Literature DB >> 30080058

The flexibility of cognitive control: Age equivalence with experience guiding the way.

Emily R Cohen-Shikora1, Nathaniel T Diede1, Julie M Bugg1.   

Abstract

Prior research has shown that aging is accompanied by changes in cognitive control. Older adults are less effective in maintaining an attentional bias in favor of goal-relevant information and are less flexible in shifting control relative to younger adults. Using a novel variant of the Stroop color-naming task, we tested the hypothesis that age-related differences in the flexible shifting of control may be small or absent when control is guided by experience (i.e., environmental input guiding attention). Younger and older adults named the color of color words in abbreviated lists of trials. In Experiment 1, experience within the early segment of the list was manipulated to encourage adoption of more (mostly congruent condition) or less (mostly incongruent condition) attention toward the word. More important, the middle and late portions were 50% congruent in both conditions. Older adults, like younger adults, demonstrated flexible acquisition and shifting of control settings (i.e., relative attention to word vs. color information). In Experiment 2 we replicated this finding. Additionally, we found that both age groups flexibly acquired and shifted control settings for "transfer" items (i.e., items that were 50% congruent in all lists and list segments), pointing to a generalizable (i.e., global) form of control rather than an item-specific mechanism. Discussion focuses on the role of experience-guided control in enabling flexible performance in older adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30080058      PMCID: PMC6131046          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  66 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota; D H Spieler; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-12

4.  It is not what you expect: dissociating conflict adaptation from expectancies in a Stroop task.

Authors:  Luis Jiménez; Amavia Méndez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Alicia Smallwood
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-19

6.  Distraction can reduce age-related forgetting.

Authors:  Renée K Biss; K W Joan Ngo; Lynn Hasher; Karen L Campbell; Gillian Rowe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-20

7.  Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: theory and data.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Selective and divided Attention in a Stroop task.

Authors:  D G Lowe; J O Mitterer
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1982-12

9.  Conflict-triggered top-down control: default mode, last resort, or no such thing?

Authors:  Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Corentin Gonthier; Todd S Braver; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of proportion manipulation on the size-congruency and distance effects in the numerical Stroop task.

Authors:  Ido Shichel; Liat Goldfarb
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-07

2.  The shaping of cognitive control based on the adaptive weighting of expectations and experience.

Authors:  Jihyun Suh; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.