Literature DB >> 3217374

Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors.

D N Rutledge1, W H Hartmann, P O Kinman, A C Winfield.   

Abstract

Of an estimated pool of 1,700 potential participants, only 382 (22%) eligible women participated in a low-cost breast cancer screening program offered to university and medical center employees. Because most women were still available and data were needed to understand why the opportunity to participate was refused by so many, a survey was done to determine factors related to mammography behavior. Three distinct groups of women were identified according to health beliefs, mammography behaviors, and modifying factors. Women who participated in the mammogram program were predominantly well-educated working women who were aware of mammography and its relationship to the breast cancer trajectory; they were affected by cost and convenience issues. One group of women did not participate in the program offered because they had had a recent mammogram; these women were at high risk for breast cancer and perceived mammography to be beneficial. The women who did not participate for other reasons were in nonprofessional jobs, had lower levels of education, and tended not to participate in the health care system as readily as women in the other groups; they perceived themselves less susceptible to breast cancer, valued mammography less, and knew less about breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3217374     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(88)90040-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  18 in total

1.  Screening behaviors among relatives of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  V G Vogel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The effects of insurance coverage and ethnicity on mammography utilization in a postmenopausal population.

Authors:  R A Bush; R D Langer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-04

3.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Cultural considerations for South Asian women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Manveen Bedi; Gerald M Devins
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: the impact on self-reported mammography use.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; B K Rimer; M Daly; C Sands; C Lerman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.

Authors:  S F Hurley; R M Huggins; D J Jolley; D Reading
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; M L Bondy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?

Authors:  C S Skinner; V J Strecher; H Hospers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: relative mortality and reasons for nonattendance.

Authors:  E Lidbrink; J Frisell; Y Brandberg; I Rosendahl; L E Rutqvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.