| Literature DB >> 28178309 |
Peer Schrapers1, Julia Ilina2, Christina M Gregg2, Stefan Mebs1, Jae-Hun Jeoung2, Holger Dau1, Holger Dobbek2, Michael Haumann1.
Abstract
Bacteria integrate CO2 reduction and acetylEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28178309 PMCID: PMC5298270 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Crystal structure of ACS from C. hydrogenoformans.
PDB entry 1RU3, 2.2 Å resolution [15]. Inset, A-cluster in magnification (color code: green, Ni; orange, Fe; yellow, S; red, O; blue, N; grey, C; protons are omitted for clarity). The (distorted) square-planar Ni ions are denoted proximal (p) and distal (d). X marks a ligand modelled as oxygen.
Metal content of ACSCh samples from TXRF.
| ACSCh | concentration [mM] (metal per protein) | ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | Fe | Ni | Zn | Ni/Fe | Zn/Fe |
| oxNMC | 5.2 (4) | 1.5 (1.2) | 1.1 (0.8) | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| oxC | 6.5 (4) | 2.7 (1.7) | 1.2 (0.7) | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| redNMCMe | 4.3 (4) | 1.5 (1.4) | 0.9 (0.8) | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| redCMe | 5.9 (4) | 2.3 (1.6) | 0.9 (0.6) | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| redNMCCO | 4.4 (4) | 1.4 (1.3) | 1.0 (0.9) | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| redCCO | 5.2 (4) | 1.9 (1.5) | 0.8 (0.6) | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| redNMC | 4.3 (4) | 1.5 (1.4) | 1.0 (0.9) | 0.3 | 0.2 |
aConcentrations (error ±0.5 mM) are for oxidized (ox) or reduced (red) Ni-reconstituted ACSCh variants comprising the N-, middle, and C-terminal domains (NMC) or only the C-terminal domain (C) and the indicated cofactor modifications (CO = carbon monoxide treatment, Me = methyl-cobinamide treatment). Values in parenthesis show metal-to-protein ratios calculated under the assumption that four iron ions in the [4Fe4S] cluster are present in both ACSCh variants irrespective of the occupation of the nickel binding sites. The protein concentration was estimated as 1.0±0.2 mM in all samples.
Fig 2Ni XANES spectra of ACSCh.
Spectra of the indicated protein samples in the main panel were in part vertically displaced for comparison (dashes mark zero levels), the inset shows respective K-edge energies (at 50% level of normalized X-ray absorption).
Fig 3EXAFS analysis of ACSCh.
Thin black lines, experimental data (vertically shifted for comparison); thick (colored) lines, simulation curves with parameters in Table 2 (second fits). Vertical dashes highlight the Fourier-transform (FT) main peak position.
EXAFS simulation parameters.
| ACSCh | fit | N [per Ni ion] / R [Å] / 2σ2 x103 [Å2] | Rf | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | no. | Ni-C/N/O | Ni-S | Ni-Ni/Fe/Zn | [%] |
| oxNMC | 1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 8.0 |
| 0.6 | 0.5 | ||||
| 2 | 1.8 / 2.00 / 9 | 1.8 / 2.20 / 5 | 0.8 / 2.91 / 5 | 5.9 | |
| 0.9 / 2.61 / 5 | 0.7 / 2.70 / 5 | ||||
| oxC | 3 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 7.7 |
| 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||
| 4 | 1.6 / 1.98 / 6 | 1.9 / 2.22 / 5 | 0.7 / 2.93 / 5 | 7.2 | |
| 0.7 / 2.63 / 5 | 0.7 / 2.72 / 5 | ||||
| redNMC | 5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 9.1 |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
| 6 | 0.9 / 1.95 / 2 | 1.9 / 2.23 / 5 | 0.7 / 2.96 / 5 | 6.6 | |
| 0.7 / 2.11 / 2 | 0.8 / 2.67 / 5 | 0.7 / 2.73 / 5 | |||
| redNMCCO | 7 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 16.4 |
| 1.1 | 0.5 | ||||
| 8 | 1.1 / 1.90 / 2 | 2.0 / 2.20 / 5 | 0.7 / 2.97 / 5 | 4.6 | |
| 0.6 | 0.6 / 2.75 / 5 | 0.8 / 2.81 / 5 | |||
| 0.6 | |||||
| redCCO | 9 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 12.2 |
| 0.9 | 0.5 | ||||
| 10 | 1.3 / 1.94 / 3 | 1.9 / 2.22 / 5 | 0.6 / 2.94 / 5 | 6.6 | |
| 0.4 | 0.8 / 2.67 / 5 | 0.6 / 2.74 / 5 | |||
| 0.4 | |||||
| redNMCMe | 11 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 11.1 |
| 0.4 | 0.5 | ||||
| 12 | 1.4 / 1.99 / 3 | 1.7 / 2.22 / 5 | 0.6 / 2.97 / 5 | 6.2 | |
| 1.1 / 2.46 / 2 | 0.9 / 2.45 / 5 | 0.5 / 3.49 / 5 | |||
| redCMe | 13 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 10.6 |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||
| 14 | 1.3 / 1.96 / 5 | 1.8 / 2.22 / 5 | 0.5 / 2.98 / 5 | 6.5 | |
| 1.2 / 2.39 / 2 | 0.7 / 2.42 / 5 | 0.5 / 3.54 / 5 | |||
aData correspond to spectra in Fig 3. N = coordination number, R = interatomic distance, 2σ2 = Debye-Waller parameter, Rf = fit error sum (calculated for reduced distances of 1–3 Å).
*Parameters that were fixed (to chemically reasonable values) in the fit procedure
#sulfur coordination numbers were coupled to yield a sum of 2.5 accounting for the mean value over both nickel sites in the [NiNi] sub-complex (Fig 1)
&coordination numbers were coupled to yield the same values for the two shells.
Fig 4Nickel coordination changes from EXAFS.
Mean R-values (weighted by the coordination numbers) and (summed) N-values for NMC and C variants (Table 2) are shown for ox, oxCO, and oxMe samples. x-error bars show full distance ranges for Ni-S and Ni-Ni/Fe shells or estimated EXAFS fit errors for the other shells; y-error bars show the estimated maximal fit error. Assignment of parameters to C(O), O(H), O(H2), and C(H3) ligands is tentative but plausible; see Fig 1 for N/S ligands from amino acid groups. Open triangles, data for crystal structure 1RU3 [15] of oxidized ACSCh (the long Nip-O distance of ~2.74 Å was omitted; the triangle at a distance of ~2.4 Å corresponds to the Ni-ligand bond in structure 1OAO [17]).
Fig 5Structural models for [NiNi] sites in ACSCh.
Overall geometries correspond to crystal structure 1RU3 [15], ligand assignments agree with our XAS analysis. (a) Oxidized A-cluster with two square-planar Ni(II) ions. Ni(I)p presumably is formed in reduced enzyme, leading to protonation of the equatorial OH- to a (neutral) water ligand. (b and c) Reduced enzyme with Nip-bound (equatorial) carbon monoxide or with (apical) methyl and (equatorial) water ligands. Tentative assignment of the proximal site as Ni(II) in the methyl/water-bound state of reduced enzyme may imply reduction of the [4Fe4S] cluster by charge transfer from the [NiNi] site [30]. We note that oxidation state assignments are formal. Further nickel site geometry distortion (i.e. towards more tetrahedral ligand arrangements) in reduced proteins may not be excluded, but is not uniquely implied by our XAS data.