Literature DB >> 28117989

Enhanced Nonenzymatic RNA Copying with 2-Aminoimidazole Activated Nucleotides.

Li Li1, Noam Prywes1, Chun Pong Tam1, Derek K O'Flaherty1, Victor S Lelyveld1, Enver Cagri Izgu1, Ayan Pal1, Jack W Szostak1.   

Abstract

Achieving efficient nonenzymatic replication of RNA is an important step toward the synthesis of self-replicating protocells that may mimic early forms of life. Despite recent progress, the nonenzymatic copying of templates containing mixed sequences remains slow and inefficient. Here we demonstrate that activating nucleotides with 2-aminoimidazole results in superior reaction kinetics and improved yields of primer extension reaction products. This new leaving group significantly accelerates monomer addition as well as trimer-assisted RNA primer extension, allowing efficient copying of a variety of short RNA templates with mixed sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28117989      PMCID: PMC6326525          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b13148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Replication of the genetic information is a key chemical process in living organisms. Whereas modern cells copy their genomes using sophisticated protein enzymes, primordial cells had to rely on primitive mechanisms without access to an elaborate translation system. One such mechanism is nonenzymatic RNA replication,[1] in which chemically activated nucleotides, such as phosphoroimidazolides, spontaneously polymerize when guided by a template sequence. Its simplicity has made it an attractive approach in laboratory attempts to develop self-replicating protocells that mimic early forms of life.[2] However, a major limitation of this approach is its poor yield and slow rate, particularly when copying templates with mixed sequences.[3] Here we report the development of a superior leaving group, 2-aminoimidazole, which enables efficient copying of short RNA templates with mixed sequences. Since the discovery in 1981 that 2-methylimidazole (2-MI) activated nucleotides show both good reactivity and the ability to direct the formation of natural 3′-5′ linkages, 2-MI has been the most widely used leaving group for studies of nonenzymatic RNA template copying by primer extension.[4] Interestingly, 2-MI activated monomers are more reactive in primer extension than the corresponding imidazole and 4-methylimidazole derivatives,[4] both of which contain better leaving groups than 2-MI as judged by their hydrolysis rates.[5] The higher reactivity of 2-MI activated nucleotides has been attributed to an interaction between leaving groups of neighboring monomers, such that the leaving group on the downstream nucleotide exhibits a catalytic effect that increases the rate of reaction between the upstream nucleotide and the adjacent primer.[6] This leaving-group interaction accelerates the primer extension reaction by 10–100 times, depending on whether the downstream nucleotide is an activated monomer[6] or an activated oligonucleotide.[7] We have recently suggested that the physical origin of this rate enhancement is due to the covalent reaction of 2-MI-activated monomers with each other to form imidazolium bridged dinucleotides, which are highly reactive intermediates in the copying of RNA templates by primer extension.[8] In an effort parallel to the above mechanistic investigations,[5−8] we sought to develop a leaving group with enhanced catalytic activity when used to activate nucleotides in positions downstream of the reaction site from a screen of leaving groups. We measured primer extension rates on a template that encodes the product sequence -CGGG-3′. Reaction mixtures contained C monomers activated by 2-MI (2-MeImpC), which could only bind the initial +1 position, and G monomers activated by various leaving groups, which could only bind downstream (1a–1h, Figure ). The results revealed two general trends. First, a larger substituent at the 2-position slows down the reaction (1a–1d). Second, the reaction rate decreases as the pKa of the leaving group decreases (1a, 1e–1h). Replacing 2-MI on the downstream G monomers by 2-methylpyrrole (1i) abolishes the catalytic effect, indicating that neither pi-stacking between neighboring leaving groups, nor the NH moiety alone, which may serve as a hydrogen-bond donor, are sufficient to catalyze primer extension; the lack of a catalytic effect is consistent with primer extension proceeding through an imidazolium-bridged intermediate.
Figure 1

Development of 2-aminoimidazole as a superior leaving group for nonenzymatic primer extension. Top row: the template (cyan)-dependent reaction of 2-MI activated C monomers (red) with the primer (green) was used to probe the effect of adjacent leaving groups (LG, black) on the reaction rate. Curved arrow indicates the site of reaction. Varying the leaving group (1a–1k) influenced the rates by up to 200 times, with 2-aminoimidazole (1j) giving the fastest rate. Reaction conditions: 1.5 μM primer, 5 μM template, 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM monomers. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Blue: mean observed rate in h–1; standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) in the last digit is shown in parentheses. Magenta: pKa of the leaving group.

Development of 2-aminoimidazole as a superior leaving group for nonenzymatic primer extension. Top row: the template (cyan)-dependent reaction of 2-MI activated C monomers (red) with the primer (green) was used to probe the effect of adjacent leaving groups (LG, black) on the reaction rate. Curved arrow indicates the site of reaction. Varying the leaving group (1a–1k) influenced the rates by up to 200 times, with 2-aminoimidazole (1j) giving the fastest rate. Reaction conditions: 1.5 μM primer, 5 μM template, 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM monomers. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Blue: mean observed rate in h–1; standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) in the last digit is shown in parentheses. Magenta: pKa of the leaving group. Guided by these two empirical rules, we reasoned that 2-aminoimidazole (2-AI, 1j), which has a small substituent on the 2-position and a higher pKa than 2-MI,[9] might serve as a better catalyst of primer extension with 2-MeImpC. Indeed, 2-AI activated pG accelerated 2-MeImpC addition by 7 times compared to its 2-MI activated counterpart. A plausible explanation for the enhanced reactivity of 2-AI-activated pG is that 2-AI accelerates the formation of the 2-aminoimidazolium bridged dinucleotide intermediate due to the greater nucleophilicity of its imidazole N3. The larger 2-methylaminoimidazole leaving group (1k) strongly reduced the rate despite its high pKa. Although the poor reactivity of 1k-activated pG can be attributed in part to steric hindrance by the bulkier 2-methylamino substituent, the magnitude of the effect is surprising and is the subject of ongoing investigation. In addition to their superior catalytic effect, monomers activated by 2-AI are also better substrates at the +1 site than those activated by 2-MI (Figure S1), an observation consistent with their faster hydrolysis rates in a solution mimicking the primer-extension condition (Figure S2). As a result, the phosphoroimidazolide 1j-pG extends the primer far more efficiently than 1a-pG on a template that encodes the product sequence -GGGG-3′ (Figure ). This motivated us to try using 2-AI activated monomers in both the upstream and downstream positions in primer extension reactions. For various short templates, including those directing the incorporation of A, U, and 2-thiouridine (s2U) monomers, 2-AI activated monomers react from 6 to 100 times faster than their 2-MI activated counterparts (Table ). The rate enhancement of s2U over U is consistent with our previous studies using the 2-MI leaving group.[10] Collectively, these results establish that monomers activated by 2-AI are superior substrates for nonenzymatic RNA primer extension.
Figure 2

Efficient nonenzymatic RNA copying using phosphoroimidazolides with 2-AI leaving group. The time course of primer extension reaction using phosphoroimidazolides 1j-pG and 1a-pG were assayed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Positions of primer and +1 to +4 products are indicated. Reaction conditions as described in Figure .

Table 1

Reaction Rates of Nonenzymatic Primer Extension Measured by Primer Consumption

 reaction rates (h–1)a
product sequence2-AI leaving group2-MI leaving group
-CCC-3′6.7 ± 0.11.11 ± 0.03
-GGG-3′4.92 ± 0.090.61 ± 0.01
-CGG-3′7.5 ± 0.10.31 ± 0.02
-GCC-3′4.5 ± 0.20.090 ± 0.003
-AGG-3′2.81 ± 0.030.026 ± 0.003
-UGG-3′0.62 ± 0.01n.d.b
-s2UGG-3′1.4 ± 0.30.035 ± 0.002

Reaction conditions as described in Figure . Results are given as the mean ± s.e.m. of triplicate experiments.

Too slow to be measured.

Efficient nonenzymatic RNA copying using phosphoroimidazolides with 2-AI leaving group. The time course of primer extension reaction using phosphoroimidazolides 1j-pG and 1a-pG were assayed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Positions of primer and +1 to +4 products are indicated. Reaction conditions as described in Figure . Reaction conditions as described in Figure . Results are given as the mean ± s.e.m. of triplicate experiments. Too slow to be measured. Encouraged by the superior performance of 2-AI activated monomers, we next asked if these monomers can copy templates containing mixed sequences with the assistance of downstream activated “helper” trinucleotides (trimers).[7,11] To copy a template that encodes the product sequence -UGAC-3′, four 2-AI activated trimers (GAC, ACG, CGG, and GGU, where the underlined nucleotides have a 5′-phosphoro-(2-aminoimidazole) moiety) were mixed with 2-AI activated A, C, G, and s2U monomers. The reaction time course (Figure a) revealed +1, + 2, and +3 extension intermediates, indicating that most primers extended via addition of monomers rather than ligation of trimers. After 1 day, 95% of the primer had been converted to +4 products, some of which had then further reacted to form +5 to +7 products.
Figure 3

Efficient one-pot extension of primers by four nucleotides. (a) Electrophoretogram of extension products after different reaction times, as assayed by PAGE. Positions of primer and +1 to +7 products are indicated. Reaction conditions: 1.2 μM primer (green), 1.5 μM template (cyan), 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM trimer (black), and 10 mM monomer (red). (b) Overlay of extracted ion chromatograms of residual primer (P) and extension products after 1 day (+1 to +7) observed by LC-MS. Observed ions for the peak labeled +3* are consistent with a product having misincorporated s2U in place of A at the +3 position. Observed ions for the peak +7† are consistent with either the correct +7 product or an alternative double mutant product (see Table S1).

Efficient one-pot extension of primers by four nucleotides. (a) Electrophoretogram of extension products after different reaction times, as assayed by PAGE. Positions of primer and +1 to +7 products are indicated. Reaction conditions: 1.2 μM primer (green), 1.5 μM template (cyan), 200 mM HEPES pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM trimer (black), and 10 mM monomer (red). (b) Overlay of extracted ion chromatograms of residual primer (P) and extension products after 1 day (+1 to +7) observed by LC-MS. Observed ions for the peak labeled +3* are consistent with a product having misincorporated s2U in place of A at the +3 position. Observed ions for the peak +7† are consistent with either the correct +7 product or an alternative double mutant product (see Table S1). We confirmed the identities of the primer extension products by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (Figure b). To enhance the chromatographic separation, we used unlabeled primers, and templates that contained five-nucleotide 3′-overhangs. An exhaustive mass-based search revealed peaks corresponding to the correct +1 to +7 products including a major peak of the +4 full-length product and only one minor peak that is consistent with a product having misincorporated s2U in place of A at the +3 position, likely due to an s2U:U mismatch.[12] Our analysis did not reveal any misincorporated +4 products, indicating that such a mismatch slows down further primer extension[13] even in the presence of “helper” trimers. In addition, we did not observe products containing misincorporations caused by G-U wobble pairing, confirming that 2-thiolation effectively suppresses G-U mismatch formation.[10] Compared with the 2-MI leaving group, the new 2-AI leaving group significantly enhances the efficiency of trimer-assisted template copying. Until now, an AA dinucleotide in the template has been a significant roadblock for primer extension.[3,14] Even with the assistance of trimers activated by 2-MI, the yield of +2 products is only 10% and 50% for U and s2U monomers, respectively.[7] With 2-AI as a leaving group, the yield increased to 92% for U monomers (Figure a) and 98% for s2U monomers (Figure b), respectively. As such, the nonenzymatic copying of an AA dinucleotide, a reaction long considered to be impossible under normal reaction conditions, has now been achieved by combining the 2-thiolation-induced preorganization of monomers in the reactive C3′-endo conformation,[10,15] the catalytic effect of helper trimers,[7] and the superior reactivity of the 2-AI leaving group.
Figure 4

Efficient one-pot nonenzymatic copying of various short RNA templates. (a) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated U monomers and trimers. (b) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated s2U monomers and trimers. (c) Extending primers by UAGC using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and U monomers and trimers. (d) Extending primers by the sequence AUGAGGC using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and U monomers and trimers. The extension products were assayed by PAGE. Positions of primers and extended products are indicated. Reaction conditions as described in Figure .

Efficient one-pot nonenzymatic copying of various short RNA templates. (a) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated U monomers and trimers. (b) Copying AA dinucleotide templates using 2-AI activated s2U monomers and trimers. (c) Extending primers by UAGC using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and U monomers and trimers. (d) Extending primers by the sequence AUGAGGC using 2-AI activated A, C, G, and U monomers and trimers. The extension products were assayed by PAGE. Positions of primers and extended products are indicated. Reaction conditions as described in Figure . To test the generality of this method, we synthesized two additional mixed-sequence templates containing AU and UA sequences that are also considered to be challenging for nonenzymatic RNA copying.[3] Satisfyingly, both templates can be copied with overall yields higher than 85% in just 1 day with unmodified A, C, G, and U monomers (Figure c,d). The average single-nucleotide extension yield is 97–98%. We are currently engaged in a systematic exploration of the sequence space available to nonenzymatic RNA copying using the 2-AI leaving group. The development of the 2-aminoimidazole leaving group is a significant advance in nonenzymatic RNA copying. 2-AI imparts higher reactivity to phosphoroimidazolides, significantly increasing both the rate and the yield of primer extension. The improvement in leaving-group reactivity also synergizes with 2-thiolation of uridine and the use of catalytic trimers, both of which are prebiotically plausible,[7,16] enabling efficient nonenzymatic copying of various short RNA templates with mixed sequences. Notably, 2-AI is also related to 2-aminooxazole, a key intermediate in the prebiotic synthesis of the pyrimidine ribonucleotides.[17] Further optimization of the primer-extension reaction may reveal a prebiotically plausible pathway to the efficient copying of RNAs that are long enough to encode important biological functions such as ribozyme activity.
  15 in total

1.  Nonenzymatic template-directed synthesis on hairpin oligonucleotides. 3. Incorporation of adenosine and uridine residues.

Authors:  T Wu; L E Orgel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1992-10-07       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Efficient enzyme-free copying of all four nucleobases templated by immobilized RNA.

Authors:  Christopher Deck; Mario Jauker; Clemens Richert
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 3.  Progress toward synthetic cells.

Authors:  J Craig Blain; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Nonenzymatic template-directed synthesis on hairpin oligonucleotides. 2. Templates containing cytidine and guanosine residues.

Authors:  T Wu; L E Orgel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Cascade of reduced speed and accuracy after errors in enzyme-free copying of nucleic acid sequences.

Authors:  Kevin Leu; Eric Kervio; Benedikt Obermayer; Rebecca M Turk-MacLeod; Caterina Yuan; Jesus-Mario Luevano; Eric Chen; Ulrich Gerland; Clemens Richert; Irene A Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Synthesis of activated pyrimidine ribonucleotides in prebiotically plausible conditions.

Authors:  Matthew W Powner; Béatrice Gerland; John D Sutherland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Activated ribonucleotides undergo a sugar pucker switch upon binding to a single-stranded RNA template.

Authors:  Na Zhang; Shenglong Zhang; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Sliding over the blocks in enzyme-free RNA copying--one-pot primer extension in ice.

Authors:  Philipp M G Löffler; Joost Groen; Mark Dörr; Pierre-Alain Monnard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Crystal structure studies of RNA duplexes containing s(2)U:A and s(2)U:U base pairs.

Authors:  Jia Sheng; Aaron Larsen; Benjamin D Heuberger; J Craig Blain; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Replacing uridine with 2-thiouridine enhances the rate and fidelity of nonenzymatic RNA primer extension.

Authors:  Benjamin D Heuberger; Ayan Pal; Francesca Del Frate; Ved V Topkar; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Protocells and RNA Self-Replication.

Authors:  Gerald F Joyce; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Selective prebiotic formation of RNA pyrimidine and DNA purine nucleosides.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Václav Chmela; Nicholas J Green; David A Russell; Mikołaj J Janicki; Robert W Góra; Rafał Szabla; Andrew D Bond; John D Sutherland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Prebiotic synthesis and triphosphorylation of 3'-amino-TNA nucleosides.

Authors:  Daniel Whitaker; Matthew W Powner
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 24.274

4.  A continuous reaction network that produces RNA precursors.

Authors:  Ruiqin Yi; Quoc Phuong Tran; Sarfaraz Ali; Isao Yoda; Zachary R Adam; H James Cleaves; Albert C Fahrenbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Insight into the mechanism of nonenzymatic RNA primer extension from the structure of an RNA-GpppG complex.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Chun Pong Tam; Travis Walton; Albert C Fahrenbach; Gabriel Birrane; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prebiotic phosphorylation of 2-thiouridine provides either nucleotides or DNA building blocks via photoreduction.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Nicholas J Green; Clémentine Gibard; Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy; John D Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 24.427

7.  A Fluorescent G-Quadruplex Sensor for Chemical RNA Copying.

Authors:  Constantin Giurgiu; Tom H Wright; Derek K O'Flaherty; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Deep sequencing of non-enzymatic RNA primer extension.

Authors:  Daniel Duzdevich; Christopher E Carr; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Nonenzymatic RNA-templated Synthesis of N3'→P5' Phosphoramidate DNA.

Authors:  Derek K O'Flaherty; Lijun Zhou; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2020-09-05

10.  Structure-Activity Relationships in Nonenzymatic Template-Directed RNA Synthesis.

Authors:  Constantin Giurgiu; Ziyuan Fang; Harry R M Aitken; Seohyun Chris Kim; Lydia Pazienza; Shriyaa Mittal; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 16.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.