Literature DB >> 25673731

Somatosensory spatial attention modulates amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter of laser-evoked brain potentials.

Marcel Franz1, Moritz M Nickel2, Alexander Ritter1, Wolfgang H R Miltner1, Thomas Weiss3.   

Abstract

Several studies provided evidence that the amplitudes of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) are modulated by attention. However, previous reports were based on across-trial averaging of LEP responses at the expense of losing information about intertrial variability related to attentional modulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of somatosensory spatial attention on single-trial parameters (i.e., amplitudes, latencies, and latency jitter) of LEP components (N2 and P2). Twelve subjects participated in a sustained spatial attention paradigm while noxious laser stimuli (left hand) and noxious electrical stimuli (right hand) were sequentially delivered to the dorsum of the respective hand with nonnoxious air puffs randomly interspersed within the sequence of noxious stimuli. Participants were instructed to mentally count all stimuli (i.e., noxious and nonnoxious) applied to the attended location. Laser stimuli, presented to the attended hand (ALS), elicited larger single-trial amplitudes of the N2 component compared with unattended laser stimuli (ULS). In contrast, single-trial amplitudes of the P2 component were not significantly affected by spatial attention. Single-trial latencies of the N2 and P2 were significantly smaller for ALS vs. ULS. Additionally, the across-trial latency jitter of the N2 component was reduced for ALS. Conversely, the latency jitter of the P2 component was smaller for ULS compared with ALS. With the use of single-trial analysis, the study provided new insights into brain dynamics of LEPs related to spatial attention. Our results indicate that single-trial parameters of LEP components are differentially modulated by spatial attention.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laser-evoked potentials; latency jitter; single-trial analysis; spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673731      PMCID: PMC4416583          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00070.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

1.  A new method to increase nociception specificity of the human blink reflex.

Authors:  H Kaube; Z Katsarava; T Käufer; H Diener; J Ellrich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; M Westerfield; J Townsend; E Courchesne; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: implications for the analysis of functional connectivity.

Authors:  Wilson A Truccolo; Mingzhou Ding; Kevin H Knuth; Richard Nakamura; Steven L Bressler
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potential studies.

Authors:  M Eimer; J Driver
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Selective attention to pain: a psychophysical investigation.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Deborah E Bentley; Nicola Phillips; Francis P McGlone; Anthony K P Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Improving the acquisition of nociceptive evoked potentials without causing more pain.

Authors:  John L K Kramer; Jenny Haefeli; Catherine R Jutzeler; John D Steeves; Armin Curt
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Laser-evoked potentials to noxious stimulation during hypnotic analgesia and distraction of attention suggest different brain mechanisms of pain control.

Authors:  M Friederich; R H Trippe; M Ozcan; T Weiss; H Hecht; W H Miltner
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Cognitive modulation of pain: how do attention and emotion influence pain processing?

Authors:  Chantal Villemure; Catherine M Bushnell
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials.

Authors:  Valéry Legrain; Jean-Michel Guérit; Raymond Bruyer; Léon Plaghki
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  6 in total

1.  Understanding the mechanisms through which spatial attention acts on nociception.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Intense pain influences the cortical processing of visual stimuli projected onto the sensitized skin.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Emanuel N Van Den Broeke; Lieve Filbrich; Benvenuto Jacob; Julien Lambert; André Mouraux
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.926

3.  Joint Maximum Likelihood Time Delay Estimation of Unknown Event-Related Potential Signals for EEG Sensor Signal Quality Enhancement.

Authors:  Kyungsoo Kim; Sung-Ho Lim; Jaeseok Lee; Won-Seok Kang; Cheil Moon; Ji-Woong Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Switching Between Pain and a Visual Illusion Task: A Laser Evoked Potential Study.

Authors:  Andrej Stancak; Nicholas Fallon; Alessandra Fenu; Katerina Kokmotou; Vicente Soto; Stephanie Cook
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Experimental sleep restriction increases latency jitter in pain elicited cortical responses.

Authors:  J O Hansen; P M Omland; K B Nilsen; T Sand; D Matre
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  The Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin in Humans: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Study Using Laser-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Y Paloyelis; C Krahé; S Maltezos; S C Williams; M A Howard; A Fotopoulou
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.