Michael Messerli1,2, Andreas A Giannopoulos1, Sebastian Leschka2,3, René Warschkow4, Simon Wildermuth2, Lukas Hechelhammer2,3, Ralf W Bauer2. 1. 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich , Zürich , Switzerland. 2. 2 Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen , St. Gallen , Switzerland. 3. 3 Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland. 4. 4 Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen , St. Gallen , Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of ultralow-dose chest CT for estimating the calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta using tin-filter CT and compare its diagnostic accuracy with chest direct radiography. METHODS: A total of 106 patients from a prospective, IRB-approved single-centre study were included and underwent standard dose chest CT (1.7 ± 0.7 mSv) by clinical indication followed by ultralow-dose CT with 100 kV and spectral shaping by a tin filter (0.13 ± 0.01 mSv) to achieve chest X-ray equivalent dose in the same session. Two independent radiologists reviewed the CT images, rated image quality and estimated presence and extent of calcification of aortic valve, ascending aorta and aortic arch. Conventional radiographs were also reviewed for presence of aortic calcifications. RESULTS: The sensitivity of ultralow-dose CT for the detection of calcifications of the aortic valve, ascending aorta and aortic arch was 93.5, 96.2 and 96.2%, respectively, compared with standard dose CT. The sensitivity for the detection of thoracic aortic calcification was significantly lower on chest X-ray (52.3%) compared with ultralow-dose CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A reliable estimation of calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta can be achieved with modern tin-filter CT at dose values comparable to chest direct radiography. Advances in knowledge: Our findings suggest that ultralow-dose CT is an excellent tool for assessing the calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta with higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional chest radiography and importantly without the additional cost of increased radiation dose.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of ultralow-dose chest CT for estimating the calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta using tin-filter CT and compare its diagnostic accuracy with chest direct radiography. METHODS: A total of 106 patients from a prospective, IRB-approved single-centre study were included and underwent standard dose chest CT (1.7 ± 0.7 mSv) by clinical indication followed by ultralow-dose CT with 100 kV and spectral shaping by a tin filter (0.13 ± 0.01 mSv) to achieve chest X-ray equivalent dose in the same session. Two independent radiologists reviewed the CT images, rated image quality and estimated presence and extent of calcification of aortic valve, ascending aorta and aortic arch. Conventional radiographs were also reviewed for presence of aortic calcifications. RESULTS: The sensitivity of ultralow-dose CT for the detection of calcifications of the aortic valve, ascending aorta and aortic arch was 93.5, 96.2 and 96.2%, respectively, compared with standard dose CT. The sensitivity for the detection of thoracic aortic calcification was significantly lower on chest X-ray (52.3%) compared with ultralow-dose CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A reliable estimation of calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta can be achieved with modern tin-filter CT at dose values comparable to chest direct radiography. Advances in knowledge: Our findings suggest that ultralow-dose CT is an excellent tool for assessing the calcified atherosclerotic burden of the thoracic aorta with higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional chest radiography and importantly without the additional cost of increased radiation dose.
Authors: S Sylivris; P Calafiore; G Matalanis; A Rosalion; H P Yuen; B F Buxton; A M Tonkin Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Kay-Hyun Park; Hae Young Lee; Cheong Lim; Eui Suk Chung; Sook-Whan Sung; Sang Il Choi; Eun Ju Chun Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Michael Messerli; Thorsten Ottilinger; René Warschkow; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Simon Wildermuth; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Michael Messerli; Fabian Rengier; Lotus Desbiolles; Niklas F Ehl; Ralf W Bauer; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Simon Wildermuth; Claas P Nähle Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Annemarie M den Harder; Linda M de Heer; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Bela Merkely; Pim A de Jong; Marco Das; G Ardine de Wit; Tim Leiner; Ricardo P J Budde Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2016-01-30
Authors: Jan Bucerius; Jan F Gummert; Michael A Borger; Thomas Walther; Nicolas Doll; Jörg F Onnasch; Sebastian Metz; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Annemarie M den Harder; Linda M de Heer; Ronald C A Meijer; Marco Das; Gabriel P Krestin; Jos G Maessen; Ad J J C Bogers; Pim A de Jong; Tim Leiner; Ricardo P J Budde Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 3.528