Michael Messerli1,2, Thomas Kluckert3, Meinhard Knitel3, Stephan Wälti3,4, Lotus Desbiolles3, Fabian Rengier5, René Warschkow6, Ralf W Bauer3, Hatem Alkadhi7, Sebastian Leschka3,7, Simon Wildermuth3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Ramistrasse, Zurich, Switzerland. michael.messerli@usz.ch. 2. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. michael.messerli@usz.ch. 3. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. 4. Department of Radiology, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland. 7. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of ultralow radiation dose CT of the chest with tin filtration at 100 kV for pulmonary nodule detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 202 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated chest CT (standard dose, 1.8 ± 0.7 mSv) were prospectively included and additionally scanned with an ultralow dose protocol (0.13 ± 0.01 mSv). Standard dose CT was read in consensus by two board-certified radiologists to determine the presence of lung nodules and served as standard of reference (SOR). Two radiologists assessed the presence of lung nodules and their locations on ultralow dose CT. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultralow dose protocol was compared against the SOR, including subgroup analyses of different nodule sizes and types. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to test for independent predictors for sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection. RESULTS: 425 nodules (mean diameter 3.7 ± 2.9 mm) were found on SOR. Overall sensitivity for nodule detection by ultralow dose CT was 91%. In multivariate analysis, nodule type, size and patients BMI were independent predictors for sensitivity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultralow dose chest CT at 100 kV with spectral shaping enables a high sensitivity for the detection of pulmonary nodules at exposure levels comparable to plain film chest X-ray. KEYPOINTS: • 91% of all lung nodules were detected with ultralow dose CT • Sensitivity for subsolid nodule detection is lower in ultralow dose CT (77.5%) • The mean effective radiation dose in 202 patients was 0.13 mSv • Ultralow dose CT seems to be feasible for lung cancer screening.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of ultralow radiation dose CT of the chest with tin filtration at 100 kV for pulmonary nodule detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 202 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated chest CT (standard dose, 1.8 ± 0.7 mSv) were prospectively included and additionally scanned with an ultralow dose protocol (0.13 ± 0.01 mSv). Standard dose CT was read in consensus by two board-certified radiologists to determine the presence of lung nodules and served as standard of reference (SOR). Two radiologists assessed the presence of lung nodules and their locations on ultralow dose CT. Sensitivity and specificity of the ultralow dose protocol was compared against the SOR, including subgroup analyses of different nodule sizes and types. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to test for independent predictors for sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection. RESULTS: 425 nodules (mean diameter 3.7 ± 2.9 mm) were found on SOR. Overall sensitivity for nodule detection by ultralow dose CT was 91%. In multivariate analysis, nodule type, size and patients BMI were independent predictors for sensitivity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultralow dose chest CT at 100 kV with spectral shaping enables a high sensitivity for the detection of pulmonary nodules at exposure levels comparable to plain film chest X-ray. KEYPOINTS: • 91% of all lung nodules were detected with ultralow dose CT • Sensitivity for subsolid nodule detection is lower in ultralow dose CT (77.5%) • The mean effective radiation dose in 202 patients was 0.13 mSv • Ultralow dose CT seems to be feasible for lung cancer screening.
Authors: Stephan Baumueller; Anna Winklehner; Christoph Karlo; Robert Goetti; Thomas Flohr; Erich W Russi; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Priyanka Prakash; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jeanne B Ackman; Subba R Digumarthy; Jiang Hsieh; Synho Do; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Matthew D Gilman Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Adrian Huber; Julia Landau; Lukas Ebner; Yanik Bütikofer; Lars Leidolt; Barbara Brela; Michelle May; Johannes Heverhagen; Andreas Christe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: David M Hansell; Alexander A Bankier; Heber MacMahon; Theresa C McLoud; Nestor L Müller; Jacques Remy Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ying Ru Zhao; Xueqian Xie; Harry J de Koning; Willem P Mali; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Cancer Imaging Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 3.909
Authors: Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Christian Mikat; Axel Wetter; Nika Guberina; Ahmed Salem; Philipp Heil; Michael Forsting; Kai Nassenstein Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael Messerli; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sebastian Leschka; René Warschkow; Simon Wildermuth; Lukas Hechelhammer; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Matthias Wetzl; Matthias S May; Daniel Weinmann; Matthias Hammon; Christoph Treutlein; Martin Zeilinger; Alexander Kiefer; Regina Trollmann; Joachim Woelfle; Michael Uder; Oliver Rompel Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2020-06-17
Authors: Bo Liu; Jie Fang; Haipeng Jia; Zhigang Sun; Jian Liao; Hong Meng; Fengmin Pan; Chunhai Li Journal: Thorac Cancer Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Carolin Sophie Reidelbach; Sebastian Moritz Goerke; Simon Carl Leschka; Claudia Neubauer; Martin Soschynski; Florian Lampert; Horst Zajonc; Elmar Kotter; Mathias Langer; Jakob Neubauer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240