Literature DB >> 28124179

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment at the Time of Screening Mammography: Perceptions and Clinical Management Outcomes for Women at High Risk.

Nichole A Morman1, Lindsey Byrne2, Christy Collins3, Kelly Reynolds4, Jeffrey G Bell4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a breast cancer risk assessment (BCRA) at the time of screening mammogram. Women whose BCRA indicated a high risk for cancer received a letter with instructions for breast health care and genetic counseling if appropriate. After 6 months this group received surveys to evaluate their risk perception and their recall of, and compliance with, recommendations. We also explored the impact of other variables such as a recommendation for genetic counseling and physician communication with the women. After the BCRA, the majority of high risk women reported no change in their perceived risk of cancer. A woman's perceived risk of cancer after a BCRA was significantly associated with her recall of recommendations for breast health care, but not with compliance. A recommendation for genetic counseling was not significantly related to women's perceived risk of cancer after the BCRA. Ten percent of women who should have obtained genetic counseling actually completed an appointment. Women who discussed their BCRA results with their physicians were more compliant with a six month breast exam with a doctor (53% vs 17%, p = 0.018). Overall, women felt that the BCRA was helpful and did not cause undue stress or anxiety. Although the cohort's compliance with recommendations was suboptimal, physicians' interactions with their patients may have a positive influence on their compliance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Genetic counseling; Risk assessment; Risk reduction behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28124179     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0050-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  21 in total

Review 1.  Available models for breast cancer risk assessment: how accurate are they?

Authors:  Julia Tchou; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose?

Authors:  Catharina E Jacobi; Geertruida H de Bock; Bob Siegerink; Christi J van Asperen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol H Lee; Marilyn Stolar; Elizabeth B Claus; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Consent for genetics studies among clinical trial participants: findings from Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD).

Authors:  M A Espeland; K Dotson; S A Jaramillo; S E Kahn; B Harrison; M Montez; J P Foreyt; B Montgomery; W C Knowler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Sample bias among women with retained DNA samples for future genetic studies.

Authors:  Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery; Baha Sibai; Catherine Y Spong; Valerija Momirova; George Wendel; Katharine Wenstrom; Philip Samuels; Margaret Cotroneo; Atef Moawad; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Paul Meis; Mary J O'Sullivan; Deborah Conway; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Participant characteristics that influence consent for genetic research in a population-based survey: the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up.

Authors:  Briana Mezuk; William W Eaton; Peter Zandi
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-03-26

Review 8.  Breast cancer risk-assessment models.

Authors:  D Gareth R Evans; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Physicians' influence on breast cancer patient compliance.

Authors:  Karel Kostev; Lilia Waehlert; Achim Jockwig; Barbara Jockwig; Peyman Hadji
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-20

10.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Kathryn S Porter; Maria Agelli; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening: in the era of personalized medicine, age is just a number.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi; Simone Schiaffino; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

2.  Women's views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women's clinics.

Authors:  A Rundle; S Iles; K Matheson; L E Cahill; C C Forbes; N Saint-Jacques; R Urquhart; T Younis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Effect of a Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention on Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Suzanne C O'Neill; Tengfei Li; Sarah Knerr; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz; Jinani Jayasekera; Kathleen Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; David Farrell; Hongyuan Gao; Amanda L Graham; George Luta; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Population screening to identify women at risk for hereditary breast cancer syndromes: The path forward or the road not taken?

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Pam Ganschow; Catharine Wang; Kent F Hoskins
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Increasing referral of at-risk women for genetic counseling and BRCA testing using a screening tool in a community breast imaging center.

Authors:  Banu K Arun; Susan K Peterson; Lilian E Sweeney; Rachel D Bluebond; Rebecca S S Tidwell; Sukh Makhnoon; Anne C Kushwaha
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rita Kukafka; Samuel Pan; Thomas Silverman; Tianmai Zhang; Wendy K Chung; Mary Beth Terry; Elaine Fleck; Richard G Younge; Meghna S Trivedi; Julia E McGuinness; Ting He; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.