Literature DB >> 28446584

Human primary somatosensory cortex is differentially involved in vibrotaction and nociception.

Cédric Lenoir1, Gan Huang1, Yves Vandermeeren1,2,3, Samar Marie Hatem1,4, André Mouraux5.   

Abstract

The role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established. In contrast, its involvement in nociception is still debated. Here we test whether S1 is similarly involved in the processing of nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory input in humans by comparing the aftereffects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of S1 on the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by nonnociceptive and nociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral hands. Cathodal HD-tDCS significantly affected the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory stimuli delivered to the contralateral hand: both early-latency ERPs from within S1 (N20 wave elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of median nerve) and late-latency ERPs elicited outside S1 (N120 wave elicited by short-lasting mechanical vibrations delivered to index fingertip, thought to originate from bilateral operculo-insular and cingulate cortices). These results support the notion that S1 constitutes an obligatory relay for the cortical processing of nonnociceptive tactile input originating from the contralateral hemibody. Contrasting with this asymmetric effect of HD-tDCS on the responses to nonnociceptive somatosensory input, HD-tDCS over the sensorimotor cortex led to a bilateral and symmetric reduction of the magnitude of the N240 wave of nociceptive laser-evoked potentials elicited by stimulation of the hand dorsum. Taken together, our results demonstrate in humans a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Whereas the role of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) in vibrotaction is well established, its involvement in nociception remains strongly debated. By assessing, in healthy volunteers, the effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over S1, we demonstrate a differential involvement of S1 in vibrotaction and nociception.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evoked potentials; nociception; primary somatosensory cortex; touch; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446584      PMCID: PMC5498736          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00615.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  92 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception.

Authors:  Andreas Rogalewski; Caterina Breitenstein; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary sensory cortex on somatosensory perception.

Authors:  Lisa Grundmann; Roman Rolke; Michael A Nitsche; Goran Pavlakovic; Svenja Happe; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Walter Paulus; Cornelius G Bachmann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Scalp topography and dipolar source modelling of potentials evoked by CO2 laser stimulation of the hand.

Authors:  M Valeriani; L Rambaud; F Mauguière
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07

4.  Modulatory effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on laser-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gabor Csifcsak; Andrea Antal; Ferdinand Hillers; Maik Levold; Cornelius G Bachmann; Svenja Happe; Michael A Nitsche; Jens Ellrich; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Exploring the specific time course of interhemispheric inhibition between the human primary sensory cortices.

Authors:  Sonia M Brodie; Anica Villamayor; Michael R Borich; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; R Peyron; P Mertens; M C Gregoire; F Lavenne; D Le Bars; P Convers; F Mauguière; M Sindou; B Laurent
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix".

Authors:  André Mouraux; Ana Diukova; Michael C Lee; Richard G Wise; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  CO2 laser activation of nociceptive and non-nociceptive thermal afferents from hairy and glabrous skin.

Authors:  A D Towell; A M Purves; S G Boyd
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity.

Authors:  T Allison; G McCarthy; C C Wood; P D Williamson; D D Spencer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measuring the sensitivity of tactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind participants using the adaptive psi method.

Authors:  Camille Vanderclausen; Lieve Filbrich; Anne De Volder; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by high-speed cooling of the skin: A robust and non-painful method to assess the spinothalamic system in humans.

Authors:  Roxane De Keyser; Emanuel N van den Broeke; Arthur Courtin; André Dufour; André Mouraux
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Somatosensory Gating Is Modulated by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Casandra I Montoro; Christine Winterholler; Juan L Terrasa; Pedro Montoya
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Laser stimulation of the skin for quantitative study of decision-making and motivation.

Authors:  Julia Pai; Takaya Ogasawara; Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Kei Ogasawara; Robert W Gereau; Ilya E Monosov
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2022-09-19

5.  The Effect of Dual-Hemisphere Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Parietal Operculum on Tactile Orientation Discrimination.

Authors:  Shuhei Fujimoto; Satoshi Tanaka; Ilkka Laakso; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Noriko Kon; Takeo Nakayama; Kunitsugu Kondo; Ryo Kitada
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.