| Literature DB >> 28134751 |
Rodney A Moxley1, David H Francis2, Mizuho Tamura3, David B Marx4, Kristina Santiago-Mateo5, Mojun Zhao6.
Abstract
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is the most common cause of hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome in human patients, with brain damage and dysfunction the main cause of acute death. We evaluated the efficacy of urtoxazumab (TMA-15, Teijin Pharma Limited), a humanized monoclonal antibody against Shiga toxin (Stx) 2 for the prevention of brain damage, dysfunction, and death in a piglet EHEC infection model. Forty-five neonatal gnotobiotic piglets were inoculated orally with 3 × 10⁸ colony-forming units of EHEC O157:H7 strain EDL933 (Stx1⁺, Stx2⁺) when 22-24 h old. At 24 h post-inoculation, piglets were intraperitoneally administered placebo or TMA-15 (0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg body weight). Compared to placebo (n = 10), TMA-15 (n = 35) yielded a significantly greater probability of survival, length of survival, and weight gain (p <0.05). The efficacy of TMA-15 against brain lesions and death was 62.9% (p = 0.0004) and 71.4% (p = 0.0004), respectively. These results suggest that TMA-15 may potentially prevent or reduce vascular necrosis and infarction of the brain attributable to Stx2 in human patients acutely infected with EHEC. However, we do not infer that TMA-15 treatment will completely protect human patients infected with EHEC O157:H7 strains that produce both Stx1 and Stx2.Entities:
Keywords: Shiga toxin; enterohemorrhagic E. coli; gnotobiotic piglets; monoclonal antibody
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28134751 PMCID: PMC5331429 DOI: 10.3390/toxins9020049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Proportion of piglets by treatment group that survived for 192 h after inoculation with enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157:H7 *.
| Treatment | Litter | Total (%) ** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Placebo | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 1/10 (10.0) a |
| TMA-15, 0.3 mg/kg † | 0/2 | NT ‡ | 2/3 | 4/4 | 3/3 | 9/12 (75.0) b |
| TMA-15, 1.0 mg/kg | 0/1 | NT | 3/4 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 9/11 (81.8) b |
| TMA-15, 3.0 mg/kg | 0/2 | 2/2 | 1/3 | 3/3 | 2/2 | 8/12 (66.7) b |
| Pooled TMA-15 data | 0/5 | 2/2 | 6/10 | 10/10 | 8/8 | 25/35 (71.4) b |
* Number survived/number inoculated. ** Total proportion for all 5 litters combined and expressed as a percentage. † Dosage of TMA-15 in mg/kg body weight, administered intraperitoneally 24 h post-inoculation. ‡ NT, not tested since the litter contained only 4 piglets, and the a priori study design was to include a minimum of 2 piglets per treatment group per litter. a,b Unlike superscripts denote significantly different proportions (p < 0.05) based on Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test analyses (FREQ Procedure, SAS) which gave similar results.
Figure 1Probability of survival over time in piglets treated with TMA-15 (dashed red line; n = 35) or placebo (solid blue line; n = 10) 24 h post-challenge inoculation with enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157:H7. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method (LIFETEST procedure in SAS). + Censored indicates that censored data (piglets surviving to the maximal observation time of 192 h) were used in the analysis.
Figure 2Probability of survival over time in piglets treated with TMA-15 at different dosages [0.3 mg/kg (solid blue line; n = 12), 1.0 mg/kg (dashed red line; n = 11), and 3.0 mg/kg (dashed green line; n = 12)] or with placebo (solid blue line; n = 10) 24 h post-challenge inoculation with EHEC O157:H7. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method (LIFETEST procedure in SAS). + Censored indicates that censored data (piglets surviving to the maximal observation time of 192 h) were used in the analysis.
Mean weight change and weight change per h in piglets after inoculation with EHEC O157:H7.
| Treatment | % Weight Change * | % Weight Change/h * | Difference in % Weight Change and % Weight Change/h (in Parentheses) from External Non-Toxin Control † |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo ( | 5.8 ± 3.5 a | 0.04 ± 0.02 a | −22.3 ± 1.4 (−0.11 ± 0.1) |
| TMA-15, 0.3 mg/kg ( | 24.8 ± 4.9 b | 0.13 ± 0.03 b | −3.3 ± 1.5 (−0.02 ± 0.1) |
| TMA-15, 1.0 mg/kg ( | 30.4 ± 5.0 b | 0.15 ± 0.03 b | 2.3 ± 1.6 (0.00 ± 0.1) |
| TMA-15, 3.0 mg/kg ( | 25.7 ± 6.5 b | 0.13 ± 0.04 b | −2.4 ± 1.7 (−0.02 ± 0.1) |
| Pooled TMA-15 data ( | 26.9 ± 3.1 b | 0.14 ± 0.02 b | 1.2 ± 1.2 (−0.01 ± 0.72) |
| External non-toxin control ( | 28.1 ± 1.31 b | 0.15 ± 0.01 b | NA |
* Mean ± standard error of mean. % weight change represents the difference in body weight occurring between the times of administration of treatment (TMA-15 or placebo) and euthanasia or necropsy, if death had already occurred, expressed as a percentage. % weight change per h represents weight change as previously defined divided by the number of h represented by the time differential, expressed as a percentage. Means for placebo and pooled TMA-15 groups were compared using Student’s t test (SAS TTEST). Additionally, means for placebo and the 3 dosage levels of TMA-15 were compared using the GLM (General Linear Model) procedure, LS (Least Squares) Means in SAS. Since this study did not include non-inoculated piglets, historical data from age-matched gnotobiotic piglet controls from another study [27] was used to estimate the extent to which TMA-15 treatment normalized the weight change. These controls (n = 2) were weighed at the same ages as in the present study (at 1 and 9 days of age, 192 h apart) prior to inoculation and were raised under comparable conditions (type of milk replacer, frequency, amount, isolator units, etc.). The % weight change and % weight change per h for the external controls was 28.1 ± 1.31 and 0.15 ± 0.01, respectively. The differences between the means were determined by simple subtraction, whereas that for SEMs was calculated by the following formula: SEM difference = SQRT ([SD group 1/n1] + [SD group 2/n2]), where SQRT = square root, SD = standard deviation, and n = number of piglets in group. a,b Unlike superscripts denote significantly different means (p < 0.05). NA = not applicable.
Contingency table (2 × 2) comparing numbers of piglets with brain lesions and neurological signs.
| Outcome | Brain Lesions | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurological Signs | Absence (0) or Presence (1) | 0 | 1 | |
| 0 | 21 | 4 | 25 | |
| 1 | 1 | 19 * | 20 | |
| Total | 22 | 23 | 45 | |
* The proportion of piglets manifesting neurological signs that had detectable brain lesions [19/20 (95%)] was significantly greater than the proportion manifesting neurological signs that lacked detectable brain lesions (1/20 (5%)) (p <0.0001), as determined by Fisher’s exact test (FREQ Procedure, SAS).
Contingency table (2 × 2) comparing numbers of piglets with brain lesions and death.
| Outcome | Brain Lesions | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | Absence (0) or Presence (1) | 0 | 1 | |
| 0 | 22 | 5 | 27 | |
| 1 | 0 | 18 * | 18 | |
| Total | 22 | 23 | 45 | |
* The proportion of piglets that died that had detectable brain lesions (18/18 (100%)) was significantly greater than the proportion that died that lacked detectable brain lesions (0/18 (0%)) (p <0.0001), as determined by Fisher’s exact test (FREQ Procedure, SAS).
Figure 3Comparison of brain lesion scores in piglets that were moribund and euthanatized or died (all counted as deaths) during the 192-h post-inoculation period (red bars; n = 18) with scores of those that survived for 192 h post-inoculation (blue bars; n = 27). Bars show means and standard errors of brain lesion scores (Y axis) as determined by a modification of the brain ischemia scoring scheme of Björkman et al. [29]. Coronal section areas of brain examined (X axis) were the same as those as described by Francis et al. [19] with reference points in parentheses: 1 = medulla oblongata (olivary nucleus); 2 = cerebellum (cerebellar peduncles); 3 = midbrain (corpora quadrigemina); 4 = cerebrum and thalamus (interthalamic adhesion); 5 = cerebrum (genu of corpus callosum); total = sum of scores of all five areas. The mean total lesion score for piglets that survived (2.7 ± 1.6) was significantly lower (p <0.001) than the mean score for those that died (29.2 ± 2.7), as determined by Student’s t test (TTEST, SAS).
Mean total brain lesion scores in piglets after inoculation with EHEC O157:H7.
| Treatment | Total Brain Lesion Score * |
|---|---|
| Placebo ( | 27.5 ± 3.6a |
| TMA-15, 0.3 mg/kg ( | 11.8 ± 5.2b |
| TMA-15, 1.0 mg/kg ( | 4.7 ± 2.8b |
| TMA-15, 3.0 mg/kg ( | 10.8 ± 4.8b |
| Pooled TMA-15 groups ( | 9.3 ± 2.6b |
* Mean ± standard error of mean. % weight change represents the difference in body weight occurring between the times of administration of treatment (TMA-15 or placebo) and euthanasia or necropsy, if death had already occurred, expressed as a percentage. % weight change per h represents weight change as previously defined divided by the number of h represented by the time differential, expressed as a percentage. Means for placebo and pooled TMA-15 groups were compared using Student’s t test (SAS TTEST). Additionally, means for placebo and the 3 dosage levels of TMA-15 were compared using the GLM (General Linear Model) procedure, LS (Least Squares) Means in SAS. a,b Unlike superscripts denote significantly different means (p < 0.05).
Comparison of P values with and without inclusion of Litter 5 data *.
| Response Variable | Comparison | Test | Litters 1–5 ( | Litters 1–4 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival | Across P and 3 dosages of T | Chi-Square | 0.0327 | 0.1362 |
| Survival | P versus pooled T | Chi-Square | 0.0039 | 0.0210 |
| Survival curve (survival over time) | P versus pooled T | Kaplan-Meier | 0.0165 | 0.0658 |
| Weight change | P versus pooled T | 0.0014 | 0.0038 | |
| Weight change/h | P versus pooled T | 0.0073 | 0.0132 | |
| Brain lesions and neurological signs | Relationship | Fisher’s exact test | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Brain lesions and death | Relationship | Fisher’s exact test | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Total brain lesion score | S versus D | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| Total brain lesion score | P versus T | 0.0010 | 0.0440 | |
| % Efficacy against death † | P versus T | 1-Relative Risk | <0.0004 | <0.001 |
| % Efficacy against brain lesions ‡ | P versus T | 1-Relative Risk | <0.0004 | <0.0086 |
* p = placebo-treated; T = TMA-15-treated; pooled T = data from 3 dosage groups pooled; S = survived; D = died (includes moribund piglets that were euthanatized); t test = Student’s t test. † The % efficacy of TMA-15 against death for n = 45 was 71.4%, compared to 66.7% for n = 35. ‡ The % efficacy of TMA-15 against brain lesions for n = 45 was 62.9%, compared to 51.9% for n = 35.
Comparison of studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-Stx2 monoclonal therapy to prevent systemic complications following intestinal infection with EHEC O157:H7 in gnotobiotic piglets.
| Parameter | Present Study | Reference [ | Reference [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monoclonal antibody type | Humanized | Human | Human |
| Monoclonal antibody (isotype) | TMA-15 (IgG1κ) | 3E9, 5H8, 2F10, 5C12 (IgG1κ) | 5C12 (IgG1κ) |
| Monoclonal antibody Stx subunit specificity | B | A, B, A, A * | A |
| Monoclonal antibody dosage (h post-inoculation) | 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg (24) | 3.0 mg (6 or 12) | 1.5 or 3.0 mg/kg (24) |
| 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.75, 3.0 or 6.0 mg/kg (48) | |||
| EHEC inoculum strain (Stx type) | EDL933 (Stx1+, Stx2+) | 86-24 (Stx2+) | 86–24 (Stx2+) |
| EHEC inoculum level | ~3 × 109 CFU † | ~1 × 101° CFU | ~1 × 1010 CFU |
| Age of pig in hours at time of EHEC inoculation | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Maximum number of days of observation after inoculation | 8 | 10 | 14 |
| Fluid therapy used to control dehydration after inoculation | No | No | Yes |
| Response variables monitored | Diarrhea, anorexia, lethargy, anorexia, dehydration, weight change, weight change per h, CNS signs, moribund state, survival, brain lesions (5 levels), brain lesion score (5 levels) | Diarrhea, dehydration, CNS signs, brain lesions (2 levels: cerebral cortex and cerebellum), survival, serum human IgG concentration | Diarrhea, anorexia, depression, dehydration, weight loss, brain lesions (2 levels: cerebral cortex and cerebellum), survival, serum human IgG1(κ) concentration |
| Response variables statistically analyzed by hypothesis testing | Weight change, weight change per h, CNS signs, survival, brain lesions (5 levels), brain lesion score (5 levels) | Survival | Not indicated |
* Order of listing of Shiga toxin subunit specificities refers to respective order of monoclonal antibodies listed in row above. † CFU, colony-forming units.
Number of piglets used in the study.
| Litter | Placebo | TMA-15 Dosage (mg/kg Body Weight) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 1.0 | 3.0 | |||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 |
| 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| Total | 10 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 45 |
Neuropathological scoring scheme.
| Neuropathological Score | Percentage of Area Affected | Morphological Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | No injury |
| 1 | <20 | Vascular necrosis with thrombosis and hemorrhage |
| 2 | 20–50 | |
| 3 | >50 | |
| 4 | <20 | Neuronal necrosis |
| 5 | 20–50 | |
| 6 | >50 | |
| 7 | <20 | Laminar necrosis |
| 8 | 20–50 | |
| 9 | >50 | |
| 10 | <20 | Confluent necrosis |
| 11 | 20–50 | |
| 12 | >50 |