Literature DB >> 7888293

Different sensitivity of pain-related chemosensory potentials evoked by stimulation with CO2, tooth pulp event-related potentials, and acoustic event-related potentials to the tranquilizer diazepam.

N Thürauf1, W Ditterich, G Kobal.   

Abstract

1. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity of pain-related potentials used in experimental pain models to the non-specific effects of the tranquilizer diazepam. Pain-related potentials were recorded after painful stimulation of the nasal mucosa with CO2 and after painful stimulation of the tooth pulp. Acoustically evoked potentials were measured in order to compare their sensitivity to the tranquilizer diazepam with the sensitivity of the pain-related potentials. 2. Twenty volunteers participated in this randomised, double-blind, three-fold crossover study. Measurements were obtained before and 20 min after the administration of the drug. Event-related potentials were recorded after painful stimulation of the nasal mucosa with CO2 (two stimulus intensities: 60% v/v and 70% v/v CO2), after painful stimulation of the tooth pulp (two stimulus intensities: 2.2 x and 3.3 x detection threshold), and after non-painful acoustical stimulation of the right ear. The subjects rated the perceived intensity of the painful stimuli by means of a visual analogue scale. In addition the spontaneous EEG was analysed in the frequency domain and the vigilance of the subjects was assessed in a tracking task. 3. Diazepam reduced significantly the amplitudes of the event-related potentials after painful stimulation of the tooth pulp and after acoustical stimulation. In contrast only a small, statistically non-significant reduction could be found after painful stimulation with CO2. The pain ratings of the painful stimuli were not affected by diazepam. Diazepam reduced the performance of the tracking task. A decrease of arousal could be found in the alpha 2-range, whereas in the beta 2 and the theta-range the power density increased under diazepam. 4. We demonstrated that event-related potentials after painful stimulation of the nasal mucosa with CO2 are less affected by the nonspecific effects of the tranquilizer diazepam than event-related potentials after painful stimulation of the tooth pulp. The effects of diazepam on the tracking task, the spontaneous EEG and the event-related potentials clearly confirm its sedative properties. Diazepam had no analgesic effect measurable by pain intensity estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7888293      PMCID: PMC1364918          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04396.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  18 in total

1.  CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN.

Authors:  W G WALTER; R COOPER; V J ALDRIDGE; W C MCCALLUM; A L WINTER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Psychophysiology of experimentally induced pain.

Authors:  H O Handwerker; G Kobal
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Neuromagnetic localization of cortical activity evoked by painful dental stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Hari; E Kaukoranta; K Reinikainen; T Huopaniemie; J Mauno
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1983-11-21       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Tooth pulp-evoked potentials in the monkey: cortical surface and intracortical distribution.

Authors:  Eric H Chudler; Willie K Dong; Yoriko Kawakami
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Effects of nitrous oxide inhalation on brain potentials evoked by auditory and noxious dental stimulation.

Authors:  S W Harkins; C Benedetti; Y H Colpitts; C R Chapman
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation.

Authors:  G Kobal
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Dose-related analgesic effects of flupirtine.

Authors:  T Hummel; T Friedmann; E Pauli; G Niebch; H O Borbe; G Kobal
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined.

Authors:  C J Wysocki; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effects of nitrous oxide, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and their combination on brain potentials elicited by painful stimulation.

Authors:  C R Chapman; F Schimek; J D Gehrig; R Gerlach; Y H Colpitts
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Aspirin analgesia evaluated by event-related potentials in man: possible central action in brain.

Authors:  A C Chen; C R Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacology of analgesics assessed with human experimental pain models: bridging basic and clinical research.

Authors:  Bruno Georg Oertel; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Auditory and electroencephalographic effects of midazolam and alpha-hydroxy-midazolam in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M A Hotz; R Ritz; L Linder; G Scollo-Lavizzari; W E Haefeli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Effects of flurbiprofen enantiomers on pain-related chemo-somatosensory evoked potentials in human subjects.

Authors:  J Lötsch; G Geisslinger; P Mohammadian; K Brune; G Kobal
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Subtype-selective GABAA receptor mimetics--novel antihyperalgesic agents?

Authors:  Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer; Robert Witschi; Katharina Hösl
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Central encoding of the strength of intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimuli in a human experimental pain setting.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Bruno G Oertel; Lisa Felden; Ulrike Nöth; Ralf Deichmann; Thomas Hummel; Carmen Walter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.