Literature DB >> 25355557

Effect of propofol and remifentanil on a somatosensory evoked potential indicator of pain perception intensity in volunteers.

Ana Castro1,2, Pedro Amorim3, Catarina S Nunes3,4, Fernando Gomes de Almeida5,3.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) have been linked to noxious activation and stimulus intensity. In this exploratory study we investigated the impact of anaesthetic drugs on SEPs and pain ratings, to assess their applicability as an objective measure of the nociception/anti-nociception balance. Following institutional approval and written informed consent, 10 healthy adult volunteers were enrolled (29.5 ± 9.1 years, 63.0 ± 8.9 kg and 171.4 ± 7.2). Median nerve electrical stimulation was adjusted according to volunteers' sensitive, motor and painful thresholds (PT). Baseline SEPs were registered, and remifentanil and propofol administered using a stair scheme TCI. For each drug combination a 1.3×PT stimulus was administered, and volunteers evaluated pain intensity in a numerical rating scale (0-10). SEPs' amplitudes and latencies were normalized by the baseline values, reducing volunteers' intervariability. Stimulation currents varied between 6-52 mA (1.3×PT) and pain ratings between 0 and 9. Cortical SEPs latencies were decreased for higher stimulus intensities (P < 0.01), accompanied by increased pain ratings (P < 0.01). An individually adjusted/normalized ratio based on cortical SEPs amplitude and interpeak latency is proposed([Formula: see text]): [Formula: see text] and NSR were significantly correlated in three out of nine subjects, and [Formula: see text] and remifentanil Ce were significantly correlated in two (low number of evaluation points). [Formula: see text] was shown to decrease with increasing doses of propofol and remifentanil (P < 0.05). The proposed metric was depressed by anaesthetics and reflected pain evaluations. Further research is necessary to increase the number of volunteers and drugs' combination, to assess its applicability during surgically adequate anesthetic leves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monitoring; Nociception; Pain; Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs); TIVA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25355557     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-014-9632-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  23 in total

1.  Somatosensory and auditory evoked responses recorded simultaneously: differential effects of nitrous oxide and isoflurane.

Authors:  C Thornton; P Creagh-Barry; C Jordan; N P Luff; C J Doré; M Henley; D E Newton
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Subhypnotic doses of thiopentone and propofol cause analgesia to experimentally induced acute pain.

Authors:  E Anker-Møller; N Spangsberg; L Arendt-Nielsen; P Schultz; M S Kristensen; P Bjerring
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Combined use of Bispectral Index and A-Line Autoregressive Index to assess anti-nociceptive component of balanced anaesthesia during lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  V Bonhomme; V Llabres; P-Y Dewandre; J F Brichant; P Hans
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Neurophysiology and intraoperative nociception: new potentials?

Authors:  George A Mashour
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Comparison of touch- and laser heat-evoked cortical field potentials in conscious rats.

Authors:  F Z Shaw; R F Chen; H W Tsao; C T Yen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-04-10       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Remifentanil reduces auditory and somatosensory evoked responses during isoflurane anaesthesia in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors:  I Crabb; C Thornton; K M Konieczko; A Chan; R Aquilina; N Frazer; C J Doré; D E Newton
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application.

Authors:  C F Minto; T W Schnider; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study.

Authors:  K Bornhövd; M Quante; V Glauche; B Bromm; C Weiller; C Büchel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Effects of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (S)-ketamine in subanesthetic concentrations on visceral and somatosensory pain-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gisela Untergehrer; Denis Jordan; Sebastian Eyl; Gerhard Schneider
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain.

Authors:  Hanne Storm
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.706

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: anesthesia.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Andre De Wolf; Stanley Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A novel multivariate STeady-state index during general ANesthesia (STAN).

Authors:  Ana Castro; Fernando Gomes de Almeida; Pedro Amorim; Catarina S Nunes
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Capturing Pain in the Cortex during General Anesthesia: Near Infrared Spectroscopy Measures in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Barry D Kussman; Christopher M Aasted; Meryem A Yücel; Sarah C Steele; Mark E Alexander; David A Boas; David Borsook; Lino Becerra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Exploring the Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia Using Somatosensory and Laser Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Matthew D Jones; Janet L Taylor; John Booth; Benjamin K Barry
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.