Literature DB >> 2812841

Somatosensory event-related potentials to painful and non-painful stimuli: effects of attention.

Wolfgang Miltner1, Ray Johnson, Christoph Braun, Wolfgang Larbig.   

Abstract

In order to determine the effects of attention and distraction on painful and non-painful stimuli, the amplitude changes of 3 components (N150, P200, P300) of the somatosensory event-related potential (SERP) elicited by painful and non-painful electrical stimuli were investigated. Painful and non-painful stimuli were determined using a visual analog scale. SERPs were recorded from 16 healthy volunteers at 5 midline and 4 left and 4 right hemispheric sites. The differences between the amplitudes of attended and ignored stimuli were quantified with a baseline-to-peak measure. ANOVA results revealed no significant attention or stimulus intensity effects for N150 but highly significant differences in P200 and P300 amplitudes between attended and ignored stimuli. In addition, P200 and P300 amplitudes were larger for strong stimuli than for weak stimuli, with no significant differences between non-painful and painful stimuli. These findings are consistent with the existence of a relative, rather than an absolute, relationship between SERP component amplitudes and subjective pain reports. Furthermore, the data give evidence that attentional manipulations represent a powerful method to decrease the perception of pain and that, when used with subjective and behavioral measures, the SERP represents a valuable asset in the multidimensional approach to pain measurement and assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2812841     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90217-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  22 in total

1.  Effect of propofol and remifentanil on a somatosensory evoked potential indicator of pain perception intensity in volunteers.

Authors:  Ana Castro; Pedro Amorim; Catarina S Nunes; Fernando Gomes de Almeida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Authors:  Marcel Franz; Moritz M Nickel; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Human primary somatosensory cortex is differentially involved in vibrotaction and nociception.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Gan Huang; Yves Vandermeeren; Samar Marie Hatem; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Pain-related and negative semantic priming enhances perceived pain intensity.

Authors:  Maria Richter; Christoph Schroeter; Theresa Puensch; Thomas Straube; Holger Hecht; Alexander Ritter; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Spatial attention to thermal pain stimuli in subjects with visual spatial hemi-neglect: extinction, mislocalization and misidentification of stimulus modality.

Authors:  C C Liu; D S Veldhuijzen; S Ohara; J Winberry; J D Greenspan; F A Lenz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Sex dimorphism in a mediatory role of the posterior midcingulate cortex in the association between anxiety and pain sensitivity.

Authors:  Lee-Bareket Kisler; Yelena Granovsky; Alon Sinai; Elliot Sprecher; Simone Shamay-Tsoory; Irit Weissman-Fogel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sex differences in brain activation to anticipated and experienced pain in the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Thomas Straube; Stephanie Schmidt; Thomas Weiss; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A painful cutaneous laser stimulus evokes responses from single neurons in the human thalamic principal somatic sensory nucleus ventral caudal (Vc).

Authors:  K Kobayashi; J Winberry; C C Liu; R D Treede; F A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Different sensitivity of pain-related chemosensory potentials evoked by stimulation with CO2, tooth pulp event-related potentials, and acoustic event-related potentials to the tranquilizer diazepam.

Authors:  N Thürauf; W Ditterich; G Kobal
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Anodal Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) Selectively Inhibits the Synaptic Efficacy of Nociceptive Transmission at Spinal Cord Level.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Aleksandar Jankovski; André Mouraux
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.