Literature DB >> 29651767

Radiation burden and associated cancer risk for a typical population to be screened for lung cancer with low-dose CT: A phantom study.

Kostas Perisinakis1, Ioannis Seimenis2,3, Antonis Tzedakis4, Apostolos Karantanas5, John Damilakis6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate (a) organ doses and organ-specific radiation-induced cancer risk from a single low-dose CT (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) and (b) the theoretical cumulative risk of radiation-induced cancer for a typical cohort to be subjected to repeated annual LCS LDCT.
METHODS: Sex- and body size-specific organ dose data from scan projection radiography (SPR) and helical CT exposures involved in LCS 256-slice LDCT were determined using Monte Carlo methods. Theoretical life attributable risk (LAR) of radiogenic cancer from a single 256-slice chest LDCT at age 55-80 years and the cumulative LAR of cancer from repeated annual LDCT studies up to age 80 years were estimated and compared to corresponding nominal lifetime intrinsic risks (LIRs) of being diagnosed with cancer.
RESULTS: The effective dose from LCS 256-slice LDCT was estimated to be 0.71 mSv. SPR was found to contribute 6-12 % to the total effective dose from chest LDCT. The radiation-cancer LAR from a single LDCT study was found to increase the nominal LIR of cancer in average-size 55-year-old males and females by 0.008 % and 0.018 %, respectively. Cumulative radiogenic risk of cancer from repeated annual scans from the age of 55-80 years was found to increase the nominal LIR of cancer by 0.13 % in males and 0.30 % in females.
CONCLUSION: Modern scanners may offer sub-millisievert LCS LDCT. Cumulative radiation risk from repeated annual 256-slice LDCT LCS examinations was found to minimally aggravate the lifetime intrinsic cancer risk of a typical screening population. KEY POINTS: • Effective dose from lung cancer screening low-dose CT may be <1 mSv. • Screening with modern low-dose CT minimally aggravates lifetime cancer induction intrinsic risk. • Dosimetry of lung cancer screening low-dose CT should encounter the radiation burden from the localizing scan projection radiography. • DLP method may underestimate effective dose from low-dose chest CT by 27 %.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Lung cancer; Multidetector computed tomography; Radiation exposure; Radiation-induced cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29651767     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5373-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

1.  The relationship of cancer characteristics and patient outcome with time to lung cancer diagnosis after an abnormal screening CT.

Authors:  Sushilkumar K Sonavane; Paul Pinsky; Jubal Watts; David S Gierada; Reginald Munden; Satinder P Singh; Hrudaya Nath
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT.

Authors:  Paul D Deak; Oliver Langner; Michael Lell; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Screening for lung cancer using sub-millisievert chest CT with iterative reconstruction algorithm: image quality and nodule detectability.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Weiwei Qi; Ye Sun; Yan Jiang; Xiaoyi Liu; Nan Hong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Early Results of Lung Cancer Screening and Radiation Dose Assessment by Low-dose CT at a Community Hospital.

Authors:  Corbin D Jacobs; Mary Ellen Jafari
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; Jonathan D Clapp; Kathy L Clingan; Ilana F Gareen; David A Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

7.  Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Cancer screening with CT: dose controversy.

Authors:  Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  ESR/ERS white paper on lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Lorenzo Bonomo; Mina Gaga; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Nir Peled; Mathias Prokop; Martine Remy-Jardin; Oyunbileg von Stackelberg; Jean-Paul Sculier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Cristiano Rampinelli; Paolo De Marco; Daniela Origgi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Monica Casiraghi; Giulia Veronesi; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-02-08
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Latest CT technologies in lung cancer screening: protocols and radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Marleen Vonder; Monique D Dorrius; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02

2.  Cost-effectiveness and health impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for never smokers in Japan and the United States: a modelling study.

Authors:  Akiko Kowada
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  Image Quality and Pulmonary Nodule Detectability at Low-dose Computed Tomography (low kVp and mAs): A phantom study.

Authors:  Sepideh Iranmakani; Amir Reza Jahanshahi; Parinaz Mehnati; Tohid Mortezazadeh; Davood Khezerloo
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2021-12-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.