Cells are highly advanced microreactors that form the basis of all life. Their fascinating complexity has inspired scientists to create analogs from synthetic and natural components using a bottom-up approach. The ultimate goal here is to assemble a fully man-made cell that displays functionality and adaptivity as advanced as that found in nature, which will not only provide insight into the fundamental processes in natural cells but also pave the way for new applications of such artificial cells. In this Account, we highlight our recent work and that of others on the construction of artificial cells. First, we will introduce the key features that characterize a living system; next, we will discuss how these have been imitated in artificial cells. First, compartmentalization is crucial to separate the inner chemical milieu from the external environment. Current state-of-the-art artificial cells comprise subcompartments to mimic the hierarchical architecture of eukaryotic cells and tissue. Furthermore, synthetic gene circuits have been used to encode genetic information that creates complex behavior like pulses or feedback. Additionally, artificial cells have to reproduce to maintain a population. Controlled growth and fission of synthetic compartments have been demonstrated, but the extensive regulation of cell division in nature is still unmatched. Here, we also point out important challenges the field needs to overcome to realize its full potential. As artificial cells integrate increasing orders of functionality, maintaining a supporting metabolism that can regenerate key metabolites becomes crucial. Furthermore, life does not operate in isolation. Natural cells constantly sense their environment, exchange (chemical) signals, and can move toward a chemoattractant. Here, we specifically explore recent efforts to reproduce such adaptivity in artificial cells. For instance, synthetic compartments have been produced that can recruit proteins to the membrane upon an external stimulus or modulate their membrane composition and permeability to control their interaction with the environment. A next step would be the communication of artificial cells with either bacteria or another artificial cell. Indeed, examples of such primitive chemical signaling are presented. Finally, motility is important for many organisms and has, therefore, also been pursued in synthetic systems. Synthetic compartments that were designed to move in a directed, controlled manner have been assembled, and directed movement toward a chemical attractant is among one of the most life-like directions currently under research. Although the bottom-up construction of an artificial cell that can be truly considered "alive" is still an ambitious goal, the recent work discussed in this Account shows that this is an active field with contributions from diverse disciplines like materials chemistry and biochemistry. Notably, research during the past decade has already provided valuable insights into complex synthetic systems with life-like properties. In the future, artificial cells are thought to contribute to an increased understanding of processes in natural cells and provide opportunities to create smart, autonomous, cell-like materials.
Cells are highly advanced microreactors that form the basis of all life. Their fascinating complexity has inspired scientists to create analogs from synthetic and natural components using a bottom-up approach. The ultimate goal here is to assemble a fully man-made cell that displays functionality and adaptivity as advanced as that found in nature, which will not only provide insight into the fundamental processes in natural cells but also pave the way for new applications of such artificial cells. In this Account, we highlight our recent work and that of others on the construction of artificial cells. First, we will introduce the key features that characterize a living system; next, we will discuss how these have been imitated in artificial cells. First, compartmentalization is crucial to separate the inner chemical milieu from the external environment. Current state-of-the-art artificial cells comprise subcompartments to mimic the hierarchical architecture of eukaryotic cells and tissue. Furthermore, synthetic gene circuits have been used to encode genetic information that creates complex behavior like pulses or feedback. Additionally, artificial cells have to reproduce to maintain a population. Controlled growth and fission of synthetic compartments have been demonstrated, but the extensive regulation of cell division in nature is still unmatched. Here, we also point out important challenges the field needs to overcome to realize its full potential. As artificial cells integrate increasing orders of functionality, maintaining a supporting metabolism that can regenerate key metabolites becomes crucial. Furthermore, life does not operate in isolation. Natural cells constantly sense their environment, exchange (chemical) signals, and can move toward a chemoattractant. Here, we specifically explore recent efforts to reproduce such adaptivity in artificial cells. For instance, synthetic compartments have been produced that can recruit proteins to the membrane upon an external stimulus or modulate their membrane composition and permeability to control their interaction with the environment. A next step would be the communication of artificial cells with either bacteria or another artificial cell. Indeed, examples of such primitive chemical signaling are presented. Finally, motility is important for many organisms and has, therefore, also been pursued in synthetic systems. Synthetic compartments that were designed to move in a directed, controlled manner have been assembled, and directed movement toward a chemical attractant is among one of the most life-like directions currently under research. Although the bottom-up construction of an artificial cell that can be truly considered "alive" is still an ambitious goal, the recent work discussed in this Account shows that this is an active field with contributions from diverse disciplines like materials chemistry and biochemistry. Notably, research during the past decade has already provided valuable insights into complex synthetic systems with life-like properties. In the future, artificial cells are thought to contribute to an increased understanding of processes in natural cells and provide opportunities to create smart, autonomous, cell-like materials.
Cells are regarded as the basic building
blocks of life. The smallest
entity generally considered to be living is a single cell, and all
life forms are either uni- or multicellular organisms. Contemporary
cells are a product of nature’s evolutionary sculpting. As
such, they are highly complex and efficient microreactors, which have
inspired scientists to construct synthetic equivalents.Currently,
we have a fair understanding of many processes that
take place in a natural cell. The structure and function of individual
components and even entire biochemical pathways have been elucidated.
The interplay between all these factors, however, puts the complexity
of a natural cell largely beyond the grasp of contemporary science.
The field of synthetic biology tries to take the next step in understanding
the integration of all these processes by creating a minimal cell
either by genome-editing of a natural organism (top-down approach)
or by constructing from individual building blocks a structure that
mimics the essential aspects of a natural cell (bottom-up approach).[1] The philosophy behind the bottom-up approach,
which we will limit ourselves to in this Account, is that scientists
can only truly understand a natural cell if they can make one from
scratch.Yet to make a living artificial cell, one first has
to consider
what the minimal criteria for life are. The chemoton model, developed
by Tibor Gánti, is often used to describe minimal life.[2] According to his model, an entity comprising
(i) a chemical boundary system, (ii) a chemical information system,
and (iii) a self-reproducing chemical motor (metabolism) can be considered
“alive”. Additionally, (iv) growth and reproduction
are needed for survival of the species. Finally, (v) adaptivity is
paramount for life’s survival in a dynamic environment.Integrating these characteristics in a single synthetic system
is an ambitious yet daunting goal. In recent years, however, several
groups have successfully recreated simplified characteristics of life
in synthetic systems, in particular employing nano- or micrometer-sized
self-assembled compartments that can encapsulate a wide variety of
(macro)molecules.[3,4] Such systems are usually termed
artificial cells or semisynthetic minimal cells.Here, we will
discuss the design, assembly, and behavior of artificial
cells with emphasis on strategies that integrate life-like characteristics
and display complex and adaptive behavior. The five criteria of life
defined above will be used to guide our discussion. We have limited
ourselves to membrane-bound compartments; structures like water-in-oil
droplets[5] and coacervates[6] are beyond the scope of this Account. Rather than being
comprehensive, we aim to highlight the current state of the art, illustrate
it with select examples, and discuss the direction in which this field
is heading.
Synthetic Compartments
All living systems necessitate
a semipermeable boundary to sustain
life in a changing environment. Primarily, its permeability should
be finely tuned to retain vital components while exchanging nutrients
and waste with the environment. A natural cell carefully controls
these processes using a semipermeable lipid membrane that contains
channels, receptors, and carrier ionophores, among others. Over the
years, a wide variety of synthetic compartments have been developed
that also allow control over the permeability of their shell. Design
factors that influence permeability include the chemical nature of
the membrane building blocks, membrane thickness, the presence of
pores and channels, and domain formation in heterogeneous membranes.[3] Today, there are several established procedures
for creating nano- and microcompartments that can facilitate reactions
while exchanging reagents and products with the environment. These
include lipid and polymeric vesicles (liposomes and polymersomes),
hybrids of these, virus capsids, colloidosomes, and coacervates.[3]While our control over the permeability,
size, stimuli-responsiveness,
and biodegradability of these compartments has greatly improved in
recent years, they are still fairly basic mimics of the architecture
of natural cells. Especially eukaryotic cells are characterized by
an elaborate internal structure through which processes are separated
via intracellular membranes. Recently, some designs have incorporated
multiple compartments to mimic such natural structures.
Multicompartmentalized
Vesicles
Prominent classes of
multicompartmentalized systems that have been developed include liposomes
within layer-by-layer capsules (capsosomes), liposome-in-liposome
(vesosomes), and polymersome-in-polymersome architectures, and multisomes
(Figure ). Such structures
have been extensively reviewed elsewhere;[3,11] here
we limit ourselves to highlighting some recently developed life-like
geometries.
Figure 1
Prominent classes of multicompartmentalized vesicles. Their design
is often inspired by the architecture of a eukaryotic cell (middle).
Adapted with permission from refs (7−10). Copyrights 2009 and 2014 Wiley, 2013 American Association for the
Advancement of Science, and 2010 American Chemical Society.
Prominent classes of multicompartmentalized vesicles. Their design
is often inspired by the architecture of a eukaryotic cell (middle).
Adapted with permission from refs (7−10). Copyrights 2009 and 2014 Wiley, 2013 American Association for the
Advancement of Science, and 2010 American Chemical Society.We and our collaborators have
reported a multicompartmentalized
vesicle whose architecture resembles a eukaryotic cell, as it contains
organelles to create different chemical environments. In our system,
the successive enzymes of an enzymatic cascade reaction were encapsulated
in different polymeric nanoreactors within a large polymersome. The
semipermeable nature of the nanoreactors facilitated the diffusion
of reagents and products, while restricting the enzymes to their respective
subcompartments. This design not only localized the successive reactions
to specialized compartments, but also successfully separated incompatible
enzymes into different subcompartments. Consequently, the cascade
proceeded more efficiently in the multicompartmentalized vesicle than
in bulk.[8]Large networks of tightly
connected aqueous compartments can be
fabricated using the multisome-approach developed by Bayley’s
group.[12] These networks are formed when
multiple lipid monolayer-covered water-in-oil droplets make contact
and form droplet interface bilayers (DIBs). Recently, this approach
was used to isolate enzymatic reactions in different compartments.
Each enzymatic reaction produced the substrate for the following metabolic
step in an adjacent compartment.[13] Rather
than mimicking the cellular architecture as closely as the above-described
vesicle-in-vesicle approach, these multicompartment vesicle networks
may provide a new tool to make tissue-like soft matter, although the
number of bilayers separating these synthetic cells is in fact one
too few. Nevertheless, impressive 3D networks of multisomes with defined
geometries and conductivity have been created.[9]There are subcompartments that are membraneless, both in nature
and in synthetic systems. Macromolecular crowding in the cytosol leads
to aqueous phase separation, which has been shown to play an important
role in biological processes.[5] Keating
and co-workers created phase-separated subcompartments by encapsulating
a dextran/poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) aqueous two-phase system in
a liposome. The resulting liposome contained two distinct aqueous
compartments to which various macromolecules selectively partitioned.[14] Such systems hold promise for the dynamic localization
of macromolecules to distinct compartments of a synthetic cell, which
can be used to study the effects of macromolecular crowding on essential
biological functions.For the next step in life-like multicompartmentalized
vesicles,
better control over the number, positioning, and membrane permeability
of subcompartments is needed. Although for capsosomes the deposition
of subcompartments is highly controllable, the current formation procedures
for vesicle-in-vesicle reactors usually prohibit such control. Moreover,
membrane transporters enable natural organelles to specifically uptake
or excrete certain classes of molecules. Such discrimination is unreachable
using current lipid or polymeric building blocks. Facile incorporation
of selective membrane channels into synthetic vesicles would permit
more diversified subcompartments with specific functions like natural
organelles.
Genetically Programming Artificial Cells
Life requires not only some type of chemical boundary but also
a chemical information system. Since all life forms use DNA to store
information, it is also the information carrier of choice to construct
a minimal cell. Yet, even the simplest organism contains hundreds
of carefully regulated genes. Although regulation of synthetic networks
of that size is yet unattainable, simpler synthetic gene circuits
(SGCs) can already display complex behavior from temporal expression
patterns generated by combining genetic modules. Such SGCs have been
incorporated into living cells as well as in cell-free transcription–translation
(TX-TL) extracts,[15] but their implementation
in cell-like compartments has been limited.In 2004, the production
of functional proteins using TX-TL extracts
inside vesicles was demonstrated.[16] The
behavior of such bioreactors is relatively straightforward; contrarily,
SGCs that regulate protein expression through feedback systems are
much more relevant to constructing an artificial cell. A recently
developed TX-TL system employing all seven regulatory Escherichia
coli σ factors has enabled the construction of more
extensive SGCs with complex behavior (Figure ). For instance, in serial transcriptional
activation cascades the expression of one σ factor activates
the expression of a subsequent factor, ultimately producing a reporter
protein (Figure A).
Other circuits included AND gates, which require the simultaneous
expression of two σ factors to produce the reporter, pulse circuits,
in which a single factor first induced reporter expression and subsequently
repressed it by a delayed repression pathway (Figure B), inducible transcriptional repression
units that switched between two outputs depending on the inducer used
(Figure C), positive
feedback loops, and biosynthetic metabolite pathways. Some of these
circuits have been constructed in vitro only, others in vesiculo as well.[17,18]
Figure 2
SGCs are examples of
the complex behavior that arises when combining
genetic elements. (A) A serial transcriptional activation cascade
that produces deGFP. Each σ factor activates its successor by
interacting with its promoter, as indicated by solid arrows. (B) This
circuit generates a pulse in deGFP production due to two competing
expression cascades. Addition of σ70 induces deGFP
production by the stimulatory (lower) circuit, but the inhibitory
(upper) circuit is triggered simultaneously and causes a delayed suppression.
(C) An inducible transcriptional repression unit that can switch outputs.
In the presence of IPTG, deCFP is produced; replacement by ATc represses
deCFP production and stimulates deGFP expression. Adapted with permission
from refs (17 and 18). Copyright
2012 and 2016 American Chemical Society.
SGCs are examples of
the complex behavior that arises when combining
genetic elements. (A) A serial transcriptional activation cascade
that produces deGFP. Each σ factor activates its successor by
interacting with its promoter, as indicated by solid arrows. (B) This
circuit generates a pulse in deGFP production due to two competing
expression cascades. Addition of σ70 induces deGFP
production by the stimulatory (lower) circuit, but the inhibitory
(upper) circuit is triggered simultaneously and causes a delayed suppression.
(C) An inducible transcriptional repression unit that can switch outputs.
In the presence of IPTG, deCFP is produced; replacement by ATc represses
deCFP production and stimulates deGFP expression. Adapted with permission
from refs (17 and 18). Copyright
2012 and 2016 American Chemical Society.These examples represent the most extensive SGCs currently
realized
in synthetic compartments. Far more complex behavior, however, like
oscillations and pattern generation, has already been achieved in
bulk systems.[19] Such behavior usually occurs
in a limited parameter space only and, therefore, requires tight control
of the concentrations of all reagents. Unfortunately, most common
techniques for vesicle formation yield a heterogeneous population
of vesicles due to the stochastic nature of the encapsulation of dilute
(macro-)molecules.[20] This heterogeneity
hinders the extent of control over reaction networks in compartments
compared to bulk systems. Microfluidic platforms may provide a solution
here, as they can construct synthetic compartments in a highly controlled
way.A very interesting next step in the programming of artificial
cells
would be the development of a replicating vesicle with strong genotype–phenotype
linkages. That way, the genetic program of an artificial cell can
alter vital biochemical properties, creating a selective pressure
that can be used for directed evolution.[21]
Metabolism and Energy
Many processes constantly require
a supply of building blocks and
energy to maintain their activity. In natural cells, these are partially
supplied by catabolic processes that recycle macromolecules and generate
building blocks and energy-rich compounds like ATP. Most artificial
cells reported to date, however, lack the mechanisms to maintain such
a balance of resources. Therefore, their metabolism usually quickly
grinds to a halt due to depletion of nutrients or accumulation of
waste. Continuous feeding with fresh nutrients temporarily alleviates
this problem,[16] but the activity eventually
decreases due to toxic byproducts or catalyst poisoning.Only
a few attempts to regenerate energy carriers, such as cofactors,
in synthetic cells have been reported. For instance, we have shown
that the natural cofactor NADPH could be regenerated in a polymersome
using a set of enzymes and electron donors.[22] In cell-free protein synthesis, ATP regeneration has received more
attention, resulting in increased protein production times.[23] Although lysate-based artificial cells in principle
contain the machinery to regenerate nutrients, an efficient recycling
of pivotal nutrients and removal of waste is still a distant goal.
In the future, maintaining a supporting metabolism in artificial cells
will become increasingly important when more complicated functions
are pursued and maintaining homeostasis becomes pivotal for prolonged
activity.Analogous to photosynthesis, light would in this respect
be a great
energy source to generate energy-rich intermediates to fuel artificial
cells. Light-powered ATP production using ATP synthase in conjunction
with bacteriorhodopsin or a proton-pumping synthetic system has been
demonstrated in polymersomes and liposomes, repectively.[24,25] Their integration with an artificial cell system has, however, not
been reported until now.
Growth and Division of Synthetic Compartments
Reproduction is essential to maintain a living population. For
this, the artificial cell needs to copy all its vital components and
divide these into daughter compartments. So far, most research has
focused on replication of the (genetic) information carrier, as reviewed
elsewhere.[1] Recently, however, more groups
have started to design artificial cells that produce new membranes
and are capable of division.
Growth
Proliferation of cells requires
the production
of membrane components to prevent shrinkage of each subsequent generation.
Generally, two approaches have been pursued to feed membranes with
additional components. For dynamic membranes, like those based on
fatty acids, externally added membrane components are spontaneously
incorporated.[21] Phospholipid membranes
are less dynamic and require in situ production of
membrane components for efficient incorporation. Polymersomes are
generally even more stable and, therefore, used as nonreplicating
model cells only.An often-adopted approach to generate membrane
components inside an artificial cell comprises the encapsulation of
a catalyst into the membrane or lumen, where it produces an amphiphilic
molecule that is incorporated into the membrane. Typically, this membrane
growth disturbs the compartment’s surface-to-volume ratio,
which induces budding and fission (Figure ).[26] A problem
in these systems, however, is the dilution of the catalyst after several
rounds of growth and fission. To circumvent this problem, Devaraj
and co-workers created a catalyst that can both generate new membrane
components and undergo autocatalysis.[27] Their system could perform 15 cycles of near-complete conversion
of lipid precursors that produced many new vesicles.
Figure 3
Self-reproduction of
vesicles coupled to internal DNA amplification.
A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the vesicle’s lumen amplifies
the encapsulated DNA, and a catalyst in the membrane generates new
membrane components from supplemented precursors. Importantly, the
DNA accelerates membrane formation and induces budding and fission
of the vesicle. Adapted with permission from refs (26 and 29). Copyright 2011 Macmillan Publishers
Ltd.
Self-reproduction of
vesicles coupled to internal DNA amplification.
A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the vesicle’s lumen amplifies
the encapsulated DNA, and a catalyst in the membrane generates new
membrane components from supplemented precursors. Importantly, the
DNA accelerates membrane formation and induces budding and fission
of the vesicle. Adapted with permission from refs (26 and 29). Copyright 2011 Macmillan Publishers
Ltd.To sustain a functional metabolism
after division, however, the
essential metabolic machinery should be replicated too. So far, little
development has been realized in this area. Recently, however, an
example of maintaining homeostasis upon growth of the compartment
was demonstrated.[28] Rather than replicating
the encapsulated catalyst, it was activated due to dilution of its
inhibitors upon growth of the compartment. Although such regulation
was demonstrated for vesicle growth only, it is an interesting step
toward maintaining homeostasis upon division. For future efforts,
it is important that the replication of the information carrier and
the compartment become coupled, to produce new generations with the
same hereditary information. The work by Sugawara (Figure ) has already provided an interesting
approach to this challenge.[26] Subsequently,
the occurrence of small changes to the hereditary code and their subsequent
propagation in the population can pave the way for evolution of such
artificial life.
Division
Although the division of
artificial cells
is still far removed from the stringent control over this process
found in nature, numerous studies have reported basic methods of division
(fission or budding) in artificial cells. The divisions were instigated
by external mechanical shearing,[30] membrane
growth,[26,27] volume reduction,[31] or phase separation.[31] Frequently, an
increased surface-to-volume ratio due to membrane growth makes spontaneous
budding and fission thermodynamically favorable.[32] Indeed, sustained membrane growth can fuel repetitive growth/division
cycles of artificial cells, albeit with limited control over the divisions.[27,30] Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated that macromolecules
can provide some control over division by interacting with the growing
membrane.[26,32]To gain more spatiotemporal control
over synthetic division cycles, several groups have used regulatory
elements from nature, like proteins that play a pivotal role in the
division of simple bacteria, to divide artificial cells. Most notably,
the FtsZ and Min proteins from E. coli have been
reconstituted into artificial cells to achieve controlled division.[33] Recently, some evidence was presented that a
contractile Z-ring formed by FtsZ and FtsA could completely pinch
off and divide an artificial cell.[34] Although
such strategies could provide much better spatiotemporal control over
the division process, their drawback is that the regulatory function
of these protein networks is difficult to reproduce ex cellulo. The need to move toward more complicated division machinery is,
however, obvious, since the field still faces major challenges here,
like equal distribution of genetic information upon division, and
implementing adequate checkpoints in the cell cycle.
Adaptivity
Many of the artificial cells developed over the past years can
be used to study processes in isolation and under controlled conditions.
In the previous sections, we reviewed such systems in our discussion
of the first four characteristics of life we introduced earlier: (i)
compartment, (ii) information carrier, (iii) metabolism, and (iv)
reproduction. To survive in a dynamic environment, however, cells
have to continuously sense and respond to changes in their milieu.
Here, we examine efforts to mimic such adaptivity in artificial cells
that dynamically respond to their environment or each other and discuss
our recent work on nanomotors that use fuel from their surroundings
to move.
Sensing the Environment
We recently developed a giant
vesicle in which protein–ligand interactions were reversibly
controlled by the addition of external small molecule triggers.[35] The interaction of a His-tagged protein with
its ligand in the membrane of giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) was
regulated by the activity of a pH-modifying enzyme, alcohol dehydrogenase
(ADH) (Figure ). The
pH inside the GUV depended on the redox equilibrium of the natural
cofactor NAD(H), which was reduced or oxidized by ADH in the presence
of isopropanol or acetone, respectively. Thus, addition of either
substrate could change the pH inside the GUVs, altering the association
of protein to the membrane. Importantly, this process could be reversed
by replacement of the original substrate by its antagonist. Hence,
this artificial cell provides a platform to drive the dynamic membrane
association and dissociation of any His-tagged biomolecule. Additionally,
the covalent addition of targeted proteins to lipid membranes with
spatiotemporal control has recently been reported as well.[36] Such platforms are especially useful for studying
proteins that change conformation or that form functional complexes
upon membrane association.
Figure 4
Reversible assembly of a His-tagged protein
on the membrane of
a GUV. The assembly is driven by the catalytic activity of ADH, which
changes the pH of the vesicle’s lumen. (A) Schematic of the
reversible assembly. (B) Alternating addition of two substrates (indicated
by arrows) drives membrane assembly and disassembly of the His-tagged
protein. (C) Fluorescence microscopy images of GUVs corresponding
to the time points in panel B. Adapted with permission from ref (35). Copyright 2015 Wiley.
Reversible assembly of a His-tagged protein
on the membrane of
a GUV. The assembly is driven by the catalytic activity of ADH, which
changes the pH of the vesicle’s lumen. (A) Schematic of the
reversible assembly. (B) Alternating addition of two substrates (indicated
by arrows) drives membrane assembly and disassembly of the His-tagged
protein. (C) Fluorescence microscopy images of GUVs corresponding
to the time points in panel B. Adapted with permission from ref (35). Copyright 2015 Wiley.Whereas natural cells can alter
their membrane composition to regulate
signaling or binding, synthetic membranes are usually static. Devaraj
et al. addressed this discrepancy using a reversible native chemical
ligation strategy to create lipid analogs that can easily exchange
their acyl chains and hydrophilic head groups. The lipids self-assembled
into GUVs, after which they could exchange their tails and head groups
by addition of reactive precursors to the GUV solution. This way,
the GUV’s membrane composition was remodeled to induce the
formation of lipid domains, as well as to recruit a protein through
electrostatic interactions with a newly introduced lipid headgroup.[37]Not only the composition but also the
shape of natural cells is
dynamic; their morphology can change upon external or internal triggers.
In an effort to translate this property to synthetic compartments,
polymersomes and colloidosomes were shown to undergo oscillatory shape
deformations in response to temperature variations and an internal
oscillatory reaction (Figure ).[38,39]
Figure 5
Oscillating buckling patterns observed
for two colloidosomes in
response to temperature variations and an internal oscillating reaction.
Reproduced with permission from ref (39). Copyright 2016 Wiley.
Oscillating buckling patterns observed
for two colloidosomes in
response to temperature variations and an internal oscillating reaction.
Reproduced with permission from ref (39). Copyright 2016 Wiley.These examples show the range of possibilities for creating
adaptive
artificial cells. Currently, the efforts seem to lack a clear main
objective, and groups are just exploring some curious designs. An
important goal would be the modulation of membrane permeability upon
an external or internal stimulus. The Mann group already showed they
could influence the membrane permeability of a colloidosome sufficiently
to regulate an internal reaction.[40] Preferably
though, the uptake should be more selective than just based on size
or charge. For this, activatable membrane channels could be a very
interesting option. Additionally, sensing signals from other cells
and converting a chemical fuel into motion are very interesting cases
of adaptivity that will be discussed below.
Communication between Cells
Cells actively communicate
to coordinate their actions not only in multicellular but also in
unicellular organisms. Efforts to mimic this behavior comprise artificial
communication between both natural and artificial cells. Here we limit
ourselves to systems that involve artificial cells.The first
artificial cell capable of communicating with a natural cell used
formaldehyde and boric acid as a simple feedstock to generate a variety
of sugar derivatives.[41] Due to the similarity
of these borates to an inducer of bioluminescence in the bacterium Vibrio harveyi, the artificial cells could signal the bacterium
to produce light. More recently, protocell-to-cell signaling was also
engineered such that artificial cells translated a chemical compound
that E. coli cannot sense to a signaling molecule
that triggered a cellular response in the bacteria.[42]Few systems comprising signaling between two artificial
cells have
been reported.[43,44] In one example, the Mann group
engineered one-way signaling from a hydrogen peroxide-producing colloidosome
to a secondary colloidosome. The hydrogen peroxide triggered formation
of an outer shell of thermoresponsive PNIPAM on the secondary colloidosome.
This new shell altered the colloidosome’s permeability, which
influenced the rate of an enclosed enzymatic reaction (Figure ).[43] The same group also engineered interesting predatory behavior in
communities of artificial cells. Coacervate droplets could seek and
attack protein-based vesicles and, after lysing them, hijack their
contents.[45]
Figure 6
Colloidosome signaling.
(A) A glucose oxidase (GOx)-filled colloidosome
produces hydrogen peroxide, which induces polymerization of the NIPAM
shell of a secondary colloidosome. Consequently, the permeability
of the PNIPAM-colloidosome becomes thermoresponsive, influencing the
kinetics of an internal reaction. (B) Fluorescence microcopy image
of red fluorescent GOx-colloidosomes that induced the polymerization
of a green fluorescent shell around a PNIPAM-colloidosome. (C) Kinetics
of an enzymatic reaction inside the PNIPAM-colloidosomes before (black)
and after (red) polymerization of the NIPAM shell. Adapted with permission
from ref (43). Copyright
2016 Wiley.
Colloidosome signaling.
(A) A glucose oxidase (GOx)-filled colloidosome
produces hydrogen peroxide, which induces polymerization of the NIPAM
shell of a secondary colloidosome. Consequently, the permeability
of the PNIPAM-colloidosome becomes thermoresponsive, influencing the
kinetics of an internal reaction. (B) Fluorescence microcopy image
of red fluorescent GOx-colloidosomes that induced the polymerization
of a green fluorescent shell around a PNIPAM-colloidosome. (C) Kinetics
of an enzymatic reaction inside the PNIPAM-colloidosomes before (black)
and after (red) polymerization of the NIPAM shell. Adapted with permission
from ref (43). Copyright
2016 Wiley.Despite these recent
examples, interactions between artificial
cells remain a relatively unexplored part of the field. As such, the
current designs are mere primitive versions of the complex communication
that exists between natural cells. Reciprocal communication between
two artificial cells, for example, has not yet been demonstrated.
Such mutual regulation between artificial cells could form the basis
for the design of communities that can coordinate their actions, for
instance, to maintain homeostasis. As such, the behavior of communities
of artificial cells merits further research because it represents
the first steps to the bottom-up synthesis of tissue-like organizations.
Motility and Chemotaxis
Nature offers plenty examples
of the importance of motility for natural cells. Many of these trajectories
follow a chemical gradient, in a process known as chemotaxis. So far,
however, in synthetic cell-like compartments active and directed motility
has seldom been produced. Such systems would not only yield insight
in the movement of natural cells but also pose interesting platforms
for drug delivery as smart materials that can migrate to specific
chemical milieus.Synthetic compartments can be propelled by
a magnetic, acoustic, or electric field, light, or a chemical fuel.
Using a chemical fuel has the advantage that no external force is
needed to drive propulsion. However, the examples of fuel-driven propulsion
of micro- and nanomotors that have been reported are mostly very different
from cell-like structures.[46] Our group
has used bowl-shaped polymeric vesicles, termed stomatocytes, that
are propelled by an encapsulated hydrogen peroxide-consuming catalyst
(Figure ).[47] These nanomotors are obtained by controlled
deformation of polymersomes, during which catalytic species such as
enzymes are encapsulated in their cavity to catalyze the decomposition
of fuel molecules like glucose and hydrogen peroxide.[48] The nanomotors were shown to move in a directed manner
in the presence of fuel, which is thought to be caused by a combination
of diffusiophoresis and oxygen bubble formation.[47]
Figure 7
Glucose-fueled propulsion of enzyme-loaded stomatocytes. (A) The
nanomotor’s cavity is loaded with enzymes during self-assembly.
Fuel can diffuse in, but the enzymes remain trapped, producing thrust.
(B) The nanomotors’ speed varies with glucose concentration.
Adapted with permission from ref (48). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Glucose-fueled propulsion of enzyme-loaded stomatocytes. (A) The
nanomotor’s cavity is loaded with enzymes during self-assembly.
Fuel can diffuse in, but the enzymes remain trapped, producing thrust.
(B) The nanomotors’ speed varies with glucose concentration.
Adapted with permission from ref (48). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.To demonstrate life-like behavior,
synthetic motor systems should
also show chemotactic characteristics. Until now, however, the number
of motors demonstrating guided movement to an attractant is limited.[49] Mainly, they are based on bimetallic particles
or metal-coated microspheres. We recently created a more cell-like
chemotactic system based on stomatocytes. The nanomotors moved along
gradients of hydrogen peroxide, which could even direct them toward
hydrogen peroxide-producing neutrophils.[50] This chemotactic behavior is thought to result from the longer distances
traveled at high fuel concentrations due to a fuel concentration-dependent
increase in speed. Currently, we are investigating whether the speed,
directionality, and temporal behavior of such chemotactic nanomotors
can be further controlled. For instance, we have created nanomotors
that use an enzymatic reaction network with several feedforward loops
to maintain a constant speed independent of fuel concentration.[51]
Conclusions and Outlook
During the
past decade, the bottom-up construction of artificial
cells has started to pick up steam. Prominent advances in their functionality
include the construction of gene circuits that display increasingly
complex behavior and of self-reproducing compartments with improved
control over their division. An important recent development is the
construction of artificial cells that are adaptive. Their dynamic
nature and ability to interact with the environment are significant
next steps in the realization of fully autonomous artificial cells.For future developments, it is important to ensure that life-like
systems are provided with an effective metabolism to sustain the biomimetic
processes performed within the compartment. Furthermore, strategies
should be designed that allow the replication of not only the genetic
information or the membrane components, but also the functional units
that execute the biomimetic processes. A first step in this direction
would be integrating advanced functional elements while maintaining
their mutual compatibility. In this regard, accommodating the relatively
static multicompartmentalized vesicle platforms currently developed
with the functionality and adaptivity realized in other systems seems
a promising strategy. Additionally, communication between artificial
cells would open up interesting avenues to collective behavior inspired
by bacterial colonies or multicellular organisms. Taking adaptivity
a step further, artificial cells would also provide an interesting
platform to study the principles of genetic evolution.Finally,
the bottom-up construction of artificial cells will not
only enhance our understanding of fundamental physical and chemical
processes in living systems but may also find applications in biomedicine
and environmental science via the development of smart, autonomous
microreactors that can monitor their environment and intervene if
necessary.
Authors: Loai K E A Abdelmohsen; Marlies Nijemeisland; Gajanan M Pawar; Geert-Jan A Janssen; Roeland J M Nolte; Jan C M van Hest; Daniela A Wilson Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Michael D Hardy; Jun Yang; Jangir Selimkhanov; Christian M Cole; Lev S Tsimring; Neal K Devaraj Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ruud J R W Peters; Maïté Marguet; Sébastien Marais; Marco W Fraaije; Jan C M van Hest; Sébastien Lecommandoux Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Justin A Peruzzi; Miranda L Jacobs; Timothy Q Vu; Kenneth S Wang; Neha P Kamat Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 15.336