| Literature DB >> 28122467 |
Minna Laitinen1,2, Jyrki Nieminen2, Aleksi Reito3, Toni-Karri Pakarinen1,2, Piia Suomalainen1, Konsta Pamilo3, Jyrki Parkkinen4, Tonis Lont2, Antti Eskelinen2.
Abstract
Background and purpose - There has been increasing alarm regarding metal-on-metal (MoM) joint replacements leading to elevated levels of metal ions and adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMDs). There is little information available concerning the prevalence of and risk factors for these adverse reactions, except with MoM hip joint replacements. We determined the levels of metal ions in blood and the rate of revision due to ARMDs in patients treated with MoM hinge total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and methods - 22 patients with TKAs and MoM hinge connecting mechanisms were studied for whole-blood chromium and cobalt levels at 6 months, 1 year, and/or ≥2 years after surgery. Possible ARMDs were investigated by MRI. 12 patients with TKAs and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) connecting mechanisms served as controls. Results - The cobalt levels were over 5 ppb in 19 of the 22 patients in the MoM group and in 1 of the 12 patients in the MoP group. The chromium levels were over 5 ppb in 11 of the 22 patients in the MoM group and in none of the 12 patients in the MoP group. Pseudotumors were operated in 4 of the 22 patients in the MoM group and in none of the patients in the MoP group. Interpretation - Our results clearly show that the MoM hinge TKA carries a high risk of increased levels of systemic metal ions and also local ARMD, leading to complicated knee revisions. We therefore discourage the use of MoM hinge TKA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28122467 PMCID: PMC5434594 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1283846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop ISSN: 1745-3674 Impact factor: 3.717
Clinical and laboratory findings
| MoP (n = 12) | MoM (n = 22) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female | 2/10 | 9/13 | 0.1 |
| Mean age, years (range) | 71 (33–91) | 53 (16–88) | 0.02 |
| Mean follow-up, years (range) | 2 (0–7) | 3 (1–6) | 0.01 |
| Alive at follow-up | 8 | 19 | 0.2 |
| Indication for surgery | |||
| Tumor (n = 14) | 5 | 9 | |
| Revision arthroplasty (n = 20) | 7 | 13 | |
| aseptic loosening (n = 8) | 3 | 5 | |
| periprosthetic fracture (n = 8) | 3 | 5 | |
| infection (n = 4) | 1 | 4 | |
| Anatomic site | |||
| Proximal tibia | 0 | 5 | |
| Distal femur | 12 | 17 | |
| Cobalt, number of observations (MoP/MoM), mean ppb (range) | |||
| Total (n = 23/40) | 1.7 (0.3–7.3) | 17.8 (1.5–76.6) | < 0.001 |
| 6 months (n = 10/11) | 1.1 (0.4–3.6) | 10.8 (2.6–24.1) | 0.001 |
| 1 year (n = 8/12) | 1.9 (0.3–7.3) | 20.1 (3.1–76.6) | < 0.001 |
| ≥ 2 years (n = 5/17) | 0.3 (0.3–0.3) | 17.1 (1.5–46.0) | 0.002 |
| Number exceeding 5 ppb | 1 | 19 | < 0.001 |
| Chromium, number of observations (MoP/MoM), mean ppb (range) | |||
| Total (n = 23/40) | 1.4 (0.7–4.6) | 6.6 (0.7–25.5) | < 0.001 |
| 6 months (n = 10/11) | 0.8 (0.3–2.0) | 4.4 (1.2–13.0) | < 0.001 |
| 1 year (n = 8/12) | 1.4 (0.3–4.6) | 7.4 (2.1–25.5) | < 0.001 |
| ≥ 2 years (n = 5/17) | 1.9 (0.9–2.5) | 6.3 (0.7–11.0) | 0.08 |
| Number exceeding 5 ppb | 0 | 11 | < 0.001 |
| MRI done | 4 | 10 | 0.2 |
| Surgically treated pseudotumors | 0 | 4 | 0.2 |
| Cardiac failure | 0 | 2 | 0.4 |
Figure 1.Comparison of cobalt ion levels (left panel) and chromium ion levels (right panel), in ppb. The bottom, middle, and top horizontal lines of the boxes represent the first quartile, the median, and the third quartile. The ends of the whiskers correspond to the limits of the data, beyond which any values are considered anomalous. Dots show the outler levels measured. The horizontal line corresponds to 5 ppb.
Figure 2.Changes in mean serum cobalt levels (left) and mean serum chromium levels (right)in ppb at different time points, with 95% confidence intervals measured by repeated-measures ANOVA.
Revisions due to adverse reaction to metal debris
| Gender | Site | Age | Reason | Hart’s classification | Years to revision | Co level ppb | Cr level ppb | ALVAL score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Distal femur | 25 | Tumor | 2a | 1 | 27 | 11 | |
| Male | Distal femur | 67 | Revision | 2a | 3 | 18 | 5.3 | 8 |
| Male | Distal femur | 64 | Tumor | 3 | 3 | 46 | 11 | 7 |
| Male | Distal femur | 72 | Revision | 3 | 3 | 14 | 7.2 |
ALVAL score: Aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion score.
Figure 3.Images from a 25-year-old man who had undergone distal femoral replacement 1 year earlier due to a primary bone tumor. He had a swelling in the region of the operated knee. Axial view showed a thin-walled cystic pseudotumor with liquid-like low signal intensity (left panel). Aspirations were repeatedly negative for bacterial growth and showed the typical appearance of metal reaction (right panel).
Figure 4.A 72-year-old man had a revision arthroplasty with hinge MoM after multiple failed knee arthroplasty revisions. After 3 years, he developed a massive soft tissue expansion around the distal femur. During revision arthroplasty, a thick-walled pseudotumor with solid components was encountered.