Literature DB >> 16893001

The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: location as a contextual cue.

Matthew J C Crump1, Zhiyu Gong, Bruce Milliken.   

Abstract

The Stroop effect has been shown to depend on the relative proportion of congruent and incongruent trials. This effect is commonly attributed to experiment-wide word-reading strategies that change as a function of proportion congruent. Recently, Jacoby, Lindsay, and Hessels (2003) reported an item-specific proportion congruent effect that cannot be due to these strategies and instead may reflect rapid, stimulus driven control over word-reading processes. However, an item-specific proportion congruent effect may also reflect learned associations between color word identities and responses. In two experiments, we demonstrate a context-specific proportion congruent effect that cannot be explained by such word-response associations. Our results suggest that processes other than learning of word-response associations can produce contextual control over Stroop interference.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16893001     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; D Stephen Lindsay; Sandra Hessels
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

3.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-12

Review 4.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  J D Cohen; K Dunbar; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults.

Authors:  R West; G C Baylis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-06

7.  What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task.

Authors:  D G Lowe; J O Mitterer
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-12
  10 in total
  66 in total

1.  Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes.

Authors:  Beatriz R Sarmiento; Pawel J Matusz; Daniel Sanabria; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The time course of cognitive control implementation.

Authors:  Clio Janssens; Esther De Loof; Gilles Pourtois; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

3.  Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?

Authors:  Caroline Gottschalk; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-05

4.  Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Location-specific versus hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Rainer H Kluwe; Ina Vietze
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

6.  On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

7.  Conflict adaptation in time: foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

Review 8.  Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

9.  Perceptual similarity induces overinvestment in an attentional blink task.

Authors:  Ellen MacLellan; David I Shore; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-28

Review 10.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.