Literature DB >> 28123033

The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.

Yu-Chin Chiu1, Jiefeng Jiang2, Tobias Egner2,3.   

Abstract

A longstanding dichotomy in cognitive psychology and neuroscience pits controlled, top-down driven behavior against associative, bottom-up driven behavior, where cognitive control processes allow us to override well-learned stimulus-response (S-R) associations. By contrast, some previous studies have raised the intriguing possibility of an integration between associative and controlled processing in the form of stimulus-control state (S-C) associations, the learned linkage of specific stimuli to particular control states, such as high attentional selectivity. The neural machinery mediating S-C learning remains poorly understood, however. Here, we combined human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a previously developed Stroop protocol that allowed us to dissociate reductions in Stroop interference based on S-R learning from those based on S-C learning. We modeled subjects' acquisition of S-C and S-R associations using an associative learning model and then used trial-by-trial S-C and S-R prediction error (PE) estimates in model-based behavioral and fMRI analyses. We found that PE estimates derived from S-C and S-R associations accounted for the reductions in behavioral Stroop interference effects in the S-C and S-R learning conditions, respectively. Moreover, model-based fMRI analyses identified the caudate nucleus as the key structure involved in selectively updating stimulus-control state associations. Complementary analyses also revealed a greater reliance on parietal cortex when using the learned S-R versus S-C associations to minimize Stroop interference. These results support the emerging view that generalizable control states can become associated with specific bottom-up cues, and they place the caudate nucleus of the dorsal striatum at the center of the neural stimulus-control learning machinery. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Previous behavioral studies have demonstrated that control states, for instance, heightened attentional selectivity, can become directly associated with, and subsequently retrieved by, particular stimuli, thus breaking down the traditional dichotomy between top-down and bottom-up driven behavior. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this type of stimulus-control learning remain poorly understood. We therefore combined noninvasive human neuroimaging with a task that allowed us to dissociate the acquisition of stimulus-control associations from that of stimulus-response associations. The results revealed the caudate nucleus as the key brain structure involved in selectively driving stimulus-control learning. These data represent the first identification of the neural mechanisms of stimulus-specific control associations, and they significantly extend current conceptions of the type of learning processes mediated by the caudate.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/371028-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caudate; cognitive control; fMRI; learning; memory; prediction error

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123033      PMCID: PMC5296776          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0778-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; D Stephen Lindsay; Sandra Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Swati Chanani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Contextual control over task-set retrieval.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: location as a contextual cue.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; Zhiyu Gong; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring.

Authors:  Chris Blais; Silvia Bunge
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning.

Authors:  K Sakai; O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; R Takino; Y Sasaki; B Pütz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Context-dependent control over attentional capture.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Priming of control: implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set.

Authors:  Joseph A King; Franziska M Korb; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A specific role for posterior dorsolateral striatum in human habit learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tricomi; Bernard W Balleine; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Russell A Poldrack; Thomas E Nichols; David C Van Essen; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Hunger and BMI modulate neural responses to sweet stimuli: fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eunice Y Chen; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Hierarchically Organized Medial Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia Loops Selectively Control Task- and Response-Selection.

Authors:  Franziska M Korb; Jiefeng Jiang; Joseph A King; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The Timescale of Control: A Meta-Control Property that Generalizes across Tasks but Varies between Types of Control.

Authors:  Abhishek Dey; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.

Authors:  Audrey Siqi-Liu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neural Mechanisms of Strategic Adaptation in Attentional Flexibility.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Temporal Dynamics of Memory-guided Cognitive Control and Generalization of Control via Overlapping Associative Memories.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Inês Bramão; Anna Khazenzon; Shao-Fang Wang; Mikael Johansson; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Causal Evidence for Learning-Dependent Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to context-control learning.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The flexibility of cognitive control: Age equivalence with experience guiding the way.

Authors:  Emily R Cohen-Shikora; Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.