevant publications regarding the wild food plants of Belarus. We presume that wild plants are widely used in the region and remarkable overlap exists within the species used in both the food and medicinal areas.

Data and methods

Wild plants

In this article the concept of wild plants encompasses native and naturalized species not cultivated for food. The core of the selection is based on the internationally agreed upon ethnobotanical perception and refers primarily to plants growing without deliberate cultivation or those able to reproduce without human intervention [40-43]. It includes greenery trees (like Syringa vulgaris, Aesculus hippocastanum), but we excluded from the scope of this study all fruiting trees and shrubs cultivated for food purposes, even if they either run wild (like Prunus cerasus L. or Ribes rubrum L.) or have wild relatives (such as Ribes nigrum L. or Malus spp.), as a vast majority of people claimed that they collect fruits and other parts from the cultivated ones. As an exception we did include a taxon that was once cultivated, but now perceived somewhat as a nuisance (Armoracia rusticana). Other species that are cultivated for food purposes but tend to run wild (like Anethum graveolens L. or Nigella sativa L.) were excluded from this study.

Region

Belarus is located in Central and Eastern Europe, bordered by Lithuania to the north-west, Latvia to the north, Russia to the northeast and the east, Ukraine to the south, and Poland to the west. Its territory is about 207.6 thousand sq. km. The climate of Belarus is moderately continental, transitional between maritime and continental. The climatic conditions are caused by the position of the country in the temperate latitudes of the western part of the East European Plain [44]. Belarus, more than other countries, was affected by the Chernobyl disaster, which caused the relocation of millions of people. The whole territory of Belarus is part of the forest zone of Eastern Europe. Mixed forest is typical for Belarus, and from the north to the south there is a transition from boreal to nemoral forest types. Today, forests cover 37.8% of the total area, marshes 11.5%, grasslands 15.8% and bushes 1.9%. The vegetation varies with climate, soil type and topographic relief. Indigenous plants include about 100 species of trees and bushes as well as more than 1500 herbaceous plants [45]. The most common trees are conifers (pine, fir) and shrubs (juniper). The main deciduous species are birch, aspen, alder, as well as oaks and limes, and more rarely maple, hornbeam, ash, and poplar, among others. The most prominent shrubs are hazel, rowan, viburnum, buckthorn, raspberry, willow, vines, etc. The forests are also rich in mushrooms and berries, which includes strawberries, blueberries and cranberries in dry coniferous and mixed forests, and cranberries in swampy areas. Widespread meadow grasses include timothy, bluegrass, and various types of clover [45]. Liubań district is located in the southeast of the Minsk Region. The town of Liubań is the centre of the district which includes the township of Urečča and 125 rural settlements. The northern part of the district is located on the Central Biarezina plain, while the southern part is within the Prypiać Paliessie. In the central part of the district the Aresa River (a left-bank tributary of the Prypiać) flows from north to south. Most areas of the Paliessie region have been drained. About 33% of the area is covered by forests (coniferous and mixed deciduous forest, as well as birch, oak and alder that also grow there). The area is mostly agricultural and specializes in meat and milk cattle breeding, pig breeding and potato cultivation. Interviews were conducted in eleven villages, which are part of the village council of Asaviec, Liubań district (Fig. 1); for more information on the district see [46]. About 2450 inhabitants live in the 15 villages of the village council of Asaviec. The working-age population is dominated by men (men: 770; women: 533), while the reverse is true for the senior population (590 women and 221 men). Bigger villages, in particular, are home to numerous migrants from both Belarussian and Ukrainian parts of the Chernobyl radiation zone. In recent years, migrants from Donbas have also become common. They were first warmly received, but later locals became disappointed with their attitude: locals perceive that migrants consider life in the Asaviec region too hard and this makes them unsatisfied.
Fig. 1

Region under investigation

Region under investigation Orthodox Christianity is the religion of the vast majority of the rural population, although the Catholicism is also practiced. Unemployment officially does not exist; all working-age people are employed or have official exemptions for not working. Yet, some people admit that younger men temporally work in towns or in Russia to sustain their families, which is probably one reason for encountering so few young men. Retail shops are present in seven larger villages, where 100 to 900 people live; inhabitants of smaller villages are supplied by mobile shops visiting twice a week. Jaminsk has a hospital, and Plastok has a medical aid station served by a medical assistant/midwife. While some bigger villages have a better-developed water system, small villages have surface water wells, which can dry out in summer, and often one well is shared by several households. Toilets are mainly outside and the dominant washing place is the sauna. Houses are traditionally decorated inside and outside; as the wealth of the villagers allow, some renovation work (new windows, painting) is done, supported mainly by relatives living in towns. Many villagers still keep domestic animals (pigs, goats, ducks, hens, cows and horses), but admit that their numbers have diminished during the last several years. Smaller villages are built mainly in a linear fashion, so that houses are situated on either side of the road with few cross streets, making the settlement long but compact. Almost every household has a bench in front, outside the fence and along the street, so that home owners can “socialize” with fellow villagers sitting on these benches. A lot of effort is put into maintaining vegetable gardens: the selection of fresh vegetables in shops is quite modest, and so all greens and vegetables are grown in relatively small garden plots close to houses. Flower gardens, which are considered the pride and joy of any good lady of the house, are more common in bigger villages, but even here they are confined to only a small part of the whole allotment.

Data collection

The collection of data on the use of wild plants was part of a wider ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal field study, conducted in the Liubań district in May 2016 as a practical part of a development cooperation project financed by the Estonian Foreign Ministry. Interviewees were approached on a random basis, in an attempt to get a cross-section of the local population. Yet, this was not simple, as mainly only retired people were available for discussions during workdays, whereas other adults were working or busy with household tasks (on the weekend). The majority of people in the study sample were collective farm workers, and only few of them had secondary or higher education (working as officials or in the sphere of culture). For the analysis we selected responses of all 134 people who were borneither in the villages where the interviews took place or elsewhere in the district of Li ubań (mainly from neighbouring villages belonging to the same village council) and now living in the village in which they were interviewed. Of these respondents, 87 (64.9%) were women and 47 (35.1%) were men. The fewer number of men is due to low representation of elderly men in the villages. The mean age of the interviewees was 63.3 years; the oldest was 92 years old and the youngest was 27 years old. Interviews lasted from 0.5 to 2.5 h and were conducted either on the bench in front of the respondent’s house or in their homes, in which researchers were often invited (and then fed or offered (ritual) drinks), especially when it was raining. The folk history method (reconstruction of historical events through the memory of common people, sensu [47]) was employed: in addition to documenting current uses, we also asked interviewees to recall the uses of plants they had used themselves or observed their parents using in the past, especially during their childhood. In the semi-structured interviews we approached the subject through uses, not through specific plants. First, we inquired about the use of wild plants for food, naming specific food-use categories (soups, other hot dishes, salads, jams, desserts, put in bread, used for seasoning food and drinks, and snacks). As the interview proceeded, we asked about using plants and other means in healing (headache, cold, sore throat, heart problems, stomach ache, foot ache, wounds, etc.) both people and animals (when animals get ill) and also for other purposes related to health and wellbeing (prophylactics, being healthy, care of skin and hair, disinfection, good scent, etc.). We let the respondents elaborate on the subject. Where weather and the interviewee’s health or time permitted, walks in the gardens and surrounding meadows and forests were undertaken and voucher specimens collected. We also collected samples of dried plants available from the interviewees’ homes. Although it was late spring and most of the stores were already used up, we encountered a high variety of stored plants in many households. Interviews were voice-recorded upon permission of the interviewee, and field notes were also taken. The purpose of the study was explained to every person and prior informed consent was obtained from all interviewees. We followed the Code of Ethics of the International Society of Ethnobiology [48]. All interviews were subsequently transcribed. The voice-recorded interviews as well as their transcripts are stored at the The Center for Belarusian Culture, Language and Literature Research within the Archives of The Institute of Art, Ethnography and Folklore, named after K. Krapiva (AIAEF 23-16-2). Anonymized copies of interview transcripts are also stored at the Scientific Archive of the Estonian Folklore Institute (EFISA Valgevene2016) located in the Estonian Literary Museum. Whenever possible plant voucher specimens were taken or plants identified on the basis of dried samples. As it was not yet the full vegetation season, some plants were identified on the basis of their vernacular name and a full description provided by the interviewee. In those cases when interviewees were treating a genus as one unit, the plant was identified at the genus level only, even if voucher specimens for some representatives of the genus were collected (for example Hypericum, Rosa, Crataegus). This practice was followed as there is no guarantee that interviewees, at some point in their lives, did not collect representatives of other species belonging to the same genus. Collected voucher specimens were dried and identified with the help of Toomas Kukk (Curator of the Estonian University of Life Sciences herbaria); vouchers are deposited at the Estonian University of Life Sciences herbaria (TAA), assigned herbarium numbers within the range TAA0132555-0132710, and also bearing numbers LJUB001–152. Dried plant samples collected from respondents are deposited at the Scientific Archive of the Estonian Folklore Institute (EFISA Valgevene2016, bearing numbers LJUD001–85). Taxonomic identification, botanical nomenclature, and family assignments followed the Flora Europaea [49], The Plant List database [50], and the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV [51].

Data analysis

Interview records were digitalized and entered into a Microsoft Excel spread sheet. To follow emic categories, information was structured in Detailed Use Records (DUR adopted from [52]), where interviewees (i) mention a specific use (u, e.g. emic disease category [cough, sore throat, heart disease, back pain, etc.], food category [snack, drink, condiment, soup, jam, etc.], emic veterinary treatment) of a plant part (p, e.g. fruits, leaves, aerial parts, flowers, etc.) prepared in a certain way (w, e.g. topical application of fresh plant, tea (plants macerated in hot water), decoction (plants boiled in water), tincture (plants macerated in alcohol–either applied or drunk), special preparation, etc.). Interviewee-defined emic categories were employed to ascertain local perceptions. For every taxon, the number of Use Citations (UC–number of people who claimed the (specific) use of the plant during the interview) and the number of DUR were calculated for the sum of all uses and separately for food, medicinal and veterinary areas. UC were also calculated for general and emic categories. Following the recommendation given in several recent publications [53, 54] and to illustrate the diversity of various uses, uses mentioned by only one person were also included. Informant Consensus Factor (FIC [55]) was calculated for every use area as well as for different use categories within each of the three areas. The FIC is calculated as follows: number of UC minus the number of species used, divided by the number of use citations minus one. Finally, the reliability criterion [56] was also assessed. The influence of age of the interviewees on the number of used plants and DURs was assessed by calculating R2 in Microsoft Excel.

Use areas

For the comparative analysis, all DURs were attributed to one of three use areas (hereafter areas): –indicates that the use was related to food consumption, including hot and cold meals, drinks (including alcoholic ones), fermented foods, condiments, occasional snacks, the making of recreational teas (e.g. herbal beverages prepared as infusions or decoctions and consumed in a food context without folk medical indications sensu [57]), food preservatives and food preparation accessories (e.g. tree leaves put under bread during baking). –contains all uses related to the treatment or prevention of all diseases and illnesses that are locally known or diagnosed by a doctor, but also uses related to the perceived healthiness of a plant or product made from a plant, beauty procedures, insect repellent and the creation of a good atmosphere (contributing to wellbeing). –covers all uses of wild plants related to the treatment of home animals or specially emphasized fodder, distinct from the general “hay, grains and potato” fodder. For uses in the food area, qualitative comparison was made with data collected throughout Poland in 20th–21st centuries [10], while for the other two areas such a comparison was not possible due to the lack of recent data.

Results

Summary of the use of plants

Altogether, 88 wild plant taxa belonging to 45 plant families were used across all three areas (Table 1). Sixty-seven (76.1%) taxa met the reliability criterion, signifying that they were used by at least three people. We registered 2252 DUR of wild plants in total, with the food area dominating the variety of uses (54%, 1216 DUR), followed by uses related to the medicinal area (43%, 968 DUR) and the veterinary medicine and fodder area (3%, 68 DUR).
Table 1

Wild plants used in food, medicinal and veterinary areas

Family, taxa, voucher no.Local namesUsed partsMode of useEmic use categoryUC
Acoraceae
Acorus calamus L.aip, плюшнiк/air, pliušnikAerial partsPlaced in waterDisinfectant1
RootsRitual wearingEvil eye1
Stem (lower, white part)FreshSnack1
Adoxaceae
Viburnum opulus L., (LJUB036)кaлiнa/kalinaFruitsDriedRecreational tea1
Dried on twigsSnack1
FermentedHeart diseases2
Hypertension2
FreshCold2
Compote1
Dessert1
Fruit water2
Heart problems1
Hypertension1
Jam5
Kissel1
Taste additive to strong alcohol6
Snack1
Sore throat1
Syrup1
Wine1
FrozenSnack1
Raw jam1
In sugarPreserve1
JamCold1
Raw jamCough2
Heart problems1
TinctureHealthy1
Heart problems1
Hypertension4
Stomach ache1
TeaCough1
FlowersTeaHypertension1
LeavesDecoctionSore throat1
Amaranthaceae
Atriplex hortensis L.лeбядa кpacнaя/liebiada krasnajaAerial partsFreshSoup2
Chenopodium album L., (LJUB017)лeбядa, лябядa/liebiada, liabiadaAerial partsFreshSalad3
Snack3
Soup35
Amaryllidaceae
Allium ursinum L., (LJUB002)дзiкi чacнoк, чapaмшa, мeдвeжы лук/dziki časnok, čaramša, miedviežyj lukLeavesDriedCondiment for meat1
FreshSalad11
Snack5
Soup2
Condiment3
Condiment for soup1
Vitamins1
FrozenSnack1
MarinatedCondiment2
RootsFreshSnack1
Apiaceae
Aegopodium podagraria L., (LJUD035)cныць/snyćLeavesFreshSalad1
Carum carvi L., (LJUB132)кмiн, тмiн/kmin, tminSeedsDriedRecreational tea1
Condiment3
Condiment for bread4
Condiment for cheese1
Condiment for meat1
Condiment for sausages1
Asparagaceae
Convallaria majalis L.лaндыш/landyšFlowersTinctureHeart disease2
Maianthemum bifolium (L.) F.W.Schmidt, (LJUB065)мaйнiк/majnikFruitsFreshSnack1
Asteraceae
Achillea millefolium L., (LJUB118)пaдбeл, тыcячaлicнiк/padbiel, tysiačalisnikAerial partsDecoctionHeart problems1
FreshFodder for turkey1
TeaBile neutralizer1
Gastritis1
Stomach ache1
InflorescencesTeaPanacea1
Stomach ache2
Women diseases1
LeavesDecoctionWomen diseases1
Topical applicationCuts2
Wounds2
Arctium tomentosum Mill., (LJUB019)лaпуx, лoпуx, вaўчкi, дзяды, дзядoўнiк, paпeйнiк/lapuch, lopuch, vaŭčki, dziady, dziadoŭnik, rapiejnikInflorescencesDecoctionHair care2
LeavesFreshPut under bread when baked1
Topical applicationBack pain1
Bruises1
Foot ache3
Joint pain9
Knee ache2
Pain1
Painful place3
Rheumatic pains2
Tumour1
Wounds1
RootsDecoctionHair care3
Joint pain1
FreshVitamins1
Fresh, greasingJoint pain4
Tincture, topicalFoot ache1
Arnica montana L.apнiкa гopнaя/arnika hornajaWhole plantTeaHeart problems1
Nerves1
Artemisia absinthium L., (LJUB001)пaлын (cepы), пaлыннiк/palyn (siery), palynnikAerial partsDecoctionAppetizer for cows1
Diarrhoea in chicken1
Diarrhoea in cows3
Diarrhoea in pigs5
Rumination problems in cows3
DriedFodder for rabbits2
FreshDisinfectant for home animals1
Fodder for turkey1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
Covered withPreservative for potatoes1
TeaAppetizer2
Diarrhoea6
Helminthic infection1
Artemisia vulgaris L., (LJUB139)чapнaбы’льнiк, чopны пaлын, быльнiк/čarnaby’ĺnik, čorny palyn, byĺnikAerial partsDriedBlood in urine in cows1
fodder for rabbits1
FreshRecreational tea1
TeaDiarrhoea2
Bidens tripartita L.вaўчкi, чapaдa, чэpaдa/vaŭčki, čarada, čeradaAerial partBathDiathesis in children6
Calming1
Skin diseases1
Cyanus segetum Hill, (LJUD023)вaciлькi/vasiĺkiAerial partsTeaKidney diseases1
InflorescencesBathDiathesis in children1
CompressEye problems1
DriedRecreational tea2
TeaHealthy1
Helichrysum arenarium (L.) Moench, (LJUD007)бяccмepтнiк (пяcчaны)/biassmiertnik (piasčany)Aerial partsDriedRecreational tea1
TeaBile deficiency1
Gall stones1
Healthy1
Liver diseases5
Panacea2
Stomach ache2
Matricaria spp. (Incl. Matricaria chamomilla L., (LJUD025) and Matricaria suaveolens Koch)paмoнaк, paмaшкa/ramonak, ramaškaAerial partsDecoctionCalming1
Hair care1
Wounds1
TeaSore throat1
Stomach ache1
InflorescencesCompressEye problems2
DecoctionDandruff1
Hair care1
Heart problems1
Haemorrhoids1
Organism cleansing2
Women diseases1
Dried, eatenDiarrhoea1
Tanacetum vulgare L., (LJUB108)цытвa’p, цытвa’pнaя пaлынь, пiжмa/cytva’r, cytva’rnaja palyń, pižmaAerial partsFreshHelminthic infection1
TeaDiarrhoea2
Helminthic infection1
Stomach ache2
InflorescencesDecoctionHelminthic infection2
Dried, added to fodderHelminthic infection in cows1
Helminthic infection in pigs1
Strengthening of cows1
Strengthening of pigs1
Eaten freshHelminthic infection1
Stomach ache1
TeaDiarrhoea1
Helminthic infection1
LeavesTeaDiarrhoea1
Helminthic infection1
Taraxacum officinale (L.) Weber ex F.H.Wigg., (LJUB122)дзьмуxaвeц, aдувaнчыкi/dźmuchaviec, aduvančykiAerial partsFreshFodder for pigs1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
InflorescencesDecoctionJoint pain1
Kidney diseases1
Fermented with sugarImmune boosting1
FreshCold1
Fodder for pigs1
Good for cows1
Good for horses1
Jam10
Fresh, topical applicationJoint pain2
JamBronchitis1
Cancer1
Cold1
Sore throat1
Tuberculosis1
TinctureStomach ache1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
SyrupVitamins1
LeavesDecoctionHair care1
FreshFodder for pigs1
Fodder for home animals1
Salad7
TinctureStomach ache1
RootsCoffee substituteKidney stones1
DriedCoffee substitute1
Recreational tea1
Fresh, eatenCancer1
Tussilago farfara L., (LJUB023)пaдбeл, мaцi-мaчыxa, мaць-мaчыxa/padbiel, maci-mačycha, mać-mačychaAerial partsTopical applicationInflammation processes1
InflorescencesTeaCold1
Panacea1
LeavesDecoctionHealthy1
Headache1
Sore throat1
TeaCold1
Cough5
Expectorant1
Panacea1
Topical applicationHeadache1
Wounds1
Betulaceae
Alnus spp.aльxa, aлeшнiк/aĺcha, aliešnikBudsBathFoot hatching1
Cone-like fruitsDecoctionDiarrhoea in cows1
Diarrhoea in pigs1
Diarrhoea4
Stomach ache1
Betula spp., (incl. Betula pendula Roth (LJUB081))бяpoзa, бepёeзa/biaroza, beriozaBudsDriedTaste additive to strong alcohol1
TinctureDiarrhoea2
Epilepsy2
Gastric ulcer1
Gastritis1
Healthy1
Kidney diseases3
Panacea3
Sore throat2
Stomach ache3
Strengthening of organism1
Wounds3
Ritually fermented, bathEpilepsy1
TeaCold2
Diuretic1
Heart problems1
Panacea2
Sore throat1
CatkinsTinctureDiarrhoea1
Gastric ulcer1
Gastritis1
Panacea1
Stomach ache1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
Macerated in waterDiarrhoea in calves1
TeaCold1
LeavesBathAllergy1
DriedRecreational tea2
TeaCold1
Heart problems1
Panacea1
Stomach ache1
Topical applicationFoot ache1
ResinTopical applicationWounds2
SapFermentedKvass36
FreshDrink30
Instead of water2
Diuretic1
Increase volume of breast milk1
ProcessedDrink16
Kidney diseases1
TwigsBathProphylactics1
Whisked in saunaBack pain1
Healthy5
Promotes bloodstream1
Prophylactics10
Corylus avellana L.apэx (ляcны), фундук, apэшынa/arech (liasny), funduk, arešynaSeedsDriedSnack3
FreshSnack5
Boraginaceae
Pulmonaria spp.мeдунiцa/miedunicaFlowersFreshSnack1
Symphytum officinale L.aкoпнiк/akopnikLeavesTopical applicationBruises1
RootsTinctureAdhesion of bones1
Brassicaceae
Armoracia rusticana Gaertn. et al., (LJUB093)xpэн/chrenLeavesFreshPreservative for preserves1
Condiment3
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers8
Condiment for preserves1
Topical applicationBack pain1
Joint pain2
RootsDriedCondiment for meat1
FreshAppetizer1
Disinfectant1
Healthy1
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
Salad3
Snack2
Condiment13
Condiment for beet juice1
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers1
Condiment for meat3
Condiment for pork fat1
Macerated in beerDiabetes1
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik., (LJUB098)пacтуш’я cумкa, cумaчкa, cушaнкa/pastušja sumka, sumačka, sušankaAerial partsDecoctionHaemostatic1
TeaDiarrhoea1
Stomach ache1
Urinary bladder1
SeedsDriedBread additive1
Cannabaceae
Humulus lupulus L., (LJUD027)xмeль/chmieĺConesDecoctionInsomnia1
DriedBeer1
FreshBread additive1
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
LeavesDriedBeer1
Caprifoliaceae
Valeriana officinalis L.вaлepьян, вaляp’янкa/valieŕjan, valiarjankaAerial partsDriedRecreational tea1
TinctureHealthy1
TeaHeadache1
Heart problems2
Sedative1
RootsDecoctionHeart problems2
Joint pain1
Organism cleansing1
TinctureCalming1
Heart problems2
TeaCalming1
Headache1
Caryophyllaceae
Stellaria media (L.) Vill., (LJUB024)мaкpэц, мaкpiцa, звecчaткa/makrec, makrica, zviesčatkaAerial partsDecoctionCancer1
FreshSalad2
Tincture, topical applicationRheumatic pains1
Fresh, topical applicationFoot sores1
Headache1
Rheumatic pains2
Cupressaceae
Juniperus communis L.ядлoвeц, мaжжaвeльнiк/jadloviec, mažžavieĺnikGalbulesTinctureBack pain1
LeavesDecoctionBronchitis1
PollenPowderSkin diseases1
TwigsTeaCold1
Cold in domesticated animals1
Whisked in saunaHealthy2
Prophylactics2
Dryopteridaceae
Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H.P. Fuchs, (LJUB083)пaпapaтнiк/paparatnikLeavesBathRejuvenating1
Equisetaceae
Equisetum arvense L., (LJUB120)xвoшч пaлявы/chvošč paliavyAerial partsDecoctionBacterial diseases in bees1
TeaDiuretic1
Healthy1
Kidney diseases1
Ericaceae
Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng.тaлaкнянкa/talakniankaAerial partsTeaKidney diseases1
Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull, (LJUD079)вepecк/vierieskFlowersDriedRecreational tea1
Chimaphila umbellata (L.) Nutt., (LJUB146)cтaнaўнiк/stanaŭnikAerial partsTeaStomach ache1
TinctureStomach ache1
Ledum palustre L., (LJUD052)бaгoн, бaгoўнiк, буячнiк/bahon, bahoŭnik, bujačnikAerial partsDecoctionDiarrhoea in calves1
Diarrhoea in cows1
Bronchitis1
Diarrhoea1
DriedRecreational tea1
SmokedTick prevention1
TeaCough3
Nerves1
Vaccinium myrtillus L., (LJUB026)чapнiкa, чapнiчнiк, iвaнaвыя ягaды, чopныя ягaды, ягoднiк, ягaды (лecныe)/čarnicy, čarnika, čarničnik, ivanavyja jahady, čornyja jahady, jahodnik, jahady (liesnyje)Aerial partsDriedRecreational tea6
TinctureImprove vision1
TeaDiabetes1
Panacea1
Topical applicationRejuvenating1
FruitsCompoteEye problems1
Improve vision1
DecoctionCold1
DriedCompote8
Constipation1
Diabetes1
Diarrhoea12
Eye problems4
Healthy1
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
Recreational tea4
Snack8
Stomach ache7
Teething pain in children1
Dessert1
Dried, ritualStomach ache1
FreshCompote26
Dessert3
Diarrhoea2
Eye problems5
Fruit water1
Healthy1
Hypotension1
Improve vision3
Dessert1
Jam55
Juice1
Kissel4
Taste additive to strong alcohol6
Snack31
Stomach ache2
Syrup2
FrozenRaw jam2
Pies1
Snack6
JamEye problems1
Stomach ache3
ProcessedPies1
Dessert1
Sap dropped into eyeEye problems1
TeaDiarrhoea1
Vaccinium oxycoccos L.жуpaвiны, клюквa/žuraviny, kliukvaFruitsDriedRecreational tea1
fermentedWine1
FreshCold2
Compote4
Dessert1
Fruit water2
Hypertension2
Jam11
Juice2
Kissel2
Taste additive to strong alcohol2
Snack22
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers1
Condiment for sauerkraut9
fresh applied in earCO-intoxication1
FrozenRaw jam1
Snacks5
Fruit waterCold1
Hangover1
Hypertension1
TinctureHypertension1
Preserved in waterSnack1
TeaGastric ulcer1
Panacea1
Under waterSnack1
Vaccinium uliginosum L., (LJUD076)буякi, гaлубiкa/bujaki, halubikaAerial partsTeaHealthy1
FruitsCompoteAnaemia1
Bad blood1
DriedCold1
Compote3
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
Recreational tea2
Snack1
FreshCompote8
Jam19
Kissel1
Taste additive to strong alcohol2
Snack21
FrozenSnack4
Raw jam1
TeaDiuretic2
Vaccinium vitis-idaea L., (LJUB008)бpуcнiцы, бpуcнiкa, бpуcнiчнiк/brusnicy, brusnika, brusničnikAerial partsDriedRecreational tea9
FreshRecreational tea1
FrozenFrozen2
TeaDiuretic1
Fever1
Healthy1
Heart problems2
Kidney diseases1
Panacea1
Stomach ache1
FruitsCookedTonic1
DriedCompote3
Snack1
FreshCompote6
Dessert1
Fruit water1
Jam35
Kissel2
Liver diseases1
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
Snack14
Condiment for sauerkraut1
Syrup1
Wine1
FrozenSnack4
Fruit waterKidney diseases1
Sore throat1
ProcessedPies2
RefrigeratedRaw jam1
TeaHealthy1
Organism cleaning1
LeavesDriedRecreational tea5
TeaCold1
Constipation1
Diuretic1
Hypertension1
Kidney diseases5
Panacea1
Urinating problems1
Women diseases1
Fagaceae
Populus tremula L., (LJUD054)aciнa, тoпaль/asina, topaĺBarkCompressJoint pain1
DecoctionPanacea1
TincturePanacea1
Pulverized, eatenKidney diseases2
TeaImmune boosting1
BudsTinctureJoint pain1
LeavesTopical applicationWounds1
SapFermentedPreservative for birch sap1
SticksPut into bedAching legs1
TwigsFreshAdditive to compote1
Topical applicationConvulses1
Quercus robur L., (LJUB119)дуб/dubAcornsDried, groundedBread additive3
Appetizer for cows1
FreshBread additive1
Milled into flourFodder for home animals1
BarkBathDiathesis in children1
Foot hatching1
DecoctionBruises1
Diarrhoea3
Diarrhoea in cows2
Diarrhoea in pigs1
Gingival diseases1
Panacea1
Periodontitis1
DriedCoffee substitute1
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
Condiment1
Condiment for fermented birch sap1
FreshSnack1
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers2
Macerated in hot waterFodder for calves1
LeavesFreshPreservative for preserve1
Put under bread when baked10
Condiment for kvass1
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers5
Under bread2
InhalationHypertension1
Malformation of the leaveJuice, topical applicationWounds1
Topical applicationWarts1
TwigsBathProphylactics1
FreshPreservative for kvass3
Condiment for fermented birch sap1
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers1
Whisked in saunaBack pain1
Healthy5
Promotes bloodstream1
Prophylactics5
Hydrangeaceae
Philadelphus coronarius L.жacмiн/žasminLeavesDriedRecreational tea1
Hypericaceae
Hypericum spp., incl. Hypericum perforatum (LJUB095)cвeтaяннiк, звepaбoй/svietajannik, zvierabojAerial partsBathBody cleansing1
DecoctionDiarrhoea in cows1
Heart problems1
Rumination problems in goats1
Scabies1
DriedTaste additive to strong alcohol2
Recreational tea12
Condiment1
FreshStomach ache1
Tincture, drunkFor women to be strong against men1
Healthy3
Kidney diseases1
SmokedWhen piglets do not go to their mother1
TeaCold7
Cough3
Diarrhoea2
Fright1
Heart problems4
Liver diseases1
Panacea8
Pancreas1
Sore throat1
Stomach problems1
Stomach ache4
Tonus support1
Varix2
Lamiaceae
Comarum palustre L., (LJUB063)caбeльнiк/sabieĺnikRootsTincture, topical applicationJoint pain3
Origanum vulgare L., (LJUB043)мaцяpдушкa, душыцa, мaцяpдушкa/maciarduška, dušycaAerial partsDriedRecreational tea2
TeaCalming1
Cold1
Stomach problems2
Women diseases1
Thymus serpyllum L. (s.l.), (LJUB037)вepac, чaбapoк, чaбapэц, чaбop/vieras, čabarok, čabarec, čaborAerial partsDriedRecreational tea8
TeaCold3
Cough5
Hypertension1
Leguminosae
Trifolium spp., (LJUD053)кaнюшынa, клeвep/kaniušyna, klievierAerial partsFreshFodder for rabbits1
Fodder for pigs1
FlowersTeaHeart diseases2
Melanthiaceae
Veratrum lobelianum Berhn.чaмяpыцa/čamiarycaAerial partsDecoctionRumination problems in cows1
FreshRumination problems in cows2
Oleaceae
Syringa vulgaris L., (LJUB071)бэз (бeлы), cipэнь (бeлaя)/bez (biely), sireń (bielaja)BudsTinctureJoint pain1
FlowersDecoctionJoint pain1
DriedRecreational tea1
FreshSnack for luck1
Snack1
TinctureHealthy1
Stomach ache1
Tincture, topical applicationRheumatic pains6
Joint pain5
Foot ache1
Back pain1
LeavesFresh, topical applicationCuts1
Onagraceae
Epilobium angustifolium L.iвaн-чaй/ivan-čajAerial partsDriedRecreational tea3
TeaVitamins1
Whisked in saunaHealthy1
FlowersDecoctionHeadache1
Hypertension1
TeaHealthy1
Hypertension1
Kidney diseases1
LeavesDriedRecreational tea1
Orobanchaceae
Lathraea squamaria L.пятpoў кpэcт/piatroŭ krestRootsFreshVitamins for cows1
Oxalidaceae
Oxalis acetosella L., (LJUB109)зaчый шчaвeль, кicлiцa, зaячaя кaпуcтa, вepaбeйкaў шчaвeль/začyj ščavieĺ, kislica, zajačaja kapusta, vierabiejkaŭ ščavieĺLeavesFreshSalad1
Snack9
Papaveraceae
Chelidonium majus L., (LJUB140)paннiк, цындaлeй, чыcтaцeл, чicтaцeл/rannik, cyndaliej, čystaciel, čistacielAerial partsBathAllergy1
Body cleansing3
Diathesis in children3
Eczema1
Healthy1
DecoctionDiarrhoea in cows and pigs1
Beauty procedure1
Chickenpox1
Wounds1
KvassOrganism cleaning1
TinctureStomach problems1
Tincture, topical applicationRheumatic pains1
StewedScabies1
TeaBody cleansing1
Liver diseases1
LeavesFresh, snackedHealthy1
Topical applicationEczema1
Burns2
Cuts3
Toothache1
Wounds4
SapDiluted juice, lavationGingival bleeding2
IntakeGastric ulcer1
Allergy1
Prophylactics1
Topical applicationHaemostatic2
Skin diseases2
Warts9
Wounds9
Papaver spp.мaк, мaк-вiдук, дзiкi мaк, мaк-caмaceй/mak, mak-viduk, dziki mak, mak-samasiejSeedsDecoctionCalming1
DriedPies1
Soporific1
Condiment1
Condiment for bread1
Condiment for pancakes1
FreshHelminthic infection1
Pies1
Snack1
Soporific1
Pinaceae
Picea abies (L.) H.Karst., (LJUB121)eлкa/jelkaNeedlesFoot bathJoint pain1
TwigsWhisked in saunaHealthy1
Young conesFreshJam1
TinctureHealthy1
TeaCold1
Pinus sylvestris L., (LJUB082)cacнa, xвoя/sasna, chvojaPollenWhisked in saunaHealthy1
ResinTopical applicationWounds1
Wounds in cows1
ShootsFreshJam3
ProcessedRecreational tea1
TeaLiver diseases1
Lung diseases1
Stomach ache1
TwigsWhisked in saunaHealthy1
Prophylactics1
Young conesDecoctionCold1
FreshJam3
Snack1
JamBronchitis1
Cold3
Cough1
Kidney diseases1
Liver diseases1
Sore throat1
Stomach ache1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
Rheumatic pains1
ProcessedRecreational tea2
TeaBronchitis1
Cold2
Cough1
Immune boosting2
Inflammation processes2
Stomach ache1
Strengthening of organism2
Thyroid glands1
Tuberculosis1
Plantaginaceae
Plantago major L., (LJUB106)пaдapoжнiк/padarožnikLeavesFreshSalad1
Stomach ache1
Juice pressedGastric ulcer1
TeaDiarrhoea1
Heart problems2
Low acidity1
Kidney diseases1
Topical applicationAbscess3
Burns1
Cuts4
Cuts in domesticated animals1
Gingival wounds1
Headache3
Haemostatic1
Wounds32
Poaceae
Elymus repens (L.) Gould, (LJUB031)пыpaй, пыpeй, пыpэй/pyraj, pyriej, pyrejLeavesFreshSalad1
Topical applicationJoint pain1
RootsCompressEye problems1
DecoctionJoint pain1
FreshSoup1
Condiment for salad1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
Phleum spp.цiмaфeeўкa, тpaвa/cimafiejeŭka, travaAerial partsFresh, fodderTo increase cow milk production1
Polemoniaceae
Polemonium caeruleum L.ciню́гa гaлубaя/siniúha halubajaRootsTinctureEpilepsy1
Polygonaceae
Polygonum aviculare L., (LJUB042)cпapыш, тpaўкa-муpaўкa/sparyš, traŭka-muraŭkaAerial partsTeaDiarrhoea1
Kidney diseases1
Topical applicationHeadache1
Rumex spp. (incl. Rumex acetosa L., (LJUB151))шчaўe, шчaвeль, вepaб’iны, шчaвeль дзiкi, шчaвeль ляcны, шчaвep/ščaŭje, ščavieĺ, ščavieĺ vierabjiny, ščavieĺ dziki, ščavieĺ liasny, ščavierLeavesFreshPreserve1
Snack14
Soup61
Stomach problems1
FrozenSoup1
ProcessedSoup14
Rumex longifolius DC., (LJUB136)кoнcкi шчaвeль/konski ščavieĺSeedsTeaDiarrhoea1
Rhamnaceae
Frangula alnus Mill., (LJUB015)кpушынa/krušynaBarkTeaDiarrhoea1
FruitsFreshConstipation1
Dysentery2
Rosaceae
Crataegus spp., (LJUB085)бaяpышнiк/bajaryšnikFruitsDecoctionHeart problems1
DriedCondiment, processed birch sap1
TinctureHeart diseases1
Hypertension1
TeaHeart problems3
Hypertension1
LeavesTeaHeart problems2
Twigs with fruitsTinctureHeart problems1
Fragaria vesca L., (LJUB048)cунiцы, зeмлянiкa, зeмлянiчнiк/sunicy, ziemlianika, ziemlianičnikAerial partsDecoctionHeart problems2
Kidney diseases1
DriedRecreational tea1
FreshRecreational tea1
TeaLiver diseases1
Pneumonia1
FruitsDriedCompote2
Liver diseases2
Snack1
FreshCompote5
Dessert2
Jam17
Snack16
FrozenDessert1
Snack2
TeaCold1
LeavesDriedRecreational tea5
TeaHealthy1
Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch., (LJUB047)дзiвaciл, кaлгaн, дpaўлянкa, лaпчaткa/dzivasil, kalhan, draŭlianka, lapčatkaRootsDecoctionAntitoxic1
Stomach ache1
DriedTaste additive to strong alcohol4
TinctureAntimicrobic1
Gastric ulcer2
Healthy5
Heart problems1
Inflammation1
Kidney diseases3
Sore throat1
Stomach problems1
Stomach ache12
Thyroid glands1
Tincture, topical applicationBurns1
Cuts1
Rotten wounds1
TeaDiarrhoea1
Gastritis1
Panacea1
Stomach ache4
Prunus padus L., (LJUB084)чapoмxa/čaromchaFlowersTincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
Rheumatic pains1
FruitsCompoteDiarrhoea1
FreshDiarrhoea2
Dysentery2
Snack2
TinctureDiarrhoea1
TwigsPlaced in waterDisinfectant1
Pyrus pyraster (L.) Burgsd., (LJUB050)гpушы дзiкiя, дзiчкa/hrušy dzikija, dzičkaFruitsDecoctionDiarrhoea5
Diarrhoea in cows1
CompoteCold1
Diarrhoea1
Stomach ache1
DriedCold1
Compote4
Diarrhoea4
Healthy1
Recreational tea1
Snack2
Stomach ache2
FermentedKvass2
FreshJam1
Snack3
Fodder for pigs1
Rosa spp., (LJUD001)шыпшынa, шыпoўнiк, шыпoвнiк/šypšyna, šypoŭnik, šypovnikFruitsDecoctionHeart problems1
DriedRecreational tea8
Condiment for processed birch sap1
FreshCompote2
Jam3
TinctureStomach ache1
TeaCold2
Healthy1
Heart diseases1
Hypertension1
Immune boosting3
Inflammation processes2
Kidney diseases3
Liver diseases2
Panacea2
Rubus caesius L., (LJUB003)aжыны, eжaвiкa (лecнaя)/ažyny, ježavika (liesnaja)FruitsFreshCompote2
Dessert2
Jam14
Kissel1
Taste additive to strong alcohol1
Recreational tea1
Snack8
FrozenHypertension1
Liver diseases1
Snack2
ProcessedPies1
LeavesDriedRecreational tea3
TwigsDriedRecreational tea1
Twigs with fruitsDriedRecreational tea1
Rubus idaeus L., (LJUB044)мaлiнa (ляcнaя), мaлiннiк/malina (liasnaja), malinnikAerial partsDriedRecreational tea7
FreshSnack1
TeaCold1
Cough1
Healthy1
Sore throat2
FruitsCompoteCough1
DriedCold1
Compote1
Cough1
Recreational tea2
Snack1
Condiment1
Fermented with sugarProphylactics1
FreshCold2
Compote11
Heart problems1
Jam34
Juice1
Kissel1
Taste additive to strong alcohol3
Snack16
FrozenCold1
Dessert1
Frozen5
Jam1
Raw jam2
Fruit waterCold1
JamCold7
Cough2
Fever1
Sore throat4
TinctureSoporific1
Stomach ache1
ProcessedPies1
TeaCold4
Cough1
Sore throat2
LeavesDriedRecreational tea9
TeaBronchitis1
Cold6
Cough3
Sore throat1
Strengthening of organism1
TwigsDriedRecreational tea7
FreshRecreational tea1
TeaCold4
Cough2
Rhinitis1
Twigs with fruitsDriedRecreational tea1
Twigs with leavesDriedRecreational tea1
TeaCold3
Constipation1
Cough1
Pneumonia1
Rubus saxatilis L.кaмянiкa, кacцянiкa/kamianika, kascianikaFruitsFreshSnack2
Sorbus aucuparia L., (LJUB075)apaбiнa, кpacнaя paбiнa/arabina, krasnaja rabinaFlowersTeaCold1
FruitsDecoctionBone strengthening1
DriedHypotension1
Recreational tea1
FermentedWine1
Fermented with sugarProphylactics1
FreshCold1
Jam2
Snack1
Syrup1
Frozen on twigsCO-intoxication1
Raw jamCough2
TinctureHealthy2
LeavesTeaHypotension1
Salicaceae
Salix spp.вяpбa cвeчaнaя, iвa/viarba sviečanaja, ivaSeedsMassageProphylactics1
ShootsTeaCold1
Santalaceae
Viscum album L., (LJUB074)aмялa/amialaLeavesFreshOrganism cleansing1
Sapindaceae
Acer platanoides L., (LJUB131)клён/klionLeavesFreshPut under bread4
Dried, from twigs blessed on Pentecost, topical applicationWounds2
SapBoiled into syrupFodder for bees in spring1
FermentedKvass2
FreshDrink10
Snack3
ProcessedDrink1
TwigsPresence in houseAroma therapy1
Whisked in saunaHealthy1
Prophylactics2
Aesculus hippocastanum L., (LJUB111)кaштaн/kaštanFlowersDecoctionJoint pain1
Tincture, topical applicationFoot ache2
Joint pain3
Rheumatic pains2
FruitsTincture, topical applicationRheumatic pains1
Joint pain2
PericarpDecoctionVarix2
Scrophulariaceae
Verbascum thapsus L., (LJUB062)дзiвaciл/dzivasilAerial partsDecoctionPanacea1
TinctureLiver diseases1
Tincture, topical applicationJoint pain1
TeaLung diseases1
FlowersTeaStomach problems1
LeavesTinctureStomach ache1
TeaStomach ache1
RootsTeaHealthy1
Solanaceae
Datura stramonium L.шaлянeц, дуpмaн/šalianiec, durmanFruitsTinctureDiarrhoea1
Tiliaceae
Tilia cordata Mill., (LJUB089)лiпa/lipaBudsDecoctionCold2
CambiumBoiled in milkAbscess1
FlowersDriedTaste additive to strong alcohol1
Recreational tea32
FreshTaste additive to strong alcohol1
Rhinitis1
TeaCold17
Cough7
Diarrhoea1
Healthy3
Headache1
Hypertension1
Sore throat1
LeavesDriedRecreational tea1
TeaHealthy1
TwigsWhisked in saunaCold1
Healthy1
Typhaceae
Typha spp.paгoз, кaмыш/rahoz, kamyšFuzzTopical applicationBurns3
Urticaceae
Urtica dioica L., (LJUB087)кpaпiвa/krapivaAerial partsDecoctionFodder for cows1
Hair care6
Strengthening of piglets1
Thickening of blood1
Washing hair1
DriedFodder for cows1
FreshSalad3
Snack1
Soup17
Fodder for cows1
Strengthening of pigs3
ProcessedSoup1
Topical applicationBack pain1
LeavesDecoctionHair care3
DriedCondiment for soup1
FreshBread additive1
Cutlets1
Heart problems1
Organism cleansing1
Salad4
Snack4
Soup19
Condiment for salad1
Scaled, topical applicationRheumatic pains1
TeaDiabetes2
Urinary bladder1
Vesical cleansing1
Women diseases1
WashingHair care1
SeedsFreshSoup2
Urtica urens L.кpaпiвa пякучкa, кpaпiвa жыжкa/krapiva piakučka, krapiva žyžkaAerial partsDecoctionHair care1
FreshFodder for chicks1
Preservation of food2
Soup4
Fodder for turkey1
Violaceae
Viola arvensis Murray, (LJUB009)бpaткi, iвaн-ды-мap’я, бpaткi/bratki, ivan-dy-marjaAerial partsTeaFever1
FlowersBathDiathesis in children1
DriedRecreational tea1
Topical applicationEarache1
LeavesTeaCold1
Topical applicationWounds1
RootsTeaPanacea1

Local plant names are provided in both Cyrillic and Latin script

Wild plants used in food, medicinal and veterinary areas Local plant names are provided in both Cyrillic and Latin script The four plant families with the highest number of taxa and DUR were Asteraceae (12 taxa/206 DUR), Rosaceae (10 taxa/420 DUR), Ericaceae (8 taxa/501 DUR), and Betulaceae (3 taxa/170 DUR). Among the ten most diversely used taxa, the vast majority were fruit bearing shrubs (four Vaccinium genera and Rubus idaeus), trees (Betula spp., Tilia cordata and Quercus robur) and herbaceous taxa (Rumex spp. and Urtica dioica). The two most knowledgeable interviewees provided 39 and 36 taxa and 73 and 81 uses, respectively. The two least knowledgeable respondents provided only one use. The mean number of named taxa was 11.6 and mean number of DUR was 16.8. Although visually a small group of middle-aged women stand out as having more diverse knowledge, there was no statistically significant difference in the influence of age or sex of the respondents on either the number of used plants or the diversity of uses (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Distribution of the number of taxa used (a) and DUR (b) according to the age and sex of interviewees

Distribution of the number of taxa used (a) and DUR (b) according to the age and sex of interviewees

Food area

In total, 58 taxa belonging to 31 families were used for food. Of these, only 19 taxa were mentioned by more than 10% of the interviewees, while the uses of 26 taxa were mentioned by less than three people; the reliability criterion was met by 55.2% (32) of the taxa. The most represented families were Rosaceae (10 taxa), Asteraceae (6 taxa) and Ericaceae (6 taxa). The families with the most varied food uses were Ericaceae (391 DUR), Rosaceae (240 DUR), Betulaceae (95 DUR), Polygonaceae (91 DUR), and Urticaceae (61 DUR). The most diversely used food taxa overlap greatly with the top taxa overall and only Fragaria vesca and Chenopodium album replaced Quercus robur and Tilia cordata, which dominate the list of medicinal plants. Among the taxa used by at least three respondents, four were used solely for food : Chenopodium album, Oxalis acetosella, Carum carvi and Corylus avellana, but only the first of these was used by a large number of interviewees (41). Among the 124 respondents who claimed to have used wild plants for food, the two most knowledgeable used 18 taxa, numbering 30 and 29 DUR respectively. However, there were seven people who mentioned only one use of wild plants for food. The mean number of used taxa was 7.3 and the mean number of DUR was 9.08. All the DUR in the food area were distributed between 52 emic food categories, which can be attributed to 23 general food categories (Table 2). However, more than three-quarters of all DUR were distributed between six general food categories (Fig. 3).
Table 2

General categories in food area, their compostition and Use Citations

General food categoryEmic food categoryUC
Bread additiveBread additive7
Compote (87)Compote86
Additive to compote1
Condiments for food (82)Condiment for soup2
Condiment for sausages1
Condiment for sauerkraut10
Condiment for salad2
Condiment for processed birch sap2
Condiment for preserves1
Condiment for pork fat1
Condiment for pancakes1
Condiment for meat6
Condiment for lactofermented cucumbers18
Condiment for fermented birch sap3
Condiment for chees1
Condiment for bread5
Condiment for beet juice1
Condiment28
DessertDessert15
Fresh and processed drinkFresh and processed drink45
Fruit waterFruit water6
Jam (222)Raw jam8
Jam214
JuiceJuice13
KisselKissel12
Kvass Kvass40
Other (6)Instead of water1
Cutlets1
Coffee2
Beer2
PiesPies8
Preservative (9)Preservative for preserve2
Preservative for potatoes1
Preservative for kvass3
Preservative for birch sap1
Preservation of food2
Processed for winter (27)Snacks24
Preserve2
Drink1
Put under breadPut under bread17
Recreational teaRecreational tea156
SaladSalad37
Snack (223)Snack222
Ritual snack1
SoupSoup160
SyrupSyrup5
Taste additive to strong alcoholTaste additive to strong alcohol35
WineWine4
Fig. 3

Division of DUR in the food area

General categories in food area, their compostition and Use Citations Division of DUR in the food area The Informant Consensus Factor for the whole food area was 0.94 (910 use citations for 58 taxa). Only one general food category had a relatively high FIC while having only two utilized taxa: fresh and processed drinks (FIC = 0.98), represented by tree sap. The category of kvass (FIC = 0.95), which is also mainly tree sap based, contains three taxa; the same number of taxa was in the category of leaves that are put under bread (FIC = 0.88). Some of the dominate categories with a relatively wide variety of used taxa attained high FIC values; however, the majority of those contain some highly dominate taxa and about twice the number of taxa used by only a few people. Foremost in this group was the soup category (FIC = 0.96), where among seven taxa three were highly prevalent (Rumex acetosa, Chenopodium album and Urtica dioica), followed by compote (FIC = 0.88), dominated by two forest berries (Vaccinium uliginosum and Vaccinium myrtillus), and condiments (FIC = 0.84) dominated by Armoracia rusticana, Quercus robur, Carum carvi and Vaccinium oxycoccos. The most homogenous general category was jam, which possessed one of the highest FIC values (0.94). Eight of its 14 taxa, all but one of them (Taraxacum officinale) forest berries, were used by over 10 interviewees. Quite equivocal is the category of recreational tea, which contained the highest number of taxa (29) and a relatively high FIC (0.81): five taxa (Tilia cordata, Rubus idaeus, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Hypericum spp., Vaccinium myrtillus) were mentioned by 10 or more interviewees, while 18 taxa were mentioned by only one or two respondents. A similar pattern was observed for snacks (FIC = 0.87), which is highly dominated by fruits (the most numerous of them being Vaccinium myrtillus, Vaccinium oxycoccos, Vaccinium uliginosum, Fragaria vesca, and Rubus idaeus), but also contains a wide variety of occasionally mentioned taxa.

Comparison with data known about the 20th–21st centuries in food area

The number of taxa (67) outlined in [10] is greater than that recorded in this study (58). However, as we excluded from the list fruiting trees and shrubs that are mainly collected from cultivation, the difference in numbers is below 10%. The difference in taxa used is remarkable for snacks, which are well represented in [10], but rather rare in the present study. Several other uses such as Matricaria spp. and Artemisia absinthium listed in [10] as recreational teas, were used in this region, solely as medicine. In addition, Berberis vulgaris, for example, was not used, but we also did not encounter any shrubs in the region. For some taxa, the difference was on the level of different species from the same genus (Viola). More than ten taxa were added to the known modern uses of recreational teas in Belarus by the results of this study. Of these, the reliability criterion was met by seven taxa (in order of popularity): Vaccinium vitis-idaea, Hypericum spp., Vaccinium myrtillus, Fragaria vesca, Rubus caesius, Epilobium angustifolium, and Pinus sylvestris. We also documented the use of Prunus padus and Maianthemum bifolium as snacks, which have been observed elsewhere (for example in Estonia [58, 59]), but not in Belarus. We recorded some uses which were absent in recent data, but present in historical sources, such as various uses of the sap of Acer platanoides, or the use of Papaver spp. in bread and sweets. Also, the use of Chenopodium album in soups is solely referred to as “former” in [10], but this study showed that it is still used, although less intensely than in the past.

Medicinal area

Medicinal use was reported for 74 taxa belonging to 38 families. Of these, only 16 taxa were mentioned by more than 10% of the interviewees, while 19 taxa were mentioned by less than three people; the reliability criterion was met by 74.3% (55) of the taxa. The most diversely used families were Rosaceae (9 taxa/178 DUR), Asteraceae (12 taxa/151 DUR), Ericaceae (7 taxa/108 DUR), Betulaceae (2 taxa/72 DUR), Papaveraceae (2 taxa/61 DUR) and Plantaginaceae (1 taxa/52 DUR). The ten most popular taxa in this area differed from the overall top list considerably more than did wild food plants: Betula spp., Rubus idaeus, Vaccinium myrtillus, Chelidonium majus, Plantago major, Hypericum spp., Potentilla erecta, Tilia cordata, Arctium tomentosum, and Quercus robur. The medicinal area contained 15 taxa not used in the food area, which were named by more than three interviewees. Only one of these (Tanacetum vulgare), however, was mentioned by more than 10% of interviewees (14). The majority of the other 14 taxa (Tussilago farfara, Aesculus hippocastanum, Achillea millefolium, Matricaria spp., Juniperus communis, Bidens tripartita, Verbascum thapsus, Alnus spp., Frangula alnus, Trifolium spp., Equisetum arvense, Comarum palustre, Typha spp., Polygonum aviculare) are common and well-known medicinal plants in the former Soviet states. Among the 113 respondents who claimed to have used wild plants in the medicinal area, the three most knowledgeable used 29, 27 and 26 taxa, numbering 42, 34 and 54 DUR, respectively. Eleven people named only one use of wild plants in the medicinal area. The mean number of used taxa was 6.2 and the mean number of DUR was 8.6. All the DUR in the medicinal area were distributed between 122 emic categories, which can be attributed to 16 general categories related to health and wellbeing (Table 3). However, 85% of all DUR are distributed between six general categories (Fig. 4).
Table 3

General categories in medicinal area, included emic categories and Use Citations

General categories in medicinal area (sum of DUR)Emic disease categoriesUC
Cardiovascular (82)Vesical cleaning1
Varix4
Thickening of blood1
Promotes bloodstream2
Hypotension3
Hypertension24
Haemostatic4
Heart problem34
Heart disease9
Bad blood1
Anaemia1
Cosmetics (23)Rejuvenating2
Hair care19
Dandruff1
Beauty procedure1
Culture bound (3)Fright1
For women to be strong against men1
Evil eye1
Dermatological (98)Wounds62
Warts10
Tumour1
Skin diseases4
Scabies1
Rotten wounds1
Inflammation processes1
Foot hatching3
Eczema2
Cuts11
Burns7
Allergy1
Abscess4
Endocrinological (8)Thyroid glands2
Pancreas1
Diabetes5
Gastrointestinal (180)Stomach ache69
Stomach problems7
Low acidity1
Liver diseases17
Haemorrhoids1
Gastritis4
Gastric ulcer7
Gall stones1
Dysentery4
Diarrhoea63
Constipation4
Bile neutralizer1
Bile deficiency1
General health (182)Vitamins4
Washing hair1
Tonus support1
Tonic1
Tick prevention1
Strengthening of organism4
Prophylactics26
Panacea32
Pain1
Organism cleansing7
Inflammation processes5
Immune boosting7
Healthy55
Hangover1
Foot ache1
Fever3
Disinfectant3
Diathesis in children12
CO-intoxication2
Cancer3
Bone strengthening1
Body cleansing5
Aroma therapy1
Appetizer3
Allergy2
Gynaecological (7)Women diseases6
To increase milk production in woman1
Infection (14)Tuberculosis2
Scabies1
Helminthic infection9
Chickenpox1
Anti-microbic1
Musculoskeletal (91)Joint pain50
Rheumatic pains17
Knee ache2
Adhesion of bones1
Foot ache7
Bruises3
Painful place3
Back pain7
Aching legs1
Nephrological and urological (40)Urinating problems1
Urinary bladder2
Kidney stones1
Kidney diseases29
Diuretic7
Neurological (29)Soporific3
Sedative1
Nerves2
Insomnia1
Headache11
Epilepsy4
Convulses1
Calming6
Ophthalmological (21)Improve vision5
Eye problems16
Oral and dental (7)Toothache1
Teething pain in children1
Periodontitis1
Gingival diseases1
Gingival bleeding2
Gingival wound1
Outer influence (1)Antitoxic1
Respiratory (172)Sore throat22
Rhinitis2
Pneumonia2
Lung diseases2
Expectorant1
Earache1
Cough42
Cold94
Bronchitis6
Fig. 4

Division of DUR in the medicinal area

General categories in medicinal area, included emic categories and Use Citations Division of DUR in the medicinal area The Informant Consensus Factor for the whole medicinal area was 0.92 (698 use citations for 74 taxa). All general categories in the medicinal area had lower FIC values and only seven general categories had a FIC over 0.7. The category of respiratory illnesses with a FIC value of 0.84 (26 taxa) was clearly dominated by two taxa: Rubus idaeus and Tilia cordata, both used primarily to treat cold, cough and sore throat; two more taxa (Hypericum spp. and Pinus sylvestris) were named by more than 10 people and used mainly against cold. Among the rest there were three taxa used in a certain mode that met the reliability criterion: tea made from the aerial parts of Thymus serpyllum and Ledum palustre or leaves of Tussilago farfara to alleviate cough; 54% of taxa in the respiratory category were used by less than three respondents. The category of ophthalmological diseases had a similarly high FIC (0.84), but one of the smallest use citation numbers (20). This category also had a very small number of used taxa (four), dominated by one taxon: Vaccinium myrtillus, which is considered good for eye problems and believed to improve vision. Dermatological diseases (FIC = 0.81) contained 21 taxa, two of which were dominant: Plantago major with the well-known topical application of fresh leaves on wounds, burns, cuts and abscesses, and Chelidonium majus with a wide variety of applications and modes of use, including the topical application of sap on wounds (said to be welded) and warts, as well as treating other skin diseases and injuries (like eczema, cuts, burns) by applying leaves, and a decoction of the aerial parts for external application to treat eczema and also washing wounds. As for the other taxa uses in the dermatology category, the reliability criterion was met only by the use of a tincture made from the buds of Betula spp. for cleansing wounds and the topical application of the fuzz of Typha spp. to treat burns. All of the remaining taxa used in the dermatological category (including the internationally well-known haemostatic Achillea millefolium) were mentioned by less than five people and did not meet the reliability criterion for a specific application mode. The gastrointestinal category (FIC = 0.77) contained 37 taxa (almost half of them were mentioned by less than three respondents). The fruits of two of the three most dominant taxa, Vaccinium myrtillus and Pyrus pyraster, were utilized in a wide variety of use modes mainly to treat diarrhoea. A tincture made from the roots of Potentilla erecta was primarily used to alleviate stomach ache. Of the remaining taxa-use combinations, only a few met the reliability criterion: seven taxa used against three emic disease categories. The most common of these was diarrhoea, which was treated with a tea or decoction of the aerial parts of Artemisia absinthium and Tanacetum vulgare, the cone-like fruits of Alnus spp., and the bark of Quercus robur as well as a tincture made from the buds or catkins of Betula spp. The other emic disease categories that met the reliability criterion were stomach ache, which was treated with tea made from the aerial parts of Hypericum spp. and a tincture of Betula spp., and the use of a tea made from Helichrysum arenarium to treat liver disease. The category of general health (FIC = 0.75) contained the highest number of taxa in one general category (46). It was dominated by four taxa: Betula spp. (used mainly as a prophylactic and healthy whisking in sauna, but also a tincture made from the buds as a panacea), Hypericum spp. (tea as a panacea), Quercus robur L. (wellbeing and prophylactic whisking in sauna) and Chelidonium majus (decoction used as a bath against diathesis in children and for body cleansing). Of the other combinations of taxa and uses, the reliability criterion was met by four taxa used on three occasions: an alcoholic infusion of the roots of Potentilla erecta and a tea made from the inflorescences of Tilia cordata were considered healthy, a bath of the decoction of Bidens tripartita was used against diathesis in children and a tea made from the fruits of Rosa spp. for boosting the immune system. The musculoskeletal category (FIC = 0.74) contained 22 taxa, three of which were used by more than ten people. The fresh leaves of Arctium tomentosum were mainly topically applied to alleviate joint and foot pain. A tincture of Syringa vulgaris was applied on rheumatic and joint pains and a tincture made from the inflorescences or fruits of Aesculus hippocastanum was used for the same purpose. Of the remaining taxa only two more met the reliability criterion: Taraxacum officinale was used in a variety of modes, and a tincture of Comarum palustre topically applied to alleviate joint pain. Within other general categories, only a few uses met the reliability criterion. In the cardiovascular category this included a tincture made from the fruits of Viburnum opulus used against hypertension, as well as a tea or decoction of the aerial parts or roots of Valeriana officinalis and a tea made from the fruits of Crataegus spp. or the areal parts of Hypericum spp. to treat heart problems. In the nephrological and urological category the leaves of Vaccinium vitis-idaea or the fruits of Rosa spp. and a tincture made from the buds of Betula spp. or roots of Potentilla erecta were used to treat kidney diseases. The cosmetics category was represented mainly by the decoction of the aerial parts or leaves of Urtica dioica and the decoction of the roots and flowers of Arctium tomentosum for washing hair. The only use that met the reliability criterion in the neurological category was the topical application of the leaves of Plantago major to alleviate headache.

Veterinary area

Twenty-three taxa belonging to 17 families were used for ethnoveterinary purposes and as fodder. Only three families were represented by more than one taxon: Asteraceae (five taxa), Betulaceae (two taxa), and Urticaceae (2 taxa); whereas the most diversely used taxa were Asteraceae (30 DUR), Urticaceae (9 DUR) and Fagaceae (6 DUR). All the uses within the veterinary area were mentioned by less than 10% of the respondents, and only six taxa (Artemisia absinthium, Urtica dioica, Taraxacum officinale, Quercus robur, Veratrum lobelianum, and Hypericum spp.) were used by more than two people; therefore the reliability criterion was met by only a small percentage of taxa (26%). Three taxa were uniquely used in this area: Lathraea squamaria and Phleum spp. were both named by one interviewee and Veratrum lobelianum was mentioned by three persons. Seven taxa (Achillea millefolium, Alnus spp., Chelidonium majus, Equisetum arvense, Juniperus communis, Tanacetum vulgare and Trifolium spp.) overlap with taxa used for healing humans but not with those used for human food; all but the last were used by only one person. Among the 34 people who claimed to have used wild plants in the veterinary area, the two most knowledgeable used six and three taxa, numbering eight and six DUR, respectively. Seventeen people (50% of all respondents who mentioned the veterinary use of wild plants) named only a single use of wild plants. The mean number of used taxa was 1.6 and the mean number of DUR was 2.0. All the DUR in the ethnoveterinary area were distributed between 33 emic categories, which were attributed to three main general categories related to the healing of animals and to one category for fodder; 21% of DUR belonged to diverse emic categories of which not a single use met the reliability criterion (Table 4, Fig. 5).
Table 4

General categories in veterinary area, included emic veterinary categories and Use Citations

Food categoryEmic veterinary categoriesUC
Diarrhoea (20)Diarrhoea in calves2
Diarrhoea in chicken1
Diarrhoea in cows10
Diarrhoea in pigs8
Fodder (21)Fodder for bees in spring1
Fodder for calves1
Fodder for chicks1
Fodder for cows3
Fodder for cows, to increase milk production1
Fodder for home animals2
Fodder for pigs5
Fodder for rabbits4
Fodder for turkey3
Other (14)Appetizer for cows2
Bacterial diseases in bees1
Blood in urine in cows1
Cold in domesticated animals1
Cuts in domesticated animals1
Disinfectant for home animals1
Good for cows1
Good for horses1
Helminthic infection in cows1
Helminthic infection in pigs1
When piglets do not go to their mother1
Vitamins for cows1
Wounds in cows1
Rumination problems (7)Rumination problems in cows6
Rumination problems in goats1
Strengthening of animals (6)Strengthening of cows1
Strengthening of piglets1
Strengthening of pigs4
Fig. 5

Division of DUR in the veterinary area

General categories in veterinary area, included emic veterinary categories and Use Citations Division of DUR in the veterinary area The Informant Consensus Factor for the whole veterinary area was low 0.67 (68 use citations for 23 taxa). However, only one general veterinary category (rumination problems) had a FIC equivalent to the FIC of the area, with two taxa (Artemisia absinthium and Veratrum lobelianum) meeting the reliability criterion for this specific use. One other category, gastrointestinal, had FIC = 0.63 (eight taxa all used against diarrhoea) with two taxa meeting reliability criterion: Artemisia absinthium for pigs and cows (and chickens) and Quercus robur for pigs and cows. The remaining categories had relatively low Informant Consensus Factors (0.25–0.5). Among the specific taxa meeting the reliability criterion within a specific emic category were dry Urtica dioica aerial parts added to fodder to strengthen pigs and fodder for cows, Taraxacum officinale used as fodder for pigs, Artemisia absinthium as fodder for rabbits and turkey.

Overlap between areas

Figure 6 illustrates the overlap of taxa used in all three areas. Forty-seven taxa were used in both the food and medicinal areas, which equates to an overlap of 55.3%. The overlap between medicinal and veterinary areas is only 27% (20 taxa), but given that almost 87% of all taxa used in the veterinary area are also used in the medicinal area indicates that there is considerable overlap here as well (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Overlap between taxa used in food, medicinal and veterinary areas

Overlap between taxa used in food, medicinal and veterinary areas Thirty wild plant taxa had more widespread use, that is they were used by at least 14 (approximately 10%) of the interviewees (Table 5). A comparison of the plants in the food and medicinal areas shows that the more widespread the use, the more there were people using one plant in both areas (most notably Vaccinium myrtillus, Betula spp. and Rubus idaeus), while there were specific taxa represented in both areas but predominantly used in only one, such as Rumex spp. for food and Plantago major as medicine (Fig. 7). The prevalence of plants used in the food area is clearly seen among the 20 taxa with the highest number of DUR, as medicinal use prevails in only three taxa (Plantago major, Potentilla erecta, Hypericum spp.) (Fig. 8).
Table 5

Taxa used by at least 10% of the interveiwees

TaxaU n = 134DURF_U n = 124F_DURM_U n = 113M_DUROverlap F_U/M_UV_U n = 34V_DUR
Vaccinium myrtillus 10822495169415528
Rubus idaeus 8517069108336217
Betula spp.73154598736662211
Rumex spp.71927191111
Vaccinium vitis-idaea 64117549118268
Urtica dioica 578347551621667
Tilia cordata 52733435283810
Vaccinium oxycoccos 517748668115
Vaccinium uliginosum 48694663462
Fragaria vesca 45624053590
Hypericum spp.436215153244433
Chenopodium album 4141414100012
Quercus robur 406630351925956
Plantago major 3954113952111
Armoracia rusticana 37463239570
Taraxacum officinale 334418191619156
Viburnum opulus 2947182415234
Potentilla erecta 28444425401
Rubus caesius 28392837121
Arctium tomentosum 27371127361
Allium ursinum 22282127110
Rosa spp.2133121411192
Pinus sylvestris 20437101532211
Syringa vulgaris 20212318180
Acer platanoides 1927162056211
Artemisia absinthium 17281181011117
Pyrus pyraster 163111131116622
Thymus serpyllum 141688781
Sorbus aucuparia 1417569110
Tanacetum vulgare 14180014180

Abbreviations: U Users across areas, DUR Detailed Use Reports across areas, F_U Users in Food area, F_DUR Detailed Use Reports in Food area, M_U Users in Medicinal area, M_DUR Detailed Use Reports in Medicinal area, Overlap F_U/M_U No of users who used the same taxa in both food and medicinal areas, V_U Users in Veterinary area, V_DUR Detailed Use Reports in Veterinary area

Fig. 7

3D scatter plot of the overlapping use of 30 plants mentioned by at least 10% of the interviewees in the food and medicinal areas; designed in R [65]

Fig. 8

The twenty most intensively used taxa and the distribution of DUR between the three areas

Taxa used by at least 10% of the interveiwees Abbreviations: U Users across areas, DUR Detailed Use Reports across areas, F_U Users in Food area, F_DUR Detailed Use Reports in Food area, M_U Users in Medicinal area, M_DUR Detailed Use Reports in Medicinal area, Overlap F_U/M_U No of users who used the same taxa in both food and medicinal areas, V_U Users in Veterinary area, V_DUR Detailed Use Reports in Veterinary area 3D scatter plot of the overlapping use of 30 plants mentioned by at least 10% of the interviewees in the food and medicinal areas; designed in R [65] The twenty most intensively used taxa and the distribution of DUR between the three areas

Used parts and modes of use

Across all areas fruits and seeds were the most commonly used parts of a plant (36%), followed by leaves (18%), aerial parts (17%), flowers and inflorescences (8%), sap (6%), roots (5%) and twigs (3%), and all other parts (7%). In the food area, fruits alone (without seeds) had an even greater share (48%), as did the use of sap (8%), whereas aerial parts (11%) and flowers with inflorescences (4%) were less important. In the medicinal area, aerial parts and fruits dominated the list, both at 20%, and the proportion of roots (8%), twigs (6%), buds and cones (both 3%), and bark (2%) was also increased compared to their distribution in all three areas combined. The veterinary area is the only area in which the use of leaves had a considerably smaller proportion than across all areas (4%); whereas the use of aerial parts (63%) and bark (6%) had much greater proportions. The vast majority of use modes across the areas are divided among three possibilities: plants are used either fresh (41%), as a tea or decoction (20%), or dried (12%, including plants dried for recreational tea). In the food area, plants are primarily used fresh (70%), and less often dried (19%), frozen (4%), fermented (4%) or otherwise processed (3%, mainly preserved for winter in the form of compotes, etc.). In the medicinal area, uses are more diverse (about 50 different use modes in contrast to less than 15 in the food area); tea is the most common mode of use (33%), followed by the topical application of fresh plants (13%), tincture (4%), drunk tincture (10%) and decoction (9%). Fresh plants are eaten in only 6% of DUR, while 4% of DUR in the medicinal area refers to whisking in sauna. The eating of dried plants (4%) and jams (3%) as well as making baths (3%, from decoctions) are also quite common. The remarkable presence (in total over 6%) of different food categories (jam, compote, fermented sap, etc.) in the medicinal area stresses the interrelated nature of the two areas. In the veterinary area the primary use modes are decoction (38%) and fresh (15%, mainly fodder), as well as fresh or dried taxa added to fodder (both 12%).

Past and temporary uses

Seventeen percent of the DUR used in the food and veterinary areas and 10% of the ones from the medicinal area were claimed to have been used only in the past (14% across all areas). Past uses in the food area followed the pattern of general food use, with some exceptions: the most prevalent uses abandoned in the past were snacks and soups (both 25% of all past uses), followed by jams (13%) and recreational teas (5%). Although on a general level past uses were distributed more or less proportionally (one or two uses here and there), some past uses in the food area constituted a considerable number of the uses in specific emic categories: more than half the uses of soup made from Chenopodium album and a bit less than half the reports of soup made from Urtica dioica. In addition, two-thirds of the uses of the leaves of Quercus robur which are put under bread during baking and snacking of the leaves of Oxalis acetosella were attributed to the past. Past uses in the medicinal area are either treatments of childhood diseases (by the mother of interviewees), or uses which respondents had abandoned in later life due to reduced access to the plant (including a decrease of personal mobility) or limited need for healing (for example, cold and some childhood diseases). The majority of past uses are related to general health (mainly prophylactics) and gastrointestinal issues, followed by the dermatological and respiratory categories. The pattern follows quite closely the general distribution of the categories in the medicinal area. Some exceptions, however, exist; for example, the past healing of wounds with leaves from Acer platanoides twigs blessed in a church on Pentecost seems to be one of the few remnants of the so-called magical thinking in the quite practical realm of modern domestic medicine in Belarus. A few other ritual practices recalled from the past include: the collecting of Vaccinium myrtillus fruits, strictly on St. John’s day, and then drying and storing them apart from other fruits, to be later used to alleviate stomach ache; or wearing dried roots of Acorus calamus underneath the clothing for repelling the evil eye. In the veterinary area a few abandoned uses were related to childhood, while others to the past when domestic animals were kept. The majority of past uses, however, in both medicinal and veterinary areas are quite similar to those still used today. The proportion of uses that were claimed as temporary was relatively small (1% across all areas). However, they also deserve closer attention, as there might be many more of them; a limitation of the method employed in this study is that it did not allow sufficient time for recalling temporary uses. In the food area temporary uses were related either to short-term food shortages in war time (acorns of Quercus robur as a bread additive, and fresh leaves of Urtica dioica and young cones of Pinus sylvestris as snacks), or taste trials (fermentation of Betula spp. sap, jam from young cones of Pinus sylvestris, salad made from Taraxacum officinale leaves and popular jam made from the flowers of Taraxacum officinale). Temporary medicinal uses were mostly related to the treatment of young children (the need disappeared when children got older), such as the use of fruits and twigs of Rubus idaeus to treat cold and cough, jam of Taraxacum officinale against sore throat and bronchitis, fresh fruits of Viburnum opulus against cold, leaves of Tussilago farfara against cough, aerial parts of Bidens tripartita for diathesis, and decoction of aerial parts Chelidonium majus to treat chickenpox infection–a use claimed to be prescribed by a doctor. A few uses also related to temporary illness of the interviewee or his or her relatives, such as the use of the leaves of Vaccinium vitis-idaea to treat urinary problems or the twigs of Betula spp. or Quercus robur in a prophylactic bath. One middle aged woman described a ritual for treating her son for epilepsy with the buds of Betula spp.: I went to the crossroad at three o’clock in the morning, gathered buds from nine birches; the next morning I brought nine anthills, covered them with hot water and left them in a hot place for nine days to ferment; I later bathed my son in it. Given the details of the ritual described, this seems like a historical use tried out in the time of need. However, the woman added that she read about it in a magazine and decided to try it out, and it helped, he did not perish. The majority of temporary uses are common in the regional ethnomedicine or official medicine, and in the food area, so in fact those were temporary uses only for specific interviewees.

Popular attitudes towards the use of wild plants

Quite often, while asking about the use of wild plants, we encountered answers such as: I know nothing, I am too old, I don’t remember or you should ask someone who knows, we don’t deal with such things. It appeared that people did not consider this kind of knowledge as something worth discussing. After further inquiry, people usually first mentioned forest fruits and all the preserves that they make with them, followed by recreational teas, sometimes trying to change the subject, and also stressing the medicinal properties of the same or other teas (sometimes just knowing the uses, but not really applying the tea for that purpose–and thus not counting as a valid record). Soups and other hot dishes were recalled readily, although younger people seem to be ashamed of knowing how to cook nettle soup, as its use is somehow related with poverty. While condiments constituted a remarkable category, we literally had to name all potential application possibilities (strong alcohol, preservation of cucumbers, etc.), to help people recall their uses. By the end of the interview we often noticed a shift in the attitude towards wild plants and sometimes even the realization of the importance of the subject and interviewees knowledge about it. Men, talking about the use of wild plants, often referred to women, especially regarding food plants, but in fact there are many quite knowledgeable men as well, even if they do not prepare food or medicate family–they at least know what is done in their family. One of the tasks of men is foraging, especially for tree sap, as well as making home-made alcohol, although officially both activities are illegal. While asking about home-made vodka (and plants soaked in it), we sometimes had to refer to other villagers (without mentioning names)–after hearing that neighbours had taken pride in their moonshine and all it contains, they gladly showed their “harvest”. Some people remarked that wild plants were useful as long as they were clean, and that now radiation has taken away all their good qualities: what can you get from a plant after radiation. Others mentioned that they cultivate all they need, and that earlier (when they were younger) it was easier to just go and collect plants in the wild, but now it is easier to grow them in the garden. Yet some other people said that they never had time to collect in the wild, as work in the collective farm took all their time.

Discussion

The dominance of Rosaceae and Asteraceae is common in many parts of Europe (see [4] and the references within), and the high number of uses of Ericaceae may be due to the intensive use of forest fruits in both the food and medicinal areas, which may be peculiar to the relatively Nordic location where such taxa grow, seeing that in Estonia the use of Ericaceae is also quite widespread [8, 54]. The low percentage of Lamiaceae, however, is surprizing and may be due to its exclusion from the sample those taxa that were cultivated for food and medicinal purposes. The overlap of the food and medicinal areas (over 55%) is considerably larger than the nearly 40% found in a similar comparison described in [4], which can probably be explained by the absence of cultivated species in this study and the fact that we also included a wider general health category. However, such maximization of the versatility of limited resources is evident, although not emphasized, in many different post-Soviet (or post-socialist) regions (see for example [5, 6, 60]). While it is not possible to compare the mean number of used plants per person for plants in the medicinal area, the mean number per person of wild plants used in the food area in the region (7.3) was nearly three times lower than the similar value obtained for Saaremaa, Estonia (19.9) [61], but close to the value recorded among Ukrainians living in Romania (7.7) [62]. The FIC for the wild food area (0.94) is, however, slightly higher than the value observed for Estonia (0.91) [61]. The category of salad in the food area deserves specific attention. While not very numerous (only ten taxa), and with a relatively low FIC (0.74), it contains one dominant taxa Allium ursinum which is a protected species. Also, the use of Stellaria media and Plantago major seems to be a remnant from times of food shortage. Comparison with the only publication providing qualitative data on the recent use of wild food plants in the whole of Belarus [10] shows remarkable overlap within the uses that are numerously represented in this study. There are a considerable number of differences among the seldom mentioned taxa or uses, considering the fact that some of the previously published results were collected from the neighbouring region. This indicates that despite the homogenization of the population during the Soviet era, regional differences may still exist. The high proportion of snacks in [10] and their relatively low occurrence in this study may be attributed to the special emphasis of the questionnaires used by the authors of [10] and the particular interest of their respondents (future botanists) towards nature. However, the reason may also be related to regional cultural differences or, more likely, a considerable decrease of unintended contact with nature, as our interviewees repeatedly stressed that they rarely snacked on anything but berries in the wild. The temporal division of uses (modest share of past uses, especially within the medicinal area) does not directly support the popular claim that people used more wild plants in the past. However, while folk history is the only applicable method for recalling past uses when there is no historical data available, it is not fully reliable. For example, it is relatively irrelevant to talk about the persistent freezing of wild fruits for preservation purposes, as deep-freezers only became available in the 1980s. However, as this time period is perceived as “long ago” by our interviewees, some of them referred to such a method of preservation as everlasting. Uses in the medicinal area seem to be more susceptible to literary influence and more diverse in the details of use. For example, inserting the fruits of Vaccinium oxycoccos into one’s ear to treat CO-intoxication is one of the few historical medicinal uses of those fruits in Estonia, first recorded in 1984 [63], which most likely originated from one shared literary source. However, while people often acknowledged that they took one or another medicinal uses of wild plants from newspapers or special popular magazines like “Home Doctor”, they also frequently admitted that those or similar remedies were already used by their mothers or grandmothers, so the use of literature is perceived rather as a “refresher” of memory or an “official” acknowledgment of the correctness of the traditional practice (cf. [64]). Nevertheless, some uses are clearly influenced by media, such as the making of jam from Taraxacum officinale, which was popularly advertised in the 1980s (cf. [42]). The wide variety of preparation modes and used parts for the most popularly used plants signals either extensive individual experimentation within households or the past presence of a very rich and diverse traditional/regional use of wild plants which has been eroded.

Conclusions

This study examined the use of wild plants in the food, medicinal and veterinary areas within a small territory limited to one village council in Belarus. It contributes to the documentation of the local use of wild plants and to the understanding of the complex relationship between different use areas of wild plants. We discovered relatively high overlap in the taxa used in the food and medicinal areas and an even higher overlap between the medicinal and veterinary areas. As the majority of taxa with overlapping uses belonged also to the most utilized plants, there appears to be a clear tendency to use plants in several different areas once they are brought into the home. While the number of wild taxa used is relatively high, the mean number of taxa used per person is quite low, which indicates the minor importance of wild plants in the respective areas in the investigated region of Belarus.
  11 in total

1.  Ethnobotanical investigation of 'wild' food plants used by rice farmers in Kalasin, Northeast Thailand.

Authors:  Gisella S Cruz-Garcia; Lisa L Price
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  Change in medical plant use in Estonian ethnomedicine: a historical comparison between 1888 and 1994.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand; Raivo Kalle
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.360

3.  A reservoir of ethnobotanical knowledge informs resilient food security and health strategies in the Balkans.

Authors:  Cassandra L Quave; Andrea Pieroni
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 15.793

4.  Perceived reasons for changes in the use of wild food plants in Saaremaa, Estonia.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  The importance of a border: Medical, veterinary, and wild food ethnobotany of the Hutsuls living on the Romanian and Ukrainian sides of Bukovina.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand; Andrea Pieroni
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.360

6.  Traditional food uses of wild plants among the Gorani of South Kosovo.

Authors:  Andrea Pieroni; Renata Sõukand; Cassandra L Quave; Avni Hajdari; Behxhet Mustafa
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Patients' webs of relations in the medical landscapes of Central Ukraine.

Authors:  Iwona Kołodziejska-Degórska
Journal:  Anthropol Med       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  Medicinal and local food plants in the south of Alava (Basque Country, Spain).

Authors:  Rocίo Alarcόn; Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana; Caroline Priestley; Ramón Morales; Michael Heinrich
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.360

9.  Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński's questionnaire of 1883 to the present.

Authors:  Łukasz Łuczaj; Piotr Köhler; Ewa Pirożnikow; Maja Graniszewska; Andrea Pieroni; Tanya Gervasi
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 10.  Plants used for making recreational tea in Europe: a review based on specific research sites.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand; Cassandra L Quave; Andrea Pieroni; Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana; Javier Tardío; Raivo Kalle; Łukasz Łuczaj; Ingvar Svanberg; Valeria Kolosova; Laura Aceituno-Mata; Gorka Menendez-Baceta; Iwona Kołodziejska-Degórska; Ewa Pirożnikow; Rolandas Petkevičius; Avni Hajdari; Behxhet Mustafa
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.733

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sociocultural and ecological factors influencing management of edible and non-edible plants: the case of Ixcatlán, Mexico.

Authors:  Selene Rangel-Landa; Alejandro Casas; Eduardo García-Frapolli; Rafael Lira
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  Fischer's Plants in folk beliefs and customs: a previously unknown contribution to the ethnobotany of the Polish-Lithuanian-Belarusian borderland.

Authors:  Monika Kujawska; Piotr Klepacki; Łukasz Łuczaj
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  Dining Tables Divided by a Border: The Effect of Socio-Political Scenarios on Local Ecological Knowledge of Romanians Living in Ukrainian and Romanian Bukovina.

Authors:  Nataliya Stryamets; Giulia Mattalia; Andrea Pieroni; Ihor Khomyn; Renata Sõukand
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-08

4.  Unity in diversity-food plants and fungi of Sakartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasus.

Authors:  Rainer W Bussmann; Narel Y Paniagua Zambrana; Inayat Ur Rahman; Zaal Kikvidze; Shalva Sikharulidze; David Kikodze; David Tchelidze; Manana Khutsishvili; Ketevan Batsatsashvili
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.733

5.  Pipes and Potions: Testing the Efficacy of European Folk Preparation Methods for Anticholinergic Solanaceae Plants.

Authors:  Karsten Fatur; Matjaž Ravnikar; Vitjan Fras; Samo Kreft
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04

6.  Homogenisation of Biocultural Diversity: Plant Ethnomedicine and Its Diachronic Change in Setomaa and Võromaa, Estonia, in the Last Century.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand; Raivo Kalle; Andrea Pieroni
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26

7.  Use of cultivated plants and non-plant remedies for human and animal home-medication in Liubań district, Belarus.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand; Yanina Hrynevich; Julia Prakofjewa; Tatsiana Valodzina; Iryna Vasilyeva; Jury Paciupa; Aliaksandra Shrubok; Aliaksei Hlushko; Yana Knureva; Yulia Litvinava; Siarhei Vyskvarka; Hanna Silivonchyk; Alena Paulava; Mare Kõiva; Raivo Kalle
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Ethnopharmaceutical knowledge in Samogitia region of Lithuania: where old traditions overlap with modern medicine.

Authors:  Zivile Pranskuniene; Roberta Dauliute; Andrius Pranskunas; Jurga Bernatoniene
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.733

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.