| Literature DB >> 27384529 |
Peer Schrapers1, Stefan Mebs1, Sebastian Goetzl2, Sandra E Hennig2, Holger Dau1, Holger Dobbek2, Michael Haumann1.
Abstract
A cobalamin (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27384529 PMCID: PMC4934906 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Cobalamin crystal structures.
(a) Structure of the Cbl cofactor in CoFeSP enzyme (PDB entry 2H9A, 1.9 Å resolution [12]) showing a base-off configuration (dmb ligand not bound to cobalt in α-position). Ligand X at the ß-position (light green) at cobalt can be absent or can be a water species, a methyl group, or an oxygen from the side chain of RACo-Ser398 in the CoFeSP-RACo complex [14]; red balls show resolved water molecules. (b) Structure of Cbl in base-on configuration [21]; X can be a water, cyanide, or methyl species. Color code: magenta, Co; blue, N; red, O; grey, C; dark green, P; protons were omitted for clarity.
Metal content and cobalt oxidation state in the CoFeSP samples.
| sample | Fe [mM] | Co [mM] | Fe/Co | Co(I) [%] | Co(II) | Co(III) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoFeSP-AqCblox | 3.7 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 0 | 30 | 70 |
| CoFeSP-AqCblred | 2.3 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 30 | 70 | 0 |
| CoFeSP-AqCbl-RACo | 3.9 | 0.6 | 6.5 | 0 | 85 | 15 |
| CoFeSP-MeCblox | 3.3 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
aProtein concentrations for CoFeSP-AqCblox and -MeCblox were 1.0±0.1 mM. Metal concentrations were determined by TXRF (error ±0.1 mM)
bCo(II) contents were determined by EPR (Fig B in S1 File, error ±10%)
cCo(I) contents were estimated from optical absorption spectra (Fig A in S1 File)
dCo(III) contents agree with Co(II)/Co(I) contents and data in Figs A and B in S1 File.
Fig 2EXAFS spectra of cobalamin systems.
Panel (A) shows Fourier-transforms (FTs) of the EXAFS oscillations in panel (B) for indicated solution Cbl or CoFeSP-Cbl samples. Black lines, experimental data; coloured lines, simulations with parameters in Table 2 (fits 2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 21); spectra in (A) and (B) were vertically shifted for comparison.
EXAFS simulation parameters.
| sample | fit | Co-N | Co-C/N/O | Co-C | RF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N / R / 2σ2 | N / R / 2σ2 | N / R / 2σ2 | [%] | ||
| AqCblox | 1 | 4 | 1.8 / 1.96 / 3 | 11 | 8.1 |
| 2 | 4 | 0.9 / 1.92 / 3 | 11 | 8.0 | |
| AqCblred | 3 | 4 | 11 | 17.1 | |
| 4 | 4 | 0.9 / 2.29 / 3 | 11 | 13.6 | |
| 5 | 4 | 1.1 / 2.30 / 3 | 11 | 8.4 | |
| CNCblox | 6 | 4 | 1.5 / 1.97 / 3 | 11 | 16.5 |
| 7 | 4 | 0.8 / 1.85 / 3 | 11 | 12.1 | |
| CNCblred | 8 | 4 | 11 | 19.6 | |
| 9 | 4 | 0.9 / 2.14 / 3 | 11 | 12.3 | |
| 10 | 4 | 1.0 / 2.14 / 3 | 11 | 11.6 | |
| MeCblox | 11 | 4 | 1.3 / 1.93 / 3 | 11 | 10.5 |
| 12 | 4 | 1.2 / 1.95 / 3 | 11 | 7.3 | |
| CoFeSP-AqCblox | 13 | 4 | 0.7 / 2.01 / 3 | 11 | 10.4 |
| 14 | 4 | 0.6 / 2.02 / 3 | 11 | 8.5 | |
| CoFeSP-AqCblred | 15 | 4 | 11 | 19.0 | |
| 16 | 4 | 0.6 / 2.31 / 3 | 11 | 14.4 | |
| 17 | 4 | 0.3 / 1.96 / 3 | 11 | 12.8 | |
| CoFeSP-AqCbl-RACo | 18 | 4 | 0.8 / 2.12 / 3 | 11 | 19.2 |
| 19 | 4 | 0.8 / 2.10 / 3 | 11 | 8.4 | |
| CoFeSP-MeCblox | 20 | 4 | 1.2 / 2.00 / 3 | 11 | 14.5 |
| 21 | 4 | 1.2 / 2.01 / 3 | 11 | 12.5 |
aData refer to EXAFS spectra in Fig 2. N, coordination number per Co ion; R, interatomic distance in Å (i.e. cobalt-ligand bond length); 2σ2, Debye-Waller parameter in x10-3 Å2; RF, fit error sum (calculated for reduced distances of 1–3 Å [27], RF represents the mean root square deviation in % between the experimental Fourier-isolated k-space EXAFS spectrum in the given reduced-distance range of the fit and the fit curve)
*parameters that were fixed at given physically reasonable values in the fits
#2σ2 was coupled to yield the same values for the ~2.9 Å Co-C shell (NCo-C was set to the crystallographic distances in the ~2.9–3.3 Å range, the Debye-Waller factor reflects this distance distribution with more emphasis on the 8 shorter Co-C distances).
A further Co-N-C multiple-scattering shell with the same N and 2σ2 values as for the Co-C shell was included in the fits (apparent N-C distances given in parenthesis). The 2σ2 values for the Co-N and Co-C/N/O shells were chosen to provide best fit results. Two lines for a given coordination shell mean that both distances were included in the respective fit. We note that splitting of the axial ligation shells in the fit procedure is tentative due to the ~0.1 Å distance discrimination limit of our k = 13 Å-1 EXAFS data [58]. We note that the small N-values of the second Co-C/N/O shell with relatively long distances for CoFeSP-MeCbl (fit 19) and CoFeSP-RACo (fit 21) may not be significant and suggest dominance of 5-coordinated cobalt sites (see Fig F in S1 File).
Fig 3Cobalt XANES spectra.
(A) Indicated Cbl solution samples, (B) CoFeSP-Cbl samples. Dotted lines mark edge half-height. Spectra of CoIII2O3 (solid black line) and CoIIO (dashed black line) are shown for comparison in (A) and (B). Inset: Isolated pre-edge (core-to-valence, ctv) absorption features after subtraction of a smooth edge rise background (not shown) from the XANES spectra. For XANES spectra of further cobalt reference compounds see Fig C in S1 File.
Fig 4Cobalt K-edge energies.
Shown are K-edge energies (at 50% level) of XANES spectra in Fig 3 of Cbl and CoFeSP-Cbl samples (colored symbols) and of cobalt reference compounds (Fig C in S1 File) containing Co(I), Co(II), or Co(III) (open squares). Black line, linear regression to the reference data (EK-edge = 7712.77 eV + 2.76 eV * x, x = cobalt oxidation state); data points for solution Cbl and CoFeSP-Cbl were placed on the fit curve according to their K-edge energies. (For K-edge energies from XANES simulations see Figs D and E in S1 File.)
Fig 5Comparison of DFT calculated and experimental ctv features.
Lines, spectra from DFT; dots, experimental data (Fig 3); spectra were vertically shifted for comparison; note the doubled y-scale in (B). Calculated spectra represent the indicated model structures; solid lines and coloured annotations denote calculated spectra for the indicated structures, which show superior agreement with the experimental data (broken lines show calculation results less in agreement with the experimental data).
Cobalt-ligand bond lengths from crystallography, EXAFS, and DFT.
| species | bond length [Å] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | (Lα)Cox(Lß) | Co-Ncorrinmean | Co-Lα | Co-Lß | ||||||
| crystal | EXAFS | DFT | crystal | EXAFS | DFT | crystal | EXAFS | DFT | ||
| AqCblox | (dmb)CoIII(OH2) | 1.89 | 1.88 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 1.97 | 2.11 |
| AqCblred | (dmb)CoII(OH2) | - | 1.89 | 1.92 | - | 2.30 | 2.36 | - | 2.47 | 2.96 |
| (dmb)CoII | - | 1.89 | 1.92 | - | 2.30 | 2.30 | - | - | - | |
| CNCblox | (dmb)CoII(CN) | 1.91 | 1.89 | 1.92 | 2.04 | 2.05 | 2.15 | 1.87 | 1.85 | 1.88 |
| CNCblred | CoII(CN) | - | 1.88 | 1.92 | - | - | 2.14 | 2.10 | ||
| (dmb)CoII | - | 1.88 | 1.92 | - | 2.54 | 2.30 | - | - | - | |
| MeCblox | (dmb)CoIII(CH3) | 1.90 | 1.89 | 1.92 | 2.16 | 2.21 | 2.36 | 1.99 | 1.95 | 1.97 |
| CoFeSP-AqCblox | (OH2)CoIII(OH2) | - | 1.88 | 1.92 | - | 2.02 | 1.99 | - | 2.02 | 1.99 |
| CoIII(OH2) | - | 1.88 | 1.91 | - | - | - | - | 2.02 | 1.97 | |
| CoFeSP-AqCblred | (OH2)CoII(OH2) | - | 1.96 | 1.92 | - | 2.33 | 2.53 | - | 2.33 | 2.54 |
| CoII(OH2) | 1.90 | 1.86 | 1.91 | - | - | - | 2.55 | 2.33 | - | |
| CoFeSP-AqCbl-RACo | CoII(OSer) | 1.90 | 1.88 | 1.92 | - | - | - | 2.40 | 2.10 | 2.08 |
| CoFeSP-MeCblox | (OH2)CoIII(CH3) | - | 1.87 | 1.91 | - | 2.50 | 2.46 | - | 2.00 | 1.96 |
| CoIII(CH3) | 1.90 | 1.87 | 1.91 | - | - | - | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.96 | |
Crystal data for Cbl and CoFeSP-Cbl species were derived from refs.
a[56]
b[55]
c[54]
d[12, 19]
e[14]
f[18]
DFT data refer to geometry-optimized model structures with the indicated cobalt oxidation states and axial ligations; bond lengths from EXAFS (Table 2) were placed in the table to match the other data best and facilitate species comparison.
Fig 6Cobalt coordination models.
Shown structures represent most prominent species identified in the solution Cbl (top) and CoFeSP-Cbl (bottom) samples. The dmb ligand binds in α-position at cobalt; a water ligand in ß-position in Co(III)-containing CoFeSP-AqCbl cannot be fully excluded; RACo-Ser398 binds at Co(II) in the CoFeSP-RACo complex.
Core-to-valence electronic transition characters.
| core-to-valence transition characters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| electric contribution [%] | metal/ligand contribution [%] | |||||
| cobalt site | dipole | quadrupole | Co | corrin | Lα | Lß |
| (dmb)CoIII(OH2) | 85.0 | 11.3 | 58.3 | 25.8 | 4.2 | 11.7 |
| (OH2)CoIII(OH2) | 61.1 | 38.1 | 46.5 | 47.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| CoIII(OH2) | 80.8 | 16.8 | 53.2 | 43.4 | - | 3.4 |
| (dmb)CoII(OH2) | 77.0 | 20.4 | 24.3 | 55.5 | 8.1 | 12.1 |
| CoII(OH2) | 74.8 | 23.5 | 26.9 | 58.4 | - | 14.7 |
| (dmb)CoIII(CH3) | 96.5 | 0.3 | 28.0 | 24.2 | 15.5 | 32.3 |
| CoIII(CH3) | 98.0 | 1.8 | 37.3 | 40.7 | - | 22.0 |
| (dmb)CoIII(CN) | 88.7 | 9.8 | 35.5 | 49.4 | 7.2 | 7.9 |
| CoII(CN) | 93.7 | 5.6 | 40.3 | 53.8 | - | 5.9 |
| CoII(OSer) | 93.1 | 6.1 | 41.9 | 54.4 | - | 3.7 |
Data represents the summed relative contributions to the respective DFT-calculated stick spectra underlying the ctv spectra in Fig 5.
adifference to 100% = magnetic pole contribution.
bMetal/ligand contributions (Lα, Lß = axial cobalt ligands) denote respective characters of ctv target molecular orbitals.
Fig 7Molecular orbitals in Cbl model structures from DFT.
LUMO, lowest unoccupied MO corresponding to the lowest energy core-to-valence electronic transition in the pre-edge absorption X-ray spectral region; ctvmax, MO corresponding to the highest-intensity ctv transition of the pre-edge absorption. Cobalt oxidation state and axial ligation are indicated.
HOMO and LUMO energies and natural population analysis charges from DFT.
| cobalt site | energy [eV] | ΔE [eV] | NPA charge [e] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOMO | LUMO | Co | corrin | L α | Lß | ||
| (dmb)CoIII(OH2) | -11.4 | -8.3 | 3.1 | 0.39 | 0.90 | 0.49 | 0.23 |
| (OH2)CoIII(OH2) | -11.8 | -8.8 | 3.0 | 0.45 | 0.95 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| CoIII(OH2) | -12.3 | -10.2 | 2.1 | 0.56 | 1.15 | - | 0.28 |
| (dmb)CoII(OH2) | -7.9 (-7.9) | -4.5 (-4.5) | 3.4 (3.4) | 0.58 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| CoII(OH2) | -8.4 (-8.4) | -4.8 (-4.8) | 3.6 (3.6) | 0.61 | 0.30 | - | 0.08 |
| (dmb)CoIII(CH3) | -7.9 | -4.6 | 3.3 | 0.21 | 0.59 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| CoIII(CH3) | -8.7 | -5.0 | 3.7 | 0.30 | 0.65 | - | 0.05 |
| (dmb)CoIII(CN) | -8.2 | -4.9 | 3.3 | 0.04 | 0.85 | 0.29 | -0.18 |
| CoII(CN) | -4.2 (-5.1) | -1.8 (-1.8) | 2.4 (3.3) | 0.28 | 0.27 | - | -0.55 |
| CoII(OSer) | -3.8 (-3.7) | -1.6 (-1.6) | 2.2 (2.1) | 0.50 | 0.17 | - | -0.67 |
aValues correspond to model structures with the indicated cobalt oxidation states and axial ligations in low-spin species
ΔE = E(LUMO)–E(HOMO); L α, Lß = axial cobalt ligands
benergies of “up" and “down” (in parenthesis) -spin MOs are given for the Co(II) species (and have the same energy in the Co(I) and Co(III) species).