Literature DB >> 28716966

Hierarchically Organized Medial Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia Loops Selectively Control Task- and Response-Selection.

Franziska M Korb1, Jiefeng Jiang2, Joseph A King2, Tobias Egner1,3.   

Abstract

Adaptive behavior requires context-sensitive configuration of task-sets that specify time-varying stimulus-response mappings. Intriguingly, response time costs associated with changing task-sets and motor responses are known to be strongly interactive: switch costs at the task level are small in the presence of a response-switch but large when accompanied by a response-repetition, and vice versa for response-switch costs. The reasons behind this well known interdependence between task- and response-level control processes are currently not well understood. Here, we formalized and tested a model assuming a hierarchical organization of superordinate task-set and subordinate response-set selection processes to account for this effect. The model was found to successfully explain the full range of behavioral task- and response-switch costs across first and second order trial transitions. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in healthy humans, we then characterized the neural circuitry mediating these effects. We found that presupplementary motor area (preSMA) activity tracked task-set control costs, SMA activity tracked response-set control costs, and basal ganglia (BG) activity mirrored the interaction between task- and response-set regulation processes that characterized participants' response times. A subsequent fMRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation experiment confirmed dissociable roles of the preSMA and SMA in determining response costs. Together, these data provide evidence for a hierarchical organization of posterior medial frontal cortex and its interaction with the BG, where a superordinate preSMA-BG loop establishes task-set selection, which imposes a (unidirectional) constraint on a subordinate SMA-BG loop that determines response-selection, resulting in the characteristic interdependence in task- and response-switch costs in behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The ability to use context-sensitive task-sets to guide our responses is central to human adaptive behavior. Task and response selection are strongly interactive: it is more difficult to repeat a response in the context of a changing task-set, and vice versa. However, the neurocognitive architecture giving rise to this interdependence is currently not understood. Here we use modeling, neuroimaging, and noninvasive neurostimulation to show that this phenomenon derives from a hierarchical organization of posterior medial frontal cortex and its interaction with the basal ganglia, where a more anterior corticostriatal loop establishes task-set selection, which constrains a more posterior loop responsible for response-selection. These data provide a neural explanation for a key behavioral signature of human cognitive control.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377893-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; cognitive control; fMRI; response-selection; task-switching

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28716966      PMCID: PMC5559764          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3289-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

1.  Corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic input zones from the presupplementary motor area in the macaque monkey: comparison with the input zones from the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  M Inase; H Tokuno; A Nambu; T Akazawa; M Takada
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-07-03       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience--virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; V Walsh; J Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Scott A Huettel; Peter B Mack; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

6.  Adaptive coding of task-relevant information in human frontoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Alexandra Woolgar; Adam Hampshire; Russell Thompson; John Duncan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas.

Authors:  Parashkev Nachev; Christopher Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.

Authors:  Anders Eklund; Thomas E Nichols; Hans Knutsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.

Authors:  Choong-Wan Woo; Anjali Krishnan; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  10 in total

1.  More evidence that a switch is not (always) a switch: Binning bilinguals reveals dissociations between task and language switching.

Authors:  Dorit Segal; Alena Stasenko; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-11-05

2.  Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Abstract sequential task control is facilitated by practice and embedded motor sequences.

Authors:  Juliana E Trach; Theresa H McKim; Theresa M Desrochers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.

Authors:  Lei Qiao; Lijie Zhang; Antao Chen; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Motor Preparation Disrupts Proactive Control in the Stop Signal Task.

Authors:  Wuyi Wang; Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Simon Zhornitsky; Sheng Zhang; Angela J Yu; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Uncovering hidden brain state dynamics that regulate performance and decision-making during cognition.

Authors:  Jalil Taghia; Weidong Cai; Srikanth Ryali; John Kochalka; Jonathan Nicholas; Tianwen Chen; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Conjunctive representations that integrate stimuli, responses, and rules are critical for action selection.

Authors:  Atsushi Kikumoto; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Frontopolar Cortex Specializes for Manipulation of Structured Information.

Authors:  James Kroger; Chobok Kim
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-02

9.  Do Overweight People Have Worse Cognitive Flexibility? Cues-Triggered Food Craving May Have a Greater Impact.

Authors:  Shiqing Song; Qingqing Li; Yan Jiang; Yong Liu; Aidi Xu; Xinyuan Liu; Hong Chen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Fronto-parietal homotopy in resting-state functional connectivity predicts task-switching performance.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Antonino Visalli; Zeus Gracia-Tabuenca; Vincenza Tarantino; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Sarael Alcauter; Dante Mantini; Lorenzo Pini
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.270

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.