Literature DB >> 32669942

Women's views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women's clinics.

A Rundle1, S Iles2,3, K Matheson4,5, L E Cahill3,5,6, C C Forbes3,5, N Saint-Jacques5,7, R Urquhart3,6, T Younis3,5.   

Abstract

Background: Women attending mammography screening units (msus) and well women's clinics (wwcs) represent a motivated cohort likely to engage in interventions aimed at primary breast cancer (bca) prevention.
Methods: We used a feasibility questionnaire distributed to women (40-49 or 50-74 years of age) attending msus and wwcs in Halifax, Nova Scotia, to examine■ women's views about bca primary prevention and sources of health care information,■ prevalence of lifestyle-related bca risk factors, and■ predictors of prior mammography encounters within provincial screening guidelines.Variables examined included personal profiling, comorbidities, prior mammography uptake, lifestyle behaviours, socioeconomic status, health information sources, and willingness to discuss or implement lifestyle modifications, or endocrine therapy, or both. A logistic regression analysis examined associations with prior mammography encounters.
Results: Of the 244 responses obtained during 1.5 months from women aged 40-49 years (n = 75) and 50-74 years (n = 169), 56% and 75% respectively sought or would prefer to receive health information from within, as opposed to outside, health care. Lifestyle-related bca risk factors were prevalent, and most women were willing to discuss or implement lifestyle modifications (93%) or endocrine therapy (67%). Of the two age groups, 49% and 93% respectively had previously undergone mammography within guidelines. Increasing age and marital status (single, separated, or divorced vs. married or partnered) were independent predictors of prior mammography encounters within guidelines for women 40-49 years of age; no independent predictors were observed in the older age group. Conclusions: Women attending msus and wwcs seem to largely adhere to mammography guidelines and appear motivated to engage in bca primary prevention strategies, including lifestyle modifications and endocrine therapy. Women's views as observed in this study provide a rationale for the potential incorporation of bca risk assessment within the "mammogram point of care" to engage motivated women in bca primary prevention strategies. 2020 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prevention; breast cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32669942      PMCID: PMC7339851          DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  15 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Michel Joffres; James Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Gabriela Lewin; Richard Birtwhistle; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Nicole Hodgson; Donna Ciliska; Mary Gauld; Yan Yun Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.

Authors:  Jon M Greif
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Jean O'Malley; David I Buckley; Motomi Mori; David A Lieberman; Lyle J Fagnan; James Wallace; Betty Liu; Cynthia Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cancer survivors' uptake and adherence in diet and exercise intervention trials: an integrative data analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Cindy K Blair; Denise C Snyder; Richard Sloane; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Lifestyle and cancer prevention in women: knowledge, perceptions, and compliance with recommended guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Diana W Stewart; Stephen C Stuyck; Jo Ann Ward; Amanda K Brown; Courtenay Smith; David W Wetter
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Breast Cancer Risk Assessment at the Time of Screening Mammography: Perceptions and Clinical Management Outcomes for Women at High Risk.

Authors:  Nichole A Morman; Lindsey Byrne; Christy Collins; Kelly Reynolds; Jeffrey G Bell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Breast Cancer Prevention: Current Approaches and Future Directions.

Authors:  Edward R Sauter
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-04-01

Review 8.  Cancer Hallmarks, Biomarkers and Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Dai; Liangjian Xiang; Ting Li; Zhonghu Bai
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Life-course socioeconomic status and breast and cervical cancer screening: analysis of the WHO's Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE).

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Kemi Ogunsina; Swati Sakhuja; Valentine Ogbhodo; Dejana Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Lifestyle changes for prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Seyed Hesam Bani Hashemi; Samieh Karimi; Hamidreza Mahboobi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2014-07-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identify factors for insufficient (> 2 yr) mammogram screening among Oregonian women.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Zhang; Grace Curran; Kenneth Xu; Jeong Youn Lim; Paige E Farris; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.532

2.  Women's perceptions of PERSPECTIVE: a breast cancer risk stratification e-platform.

Authors:  Saima Ahmed; Emmanuelle Lévesque; Rosalind Garland; Bartha Knoppers; Michel Dorval; Jacques Simard; Carmen G Loiselle
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.857

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.