OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether women who agree to future use of their biologic specimens for genetic studies reflect the larger study population from which they are derived. METHODS: Women were questioned as to the future disposition of their maternal and fetal DNA samples upon enrollment in a multicenter, observational study originally designed to identify factor V Leiden mutation carriers and prospectively ascertain the estimated rate of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism and adverse pregnancy outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses was carried out on the 5,003 of 5,188 enrolled women who indicated their desire regarding future disposition of their DNA samples. RESULTS: Among these 5,003 women, 20.1% desired that their samples be discarded and not available for future genetic studies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that women who agreed to subsequent use of samples were less likely African-American (odds ratio [OR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7) or Hispanic (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.5), and more likely to use tobacco (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.6) than those who desired that their samples be discarded. CONCLUSION: Genetic samples from women agreeing to their use in a sample repository may not be representative of the index study cohort. This should be considered in their subsequent interpretation and generalizability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether women who agree to future use of their biologic specimens for genetic studies reflect the larger study population from which they are derived. METHODS:Women were questioned as to the future disposition of their maternal and fetal DNA samples upon enrollment in a multicenter, observational study originally designed to identify factor V Leiden mutation carriers and prospectively ascertain the estimated rate of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism and adverse pregnancy outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses was carried out on the 5,003 of 5,188 enrolled women who indicated their desire regarding future disposition of their DNA samples. RESULTS: Among these 5,003 women, 20.1% desired that their samples be discarded and not available for future genetic studies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that women who agreed to subsequent use of samples were less likely African-American (odds ratio [OR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7) or Hispanic (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.5), and more likely to use tobacco (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.6) than those who desired that their samples be discarded. CONCLUSION: Genetic samples from women agreeing to their use in a sample repository may not be representative of the index study cohort. This should be considered in their subsequent interpretation and generalizability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: David M Haas; Jamie L Renbarger; Scott Denne; Mahmoud S Ahmed; Thomas Easterling; Karen Feibus; Eric M Meslin; Gideon Koren; Anne Zajicek; Wayne R Snodgrass; David A Flockhart Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery; Catherine Y Spong; Elizabeth Thom; Baha Sibai; George Wendel; Katharine Wenstrom; Philip Samuels; Hyagriv Simhan; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Paul Meis; Mary J O'Sullivan; Deborah Conway; Ronald J Wapner Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Sarah M Hartz; Eric O Johnson; Nancy L Saccone; Dorothy Hatsukami; Naomi Breslau; Laura J Bierut Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Wade D Rich; Kathy J Auten; Marie G Gantz; Ellen C Hale; Angelita M Hensman; Nancy S Newman; Neil N Finer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Marilyn Coors; Susan Mikulich-Gilbertson; Kristen Raymond; Shannon Stover; Thomas Crowley; Sandra Brown; Susan Tapert Journal: Am J Bioeth Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 11.229
Authors: Susan Brown Trinidad; Stephanie M Fullerton; Julie M Bares; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Wylie Burke Journal: Genet Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 8.822