Literature DB >> 15020172

Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Maria C Katapodi1, Kathy A Lee, Noreen C Facione, Marylin J Dodd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perceived risk is a principal variable in theoretical models that attempt to predict the adoption of health-protective behaviors.
METHODS: This meta-analysis synthesizes findings from 42 studies, identified in PubMed and PsycInfo from 1985 onward. Studies examined demographic and psychological variables as predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relationship between perceived risk and breast cancer screening. Statistical relationships, weighted for sample size, were transformed to effect sizes and 95% CIs.
RESULTS: Women do not have accurate perceptions of their breast cancer risk (N = 5561, g = 1.10). Overall, they have an optimistic bias about their personal risk (g = 0.99). However, having a positive family history (N = 70660, g = 0.88), recruitment site, and measurement error confounded these results. Perceived risk is weakly influenced by age (N = 38000, g = 0.13) and education (N = 1979, g = 0.16), and is moderately affected by race/culture (N = 2192, g = 0.38) and worry (N = 6090, g = 0.49). There is an association between perceived risk and mammography screening (N = 52766, g = 0.19). It is not clear whether perceived risk influences adherence to breast self-examination. Women who perceived a higher breast cancer risk were more likely to pursue genetic testing or undergo prophylactic mastectomy.
CONCLUSION: Perceived breast cancer risk depends on psychological and cognitive variables and influences adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15020172     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  172 in total

1.  Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

2.  Effects of integrated risk counseling for cancer and cardiovascular disease in African Americans.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Scarlett Bellamy; Marjorie Bowman; Vanessa Briggs; Ernestine Delmoor; Joseph Purnell; Rodney Rogers; Benita Weathers; Shiriki Kumanyika
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Vickie L Shavers; Levi Ross; Willie Underwood
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-08

4.  Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli M Bollinger; Rachel L Dvoskin; Joan A Scott
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The Relationship of Perceived Risk and Biases in Perceived Risk to Fracture Prevention Behavior in Older Women.

Authors:  Salene M W Jones; Nancy M Gell; Joshua A Roth; Delia Scholes; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

6.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

7.  Breast cancer-specific intrusions are associated with increased cortisol responses to daily life stressors in healthy women without personal or family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lucia Dettenborn; Gary D James; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Guy H Montgomery; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-08-30

8.  Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Susan T Vadaparampil; Susan Eggly; Richard L Street; Tanina Foster Moore; Claudine Isaacs; Hyo S Han; Bianca Augusto; Jennifer Garcia; Katherine Lopez; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Franco Sassi; Harold S Luft; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Alicia Gonzales; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Janet Williams; Monica Saavedra-Embesi; Wenyaw Chan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.