Literature DB >> 12934944

Exogenous porcine viruses.

P S Paul1, P Halbur, B Janke, H Joo, P Nawagitgul, J Singh, S Sorden.   

Abstract

Porcine organs, cells and tissues provide a viable source of transplants in humans, though there is some concern of public health risk from adaptation of swine infectious agents in humans. Limited information is available on the public health risk of many exogenous swine viruses, and reliable and rapid diagnostic tests are available for only a few of these. The ability of several porcine viruses to cause transplacental fetal infection (parvoviruses, circoviruses, and arteriviruses), emergence or recognition of several new porcine viruses during the last two decades (porcine circovirus, arterivirus, paramyxoviruses, herpesviruses, and porcine respiratory coronavirus) and the immunosuppressed state of the transplant recipients increases the xenozoonoses risk of humans to porcine viruses through transplantation. Much of this risk can be eliminated with vigilance and sustained monitoring along with a better understanding of pathogenesis and development of better diagnostic tests. In this review we present information on selected exogenous viruses, highlighting their characteristics, pathogenesis of viral infections in swine, methods for their detection, and the potential xenozoonoses risk they present. Emphasis has been given in this review to swine influenza virus, paramyxovirus (Nipah virus, Menagle virus, LaPiedad paramyxovirus, porcine paramyxovirus), arterivirus (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus) and circovirus as either they represent new swine viruses or present the greatest risk. We have also presented information on porcine parvovirus, Japanese encephalitis virus, encephalomyocarditis virus, herpesviruses (pseudorabies virus, porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus, porcine cytomegalovirus), coronaviruses (TGEV, PRCV, HEV, PEDV) and adenovirus. The potential of swine viruses to infect humans needs to be assessed in vitro and in vivo and rapid and more reliable diagnostic methods need to be developed to assure safe supply of porcine tissues and cells for xenotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12934944     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55541-1_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0070-217X            Impact factor:   4.291


  5 in total

1.  Biologic scaffolds composed of central nervous system extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Peter M Crapo; Christopher J Medberry; Janet E Reing; Stephen Tottey; Yolandi van der Merwe; Kristen E Jones; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Pathogenesis of coxsackievirus-B5 acquired from intra-renal porcine islet cell xenografts in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Suzanne E Myers; Rebecca LaRue; Daniel P Shaw; Brenda C Love; Kariuki Njenga M; Moses K Njenga
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 3.  The porcine lung as a potential model for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Christopher S Rogers; William M Abraham; Kim A Brogden; John F Engelhardt; John T Fisher; Paul B McCray; Geoffrey McLennan; David K Meyerholz; Eman Namati; Lynda S Ostedgaard; Randall S Prather; Juan R Sabater; David Anthony Stoltz; Joseph Zabner; Michael J Welsh
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 4.  Lessons learned from the cystic fibrosis pig.

Authors:  David K Meyerholz
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Efficacy of Urtoxazumab (TMA-15 Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Specific for Shiga Toxin 2) Against Post-Diarrheal Neurological Sequelae Caused by Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infection in the Neonatal Gnotobiotic Piglet Model.

Authors:  Rodney A Moxley; David H Francis; Mizuho Tamura; David B Marx; Kristina Santiago-Mateo; Mojun Zhao
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.