Literature DB >> 28112418

Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels.

Muhammad Shafiq-Ul-Hassan1,2, Geoffrey G Zhang1,2, Kujtim Latifi1,2, Ghanim Ullah1, Dylan C Hunt2, Yoganand Balagurunathan2, Mahmoud Abrahem Abdalah2, Matthew B Schabath2, Dmitry G Goldgof3, Dennis Mackin4, Laurence Edward Court4, Robert James Gillies2, Eduardo Gerardo Moros1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many radiomics features were originally developed for non-medical imaging applications and therefore original assumptions may need to be reexamined. In this study, we investigated the impact of slice thickness and pixel spacing (or pixel size) on radiomics features extracted from Computed Tomography (CT) phantom images acquired with different scanners as well as different acquisition and reconstruction parameters. The dependence of CT texture features on gray-level discretization was also evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A texture phantom composed of 10 different cartridges of different materials was scanned on eight different CT scanners from three different manufacturers. The images were reconstructed for various slice thicknesses. For each slice thickness, the reconstruction Field Of View (FOV) was varied to render pixel sizes ranging from 0.39 to 0.98 mm. A fixed spherical region of interest (ROI) was contoured on the images of the shredded rubber cartridge and the 3D printed, 20% fill, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene plastic cartridge (ABS20) for all phantom imaging sets. Radiomic features were extracted from the ROIs using an in-house program. Features categories were: shape (10), intensity (16), GLCM (24), GLZSM (11), GLRLM (11), and NGTDM (5), fractal dimensions (8) and first-order wavelets (128), for a total of 213 features. Voxel-size resampling was performed to investigate the usefulness of extracting features using a suitably chosen voxel size. Acquired phantom image sets were resampled to a voxel size of 1 × 1 × 2 mm3 using linear interpolation. Image features were therefore extracted from resampled and original datasets and the absolute value of the percent coefficient of variation (%COV) for each feature was calculated. Based on the %COV values, features were classified in 3 groups: (1) features with large variations before and after resampling (%COV >50); (2) features with diminished variation (%COV <30) after resampling; and (3) features that had originally moderate variation (%COV <50%) and were negligibly affected by resampling. Group 2 features were further studied by modifying feature definitions to include voxel size. Original and voxel-size normalized features were used for interscanner comparisons. A subsequent analysis investigated feature dependency on gray-level discretization by extracting 51 texture features from ROIs from each of the 10 different phantom cartridges using 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 gray levels.
RESULTS: Out of the 213 features extracted, 150 were reproducible across voxel sizes, 42 improved significantly (%COV <30, Group 2) after resampling, and 21 had large variations before and after resampling (Group 1). Ten features improved significantly after definition modification effectively removed their voxel-size dependency. Interscanner comparison indicated that feature variability among scanners nearly vanished for 8 of these 10 features. Furthermore, 17 out of 51 texture features were found to be dependent on the number of gray levels. These features were redefined to include the number of gray levels which greatly reduced this dependency.
CONCLUSION: Voxel-size resampling is an appropriate pre-processing step for image datasets acquired with variable voxel sizes to obtain more reproducible CT features. We found that some of the radiomics features were voxel size and gray-level discretization-dependent. The introduction of normalizing factors in their definitions greatly reduced or removed these dependencies.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; features; gray levels; phantom; radiomics; texture; voxel size

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28112418      PMCID: PMC5462462          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  On some misconceptions about tumor heterogeneity quantification.

Authors:  Frank J Brooks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Exploring Variability in CT Characterization of Tumors: A Preliminary Phantom Study.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Yongqiang Tan; Wei Yann Tsai; Lawrence H Schwartz; Lin Lu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

3.  Are pretreatment 18F-FDG PET tumor textural features in non-small cell lung cancer associated with response and survival after chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Gary J R Cook; Connie Yip; Muhammad Siddique; Vicky Goh; Sugama Chicklore; Arunabha Roy; Paul Marsden; Shahreen Ahmad; David Landau
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Applications and limitations of radiomics.

Authors:  Stephen S F Yip; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Can radiomics features be reproducibly measured from CBCT images for patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Xenia Fave; Dennis Mackin; Jinzhong Yang; Joy Zhang; David Fried; Peter Balter; David Followill; Daniel Gomez; A Kyle Jones; Francesco Stingo; Jonas Fontenot; Laurence Court
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Coregistered FDG PET/CT-based textural characterization of head and neck cancer for radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  Huan Yu; Curtis Caldwell; Katherine Mah; Daniel Mozeg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Radiogenomic analysis to identify imaging phenotypes associated with drug response gene expression programs in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael D Kuo; Jeremy Gollub; Claude B Sirlin; Clara Ooi; Xin Chen
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Kenneth A Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Variability of Image Features Computed from Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jasmine A Oliver; Mikalai Budzevich; Geoffrey G Zhang; Thomas J Dilling; Kujtim Latifi; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.

Authors:  Ralph T H Leijenaar; Georgi Nalbantov; Sara Carvalho; Wouter J C van Elmpt; Esther G C Troost; Ronald Boellaard; Hugo J W L Aerts; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  165 in total

1.  CT-based Radiomic Signatures for Predicting Histopathologic Features in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Pritam Mukherjee; Murilo Cintra; Chao Huang; Mu Zhou; Shankuan Zhu; A Dimitrios Colevas; Nancy Fischbein; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15

2.  Predicting response to somatostatin analogues in acromegaly: machine learning-based high-dimensional quantitative texture analysis on T2-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Emine Sebnem Durmaz; Pinar Kadioglu; Ozge Polat Korkmaz; Nil Comunoglu; Necmettin Tanriover; Naci Kocer; Civan Islak; Osman Kizilkilic
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.

Authors:  Kayla Robinson; Hui Li; Li Lan; David Schacht; Maryellen Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Matching and Homogenizing Convolution Kernels for Quantitative Studies in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Rachel Ger; Skylar Gay; Cristina Dodge; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Aaron Kyle Jones; Laurence Court
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Influence of segmentation margin on machine learning-based high-dimensional quantitative CT texture analysis: a reproducibility study on renal clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates; Emine Sebnem Durmaz; Melis Baykara Ulusan; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Design and fabrication of heterogeneous lung nodule phantoms for assessing the accuracy and variability of measured texture radiomics features in CT.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Jocelyn Hoye; Yuese Zheng; Justin B Solomon; Daniele Marin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-21

7.  Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis.

Authors:  Alex Zwanenburg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Systematic analysis of bias and variability of texture measurements in computed tomography.

Authors:  Marthony Robins; Justin Solomon; Jocelyn Hoye; Ehsan Abadi; Daniele Marin; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 9.  Potentials of radiomics for cancer diagnosis and treatment in comparison with computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Hidetaka Arimura; Mazen Soufi; Kenta Ninomiya; Hidemi Kamezawa; Masahiro Yamada
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-10-29

10.  Liver shape analysis using partial least squares regression-based statistical shape model: application for understanding and staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Mazen Soufi; Yoshito Otake; Masatoshi Hori; Kazuya Moriguchi; Yasuharu Imai; Yoshiyuki Sawai; Takashi Ota; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.