Achieving efficient nonenzymatic replication of RNA is an important step toward the synthesis of self-replicating protocells that may mimic early forms of life. Despite recent progress, the nonenzymatic copying of templates containing mixed sequences remains slow and inefficient. Here we demonstrate that activating nucleotides with 2-aminoimidazole results in superior reaction kinetics and improved yields of primer extension reaction products. This new leaving group significantly accelerates monomer addition as well as trimer-assisted RNA primer extension, allowing efficient copying of a variety of short RNA templates with mixed sequences.
Achieving efficient nonenzymatic replication of RNA is an important step toward the synthesis of self-replicating protocells that may mimic early forms of life. Despite recent progress, the nonenzymatic copying of templates containing mixed sequences remains slow and inefficient. Here we demonstrate that activating nucleotides with 2-aminoimidazole results in superior reaction kinetics and improved yields of primer extension reaction products. This new leaving group significantly accelerates monomer addition as well as trimer-assisted RNA primer extension, allowing efficient copying of a variety of short RNA templates with mixed sequences.
Replication of the genetic information
is a key chemical process in living organisms. Whereas modern cells
copy their genomes using sophisticated protein enzymes, primordial
cells had to rely on primitive mechanisms without access to an elaborate
translation system. One such mechanism is nonenzymatic RNA replication,[1] in which chemically activated nucleotides, such
as phosphoroimidazolides, spontaneously polymerize when guided by
a template sequence. Its simplicity has made it an attractive approach
in laboratory attempts to develop self-replicating protocells that
mimic early forms of life.[2] However, a
major limitation of this approach is its poor yield and slow rate,
particularly when copying templates with mixed sequences.[3] Here we report the development of a superior
leaving group, 2-aminoimidazole, which enables efficient copying of
short RNA templates with mixed sequences.Since the discovery
in 1981 that 2-methylimidazole (2-MI) activated
nucleotides show both good reactivity and the ability to direct the
formation of natural 3′-5′ linkages, 2-MI has been the
most widely used leaving group for studies of nonenzymatic RNA template
copying by primer extension.[4] Interestingly,
2-MI activated monomers are more reactive in primer extension than
the corresponding imidazole and 4-methylimidazole derivatives,[4] both of which contain better leaving groups than
2-MI as judged by their hydrolysis rates.[5] The higher reactivity of 2-MI activated nucleotides has been attributed
to an interaction between leaving groups of neighboring monomers,
such that the leaving group on the downstream nucleotide exhibits
a catalytic effect that increases the rate of reaction between the
upstream nucleotide and the adjacent primer.[6] This leaving-group interaction accelerates the primer extension
reaction by 10–100 times, depending on whether the downstream
nucleotide is an activated monomer[6] or
an activated oligonucleotide.[7] We have
recently suggested that the physical origin of this rate enhancement
is due to the covalent reaction of 2-MI-activated monomers with each
other to form imidazolium bridged dinucleotides, which are highly
reactive intermediates in the copying of RNA templates by primer extension.[8]In an effort parallel to the above mechanistic
investigations,[5−8] we sought to develop a leaving group with enhanced catalytic activity
when used to activate nucleotides in positions downstream of the reaction
site from a screen of leaving groups. We measured primer extension
rates on a template that encodes the product sequence -CGGG-3′.
Reaction mixtures contained C monomers activated by 2-MI (2-MeImpC),
which could only bind the initial +1 position, and G monomers activated
by various leaving groups, which could only bind downstream (1a–1h, Figure ). The results revealed two general trends.
First, a larger substituent at the 2-position slows down the reaction
(1a–1d). Second, the reaction rate
decreases as the pKa of the leaving group
decreases (1a, 1e–1h). Replacing 2-MI on the downstream G monomers by 2-methylpyrrole
(1i) abolishes the catalytic effect, indicating that
neither pi-stacking between neighboring leaving groups, nor the NH
moiety alone, which may serve as a hydrogen-bond donor, are sufficient
to catalyze primer extension; the lack of a catalytic effect is consistent
with primer extension proceeding through an imidazolium-bridged intermediate.
Figure 1
Development
of 2-aminoimidazole as a superior leaving group for
nonenzymatic primer extension. Top row: the template (cyan)-dependent
reaction of 2-MI activated C monomers (red) with the primer (green)
was used to probe the effect of adjacent leaving groups (LG, black)
on the reaction rate. Curved arrow indicates the site of reaction.
Varying the leaving group (1a–1k)
influenced the rates by up to 200 times, with 2-aminoimidazole (1j) giving the fastest rate. Reaction conditions: 1.5 μM
primer, 5 μM template, 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM monomers. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Blue: mean observed rate in h–1; standard error
of the mean (s.e.m.) in the last digit is shown in parentheses. Magenta:
pKa of the leaving group.
Development
of 2-aminoimidazole as a superior leaving group for
nonenzymatic primer extension. Top row: the template (cyan)-dependent
reaction of 2-MI activated C monomers (red) with the primer (green)
was used to probe the effect of adjacent leaving groups (LG, black)
on the reaction rate. Curved arrow indicates the site of reaction.
Varying the leaving group (1a–1k)
influenced the rates by up to 200 times, with 2-aminoimidazole (1j) giving the fastest rate. Reaction conditions: 1.5 μM
primer, 5 μM template, 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM monomers. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Blue: mean observed rate in h–1; standard error
of the mean (s.e.m.) in the last digit is shown in parentheses. Magenta:
pKa of the leaving group.Guided by these two empirical rules, we reasoned
that 2-aminoimidazole
(2-AI, 1j), which has a small substituent on the 2-position
and a higher pKa than 2-MI,[9] might serve as a better catalyst of primer extension
with 2-MeImpC. Indeed, 2-AI activated pG accelerated 2-MeImpC addition
by 7 times compared to its 2-MI activated counterpart. A plausible
explanation for the enhanced reactivity of 2-AI-activated pG is that
2-AI accelerates the formation of the 2-aminoimidazolium bridged dinucleotide
intermediate due to the greater nucleophilicity of its imidazole N3.
The larger 2-methylaminoimidazole leaving group (1k)
strongly reduced the rate despite its high pKa. Although the poor reactivity of 1k-activated
pG can be attributed in part to steric hindrance by the bulkier 2-methylamino
substituent, the magnitude of the effect is surprising and is the
subject of ongoing investigation.In addition to their superior
catalytic effect, monomers activated
by 2-AI are also better substrates at the +1 site than those activated
by 2-MI (Figure S1), an observation consistent
with their faster hydrolysis rates in a solution mimicking the primer-extension
condition (Figure S2). As a result, the
phosphoroimidazolide 1j-pG extends the primer far more
efficiently than 1a-pG on a template that encodes the
product sequence -GGGG-3′ (Figure ). This motivated us to try using 2-AI activated
monomers in both the upstream and downstream positions in primer extension
reactions. For various short templates, including those directing
the incorporation of A, U, and 2-thiouridine (s2U) monomers,
2-AI activated monomers react from 6 to 100 times faster than their
2-MI activated counterparts (Table ). The rate enhancement of s2U over U is
consistent with our previous studies using the 2-MI leaving group.[10] Collectively, these results establish that monomers
activated by 2-AI are superior substrates for nonenzymatic RNA primer
extension.
Figure 2
Efficient nonenzymatic RNA copying using phosphoroimidazolides
with 2-AI leaving group. The time course of primer extension reaction
using phosphoroimidazolides 1j-pG and 1a-pG were assayed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Positions
of primer and +1 to +4 products are indicated. Reaction conditions
as described in Figure .
Table 1
Reaction Rates of
Nonenzymatic Primer
Extension Measured by Primer Consumption
reaction
rates (h–1)a
product sequence
2-AI leaving
group
2-MI leaving
group
-CCC-3′
6.7 ± 0.1
1.11 ± 0.03
-GGG-3′
4.92 ± 0.09
0.61 ± 0.01
-CGG-3′
7.5 ± 0.1
0.31 ± 0.02
-GCC-3′
4.5 ± 0.2
0.090 ± 0.003
-AGG-3′
2.81 ± 0.03
0.026 ± 0.003
-UGG-3′
0.62 ± 0.01
n.d.b
-s2UGG-3′
1.4 ± 0.3
0.035 ± 0.002
Reaction conditions
as described
in Figure . Results
are given as the mean ± s.e.m. of triplicate experiments.
Too slow to be measured.
Efficient nonenzymatic RNA copying using phosphoroimidazolides
with 2-AI leaving group. The time course of primer extension reaction
using phosphoroimidazolides 1j-pG and 1a-pG were assayed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Positions
of primer and +1 to +4 products are indicated. Reaction conditions
as described in Figure .Reaction conditions
as described
in Figure . Results
are given as the mean ± s.e.m. of triplicate experiments.Too slow to be measured.Encouraged by the superior performance
of 2-AI activated monomers,
we next asked if these monomers can copy templates containing mixed
sequences with the assistance of downstream activated “helper”
trinucleotides (trimers).[7,11] To copy a template
that encodes the product sequence -UGAC-3′, four 2-AI activated
trimers (GAC, ACG, CGG, and GGU, where the underlined
nucleotides have a 5′-phosphoro-(2-aminoimidazole) moiety)
were mixed with 2-AI activated A, C, G, and s2U monomers.
The reaction time course (Figure a) revealed +1, + 2, and +3 extension intermediates,
indicating that most primers extended via addition of monomers rather
than ligation of trimers. After 1 day, 95% of the primer had been
converted to +4 products, some of which had then further reacted to
form +5 to +7 products.
Figure 3
Efficient one-pot extension of primers by four
nucleotides. (a)
Electrophoretogram of extension products after different reaction
times, as assayed by PAGE. Positions of primer and +1 to +7 products
are indicated. Reaction conditions: 1.2 μM primer (green), 1.5
μM template (cyan), 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM trimer (black), and 10 mM monomer (red). (b) Overlay of
extracted ion chromatograms of residual primer (P) and extension products
after 1 day (+1 to +7) observed by LC-MS. Observed ions for the peak
labeled +3* are consistent with a product having misincorporated s2U in place of A at the +3 position. Observed ions for the
peak +7† are consistent with either the correct
+7 product or an alternative double mutant product (see Table S1).
Efficient one-pot extension of primers by four
nucleotides. (a)
Electrophoretogram of extension products after different reaction
times, as assayed by PAGE. Positions of primer and +1 to +7 products
are indicated. Reaction conditions: 1.2 μM primer (green), 1.5
μM template (cyan), 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM trimer (black), and 10 mM monomer (red). (b) Overlay of
extracted ion chromatograms of residual primer (P) and extension products
after 1 day (+1 to +7) observed by LC-MS. Observed ions for the peak
labeled +3* are consistent with a product having misincorporated s2U in place of A at the +3 position. Observed ions for the
peak +7† are consistent with either the correct
+7 product or an alternative double mutant product (see Table S1).We confirmed the identities of the primer extension products
by
liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (Figure b). To enhance the chromatographic separation,
we used unlabeled primers, and templates that contained five-nucleotide
3′-overhangs. An exhaustive mass-based search revealed peaks
corresponding to the correct +1 to +7 products including a major peak
of the +4 full-length product and only one minor peak that is consistent
with a product having misincorporated s2U in place of A
at the +3 position, likely due to an s2U:U mismatch.[12] Our analysis did not reveal any misincorporated
+4 products, indicating that such a mismatch slows down further primer
extension[13] even in the presence of “helper”
trimers. In addition, we did not observe products containing misincorporations
caused by G-U wobble pairing, confirming that 2-thiolation effectively
suppresses G-U mismatch formation.[10]Compared with the 2-MI leaving group, the new 2-AI leaving group
significantly enhances the efficiency of trimer-assisted template
copying. Until now, an AA dinucleotide in the template has been a
significant roadblock for primer extension.[3,14] Even
with the assistance of trimers activated by 2-MI, the yield of +2
products is only 10% and 50% for U and s2U monomers, respectively.[7] With 2-AI as a leaving group, the yield increased
to 92% for U monomers (Figure a) and 98% for s2U monomers (Figure b), respectively. As such, the nonenzymatic
copying of an AA dinucleotide, a reaction long considered to be impossible
under normal reaction conditions, has now been achieved by combining
the 2-thiolation-induced preorganization of monomers in the reactive
C3′-endo conformation,[10,15] the catalytic effect of helper trimers,[7] and the superior reactivity of the 2-AI leaving group.
Figure 4
Efficient one-pot
nonenzymatic copying of various short RNA templates.
(a) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated U monomers
and trimers. (b) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated
s2U monomers and trimers. (c) Extending primers by UAGC
using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and U monomers and trimers. (d) Extending
primers by the sequence AUGAGGC using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and
U monomers and trimers. The extension products were assayed by PAGE.
Positions of primers and extended products are indicated. Reaction
conditions as described in Figure .
Efficient one-pot
nonenzymatic copying of various short RNA templates.
(a) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated U monomers
and trimers. (b) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated
s2U monomers and trimers. (c) Extending primers by UAGC
using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and U monomers and trimers. (d) Extending
primers by the sequence AUGAGGC using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and
U monomers and trimers. The extension products were assayed by PAGE.
Positions of primers and extended products are indicated. Reaction
conditions as described in Figure .To test the generality
of this method, we synthesized two additional
mixed-sequence templates containing AU and UA sequences that are also
considered to be challenging for nonenzymatic RNA copying.[3] Satisfyingly, both templates can be copied with
overall yields higher than 85% in just 1 day with unmodified A, C,
G, and U monomers (Figure c,d). The average single-nucleotide extension yield is 97–98%.
We are currently engaged in a systematic exploration of the sequence
space available to nonenzymatic RNA copying using the 2-AI leaving
group.The development of the 2-aminoimidazole leaving group
is a significant
advance in nonenzymatic RNA copying. 2-AI imparts higher reactivity
to phosphoroimidazolides, significantly increasing both the rate and
the yield of primer extension. The improvement in leaving-group reactivity
also synergizes with 2-thiolation of uridine and the use of catalytic
trimers, both of which are prebiotically plausible,[7,16] enabling
efficient nonenzymatic copying of various short RNA templates with
mixed sequences. Notably, 2-AI is also related to 2-aminooxazole,
a key intermediate in the prebiotic synthesis of the pyrimidine ribonucleotides.[17] Further optimization of the primer-extension
reaction may reveal a prebiotically plausible pathway to the efficient
copying of RNAs that are long enough to encode important biological
functions such as ribozyme activity.
Authors: Kevin Leu; Eric Kervio; Benedikt Obermayer; Rebecca M Turk-MacLeod; Caterina Yuan; Jesus-Mario Luevano; Eric Chen; Ulrich Gerland; Clemens Richert; Irene A Chen Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Benjamin D Heuberger; Ayan Pal; Francesca Del Frate; Ved V Topkar; Jack W Szostak Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jianfeng Xu; Václav Chmela; Nicholas J Green; David A Russell; Mikołaj J Janicki; Robert W Góra; Rafał Szabla; Andrew D Bond; John D Sutherland Journal: Nature Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ruiqin Yi; Quoc Phuong Tran; Sarfaraz Ali; Isao Yoda; Zachary R Adam; H James Cleaves; Albert C Fahrenbach Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wen Zhang; Chun Pong Tam; Travis Walton; Albert C Fahrenbach; Gabriel Birrane; Jack W Szostak Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Constantin Giurgiu; Ziyuan Fang; Harry R M Aitken; Seohyun Chris Kim; Lydia Pazienza; Shriyaa Mittal; Jack W Szostak Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 16.823