Literature DB >> 18376114

Participant characteristics that influence consent for genetic research in a population-based survey: the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up.

Briana Mezuk1, William W Eaton, Peter Zandi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the sociodemographic and health characteristics associated with the willingness to donate a DNA sample, and consent to testing and long-term storage of that sample, among participants in a longitudinal community-based survey. SAMPLE: Eighty-three percent of the 1,071 participants interviewed in 2004/5 agreed to donate a biological specimen (blood or buccal).
RESULTS: Age was consistently inversely associated with the willingness to allow genetic testing (OR 0.97; p < 0.05), but was unrelated to the willingness to donate or allow storage. There was no association between race and the consent to donate a specimen, but Blacks were less likely to consent to DNA storage for future research as compared with members of other racial groups (OR 0.50; p < 0.01). Four conditions were listed on the consent form as relevant to the genes targeted for assay. Participants with a family history of 1 or more of these conditions were more likely to donate than those without (OR 1.68; p < 0.01). Participants with a personal history of 1 of the 4 conditions listed were not more or less likely to donate, allow testing or allow storage than respondents without such a history.
CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic characteristics were unrelated to the willingness to donate a biological sample. Age, but not race, sex or education, was related to consent to genetic testing. Race, but not age, sex or education, was related to consent to storage. A family history of health conditions listed as relevant to the assays being requested was related to the willingness to donate. Factors that affect the willingness to donate a biological sample in an epidemiologic study are not the same as those associated with the willingness to allow genetic testing or storage of that sample for unspecified future research. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18376114      PMCID: PMC2853229          DOI: 10.1159/000113880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Genet        ISSN: 1422-2795


  42 in total

1.  Reforming informed consent to genetic research.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?

Authors:  Asa Kettis-Lindblad; Lena Ring; Eva Viberth; Mats G Hansson
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study.

Authors:  L Le Marchand; A Lum-Jones; B Saltzman; V Visaya; A M Nomura; L N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  A comparison of self-report and clinical diagnostic interviews for depression: diagnostic interview schedule and schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up.

Authors:  W W Eaton; K Neufeld; L S Chen; G Cai
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-03

6.  Predictors of participation in genetic research in a primary care physician network.

Authors:  A W Helmes; D J Bowen; R Bowden; J Bengel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.

Authors:  J M Trauth; D Musa; L Siminoff; I K Jewell; E Ricci
Journal:  J Health Soc Policy       Date:  2000

8.  Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; K Rothenberg; L Joseph; J Benkendorf; C Lerman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-02-01

9.  Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients.

Authors:  Rebecca D Pentz; Laurent Billot; David Wendler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: an update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Qiyuan Pan; Kathryn S Porter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  25 in total

1.  Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories.

Authors:  Yeyang Su; Heidi C Howard; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-05-28

2.  Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Daniel R Morrison; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Sex hormone binding globulin and verbal memory in older men.

Authors:  Yoichiro Takayanagi; Adam P Spira; Roger S McIntyre; William W Eaton
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Inclusion of African Americans in genetic studies: what is the barrier?

Authors:  Sarah M Hartz; Eric O Johnson; Nancy L Saccone; Dorothy Hatsukami; Naomi Breslau; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Biobanking residual tissues.

Authors:  Peter H J Riegman; Evert-Ben van Veen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

8.  The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development.

Authors:  Blake J Roessler; Nicholas H Steneck; Lisa Connally
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Benefits and Risks in Secondary Use of Digitized Clinical Data: Views of Community Members Living in a Predominantly Ethnic Minority Urban Neighborhood.

Authors:  Robert J Lucero; Joan Kearney; Yamnia Cortes; Adriana Arcia; Paul Appelbaum; Roberto Lewis Fernández; Jose Luchsinger
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

10.  Population-based study of first onset and chronicity in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  William W Eaton; Huibo Shao; Gerald Nestadt; Hochang Benjamin Lee; Ben Hochang Lee; O Joseph Bienvenu; Peter Zandi
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.