Literature DB >> 29084561

Sociocultural and ecological factors influencing management of edible and non-edible plants: the case of Ixcatlán, Mexico.

Selene Rangel-Landa1, Alejandro Casas2, Eduardo García-Frapolli1, Rafael Lira3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying factors influencing plant management allows understanding how processes of domestication operate. Uncertain availability of resources is a main motivation for managing edible plants, but little is known about management motives of non-edible resources like medicinal and ceremonial plants. We hypothesized that uncertain availability of resources would be a general factor motivating their management, but other motives could operate simultaneously. Uncertainty and risk might be less important motives in medicinal than in edible plants, while for ceremonial plants, symbolic and spiritual values would be more relevant.
METHODS: We inventoried edible, medicinal, and ceremonial plants in Ixcatlán, Oaxaca, Mexico, and conducted in-depth studies with 20 native and naturalized species per use type; we documented their cultural importance and abundance by interviewing 25 households and sampling vegetation in 33 sites. Consumption amounts and preferences were studied through surveys and free listings with 38 interviewees. Management intensity and risk indexes were calculated through PCA and their relation analyzed through regression analyses. Canonical methods allowed identifying the main sociocultural and ecological factors influencing management of plants per use type.
RESULTS: Nearly 64, 63, and 55% of all ceremonial, edible, and medicinal wild plants recorded, respectively, are managed in order to maintain or increase their availability, embellishing environments, and because of ethical reasons and curiosity. Management intensity was higher in edible plants under human selection and associated with risk. Management of ceremonial and medicinal plants was not associated with indexes of risk or uncertainty in their availability. Other sociocultural and ecological factors influence management intensity, the most important being reciprocal relations and abundance perception.
CONCLUSIONS: Plant management through practices and collectively regulated strategies is strongly related to control of risk and uncertainty in edible plants, compared with medicinal and ceremonial plants, in which reciprocal interchanges, curiosity, and spiritual values are more important factors. Understanding how needs, worries, social relations, and ethical values influence management decisions is important to understand processes of constructing management strategies and how domestication could be started in the past and are operated at the present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cultural importance; Domestication; Ixcatec; Plant management; Reciprocity interchange; Risk management; Spiritual values and plant management; Tehuacán Valley

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29084561      PMCID: PMC5663152          DOI: 10.1186/s13002-017-0185-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed        ISSN: 1746-4269            Impact factor:   2.733


  11 in total

1.  Ixcatec ethnoecology: plant management and biocultural heritage in Oaxaca, Mexico.

Authors:  Selene Rangel-Landa; Alejandro Casas; Erandi Rivera-Lozoya; Ignacio Torres-García; Mariana Vallejo-Ramos
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.733

2.  The cultural mind: environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations.

Authors:  Scott Atran; Douglas L Medin; Norbert O Ross
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Bad Year Economics. Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty. Paul Halstead and John O'Shea, Eds. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989. x, 145 pp., illus. $49.50. New Directions in Archaeology.

Authors:  B Winterhalder
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Multi-functionality of the few: current and past uses of wild plants for food and healing in Liubań region, Belarus.

Authors:  Renata Sõukand; Yanina Hrynevich; Iryna Vasilyeva; Julia Prakofjewa; Yuriy Vnukovich; Jury Paciupa; Aliaksei Hlushko; Yana Knureva; Yulia Litvinava; Siarhei Vyskvarka; Hanna Silivonchyk; Alena Paulava; Mare Kõiva; Raivo Kalle
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 5.  In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica.

Authors:  Alejandro Casas; Adriana Otero-Arnaiz; Edgar Pérez-Negrón; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Influence of traditional markets on plant management in the Tehuacán Valley.

Authors:  Yaayé Arellanes; Alejandro Casas; Anselmo Arellanes; Ernesto Vega; José Blancas; Mariana Vallejo; Ignacio Torres; Selene Rangel-Landa; Ana I Moreno; Leonor Solís; Edgar Pérez-Negrón
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.733

7.  TEK, local perceptions of risk, and diversity of management practices of Agave inaequidens in Michoacán, Mexico.

Authors:  Ignacio Torres; José Blancas; Alejandro León; Alejandro Casas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico.

Authors:  José Blancas; Alejandro Casas; Diego Pérez-Salicrup; Javier Caballero; Ernesto Vega
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  Plant management and biodiversity conservation in Náhuatl homegardens of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico.

Authors:  Carolina Larios; Alejandro Casas; Mariana Vallejo; Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles; José Blancas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.733

10.  Vulnerability and risk management of Agave species in the Tehuacán Valley, México.

Authors:  América Delgado-Lemus; Ignacio Torres; José Blancas; Alejandro Casas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.733

View more
  4 in total

1.  Do emotions influence the motivations and preferences of keepers of stingless bees?

Authors:  Roberta Monique Amâncio Carvalho; Celso Feitosa Martins; Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves; Ângelo Giuseppe Chaves Alves
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 2.  Use and management of wild fauna by people of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley and surrounding areas, Mexico.

Authors:  Mariana Zarazúa-Carbajal; Michelle Chávez-Gutiérrez; Yessica Romero-Bautista; Selene Rangel-Landa; Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles; Luis Fernando Alvarado Ramos; Sandra E Smith; José Blancas; Ek Del Val; María Del Coro Arizmendi; Alejandro Casas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 3.  Actualized inventory of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in Oaxaca, Mexico.

Authors:  Cruz-Pérez Alejandra Lucía; Barrera-Ramos Jacqueline; Bernal-Ramírez Luis Alberto; Bravo-Avilez David; Rendón-Aguilar Beatriz
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.733

4.  Cultural, economic, and ecological factors influencing management of wild plants and mushrooms interchanged in Purépecha markets of Mexico.

Authors:  Berenice Farfán-Heredia; Alejandro Casas; Selene Rangel-Landa
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.733

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.