Matthias S May1, Michael Brand1, Michael M Lell1, Martin Sedlmair2, Thomas Allmendinger2, Michael Uder1, Wolfgang Wuest3. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. wolfgang.wuest@uk-erlangen.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Spectral shaping aims to narrow the X-ray spectrum of clinical CT. The aim of this study was to determine the image quality and the extent of radiation dose reduction that can be achieved by tin prefiltration for parasinus CT. METHODS: All scans were performed with a third generation dual-source CT scanner. A study protocol was designed using 100 kV tube voltage with tin prefiltration (200 mAs) that provides image noise levels comparable to a low-dose reference protocol using 100 kV without spectral shaping (25 mAs). One hundred consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to the study or control group. All patients signed written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and applies to the HIPAA. Subjective and objective image quality (attenuation values, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) were assessed. Radiation exposure was assessed as volumetric CT dose index, and effective dose was estimated. Mann-Whitney U test was performed for radiation exposure and for image noise comparison. RESULTS: All scans were of diagnostic image quality. Image noise in air, in the retrobulbar fat, and in the eye globe was comparable between both groups (all p > 0.05). CNReye globe/air did not differ significantly between both groups (p = 0.7). Radiation exposure (1.7 vs. 2.1 mGy, p < 0.01) and effective dose (0.055 vs. 0.066 mSv, p < 0.01) were significantly reduced in the study group. CONCLUSION: Radiation dose can be further reduced by 17% for low-dose parasinus CT by tin prefiltration maintaining diagnostic image quality.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Spectral shaping aims to narrow the X-ray spectrum of clinical CT. The aim of this study was to determine the image quality and the extent of radiation dose reduction that can be achieved by tin prefiltration for parasinus CT. METHODS: All scans were performed with a third generation dual-source CT scanner. A study protocol was designed using 100 kV tube voltage with tin prefiltration (200 mAs) that provides image noise levels comparable to a low-dose reference protocol using 100 kV without spectral shaping (25 mAs). One hundred consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to the study or control group. All patients signed written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and applies to the HIPAA. Subjective and objective image quality (attenuation values, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) were assessed. Radiation exposure was assessed as volumetric CT dose index, and effective dose was estimated. Mann-Whitney U test was performed for radiation exposure and for image noise comparison. RESULTS: All scans were of diagnostic image quality. Image noise in air, in the retrobulbar fat, and in the eye globe was comparable between both groups (all p > 0.05). CNReye globe/air did not differ significantly between both groups (p = 0.7). Radiation exposure (1.7 vs. 2.1 mGy, p < 0.01) and effective dose (0.055 vs. 0.066 mSv, p < 0.01) were significantly reduced in the study group. CONCLUSION: Radiation dose can be further reduced by 17% for low-dose parasinus CT by tin prefiltration maintaining diagnostic image quality.
Entities:
Keywords:
Parasinus CT; Spectral shaping; Tin filtration
Authors: Michael M Lell; Joachim E Wildberger; Hatem Alkadhi; John Damilakis; Marc Kachelriess Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Michael M Lell; Matthias May; Paul Deak; Sedat Alibek; Michael Kuefner; Axel Kuettner; Henrik Köhler; Stephan Achenbach; Michael Uder; Tanja Radkow Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Nico Buls; Gert Van Gompel; Toon Van Cauteren; Koenraad Nieboer; Inneke Willekens; Guy Verfaillie; Paul Evans; Sven Macholl; Ben Newton; Johan de Mey Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-11-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthias Wetzl; Matthias S May; Daniel Weinmann; Matthias Hammon; Christoph Treutlein; Martin Zeilinger; Alexander Kiefer; Regina Trollmann; Joachim Woelfle; Michael Uder; Oliver Rompel Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2020-06-17
Authors: Su Min Lee; Hye Jung Choo; Sun Joo Lee; Sung Kwan Kim; In Sook Lee; Dong Wook Kim; Jin Wook Baek; Young Jin Heo Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: M Kopp; M Wetzl; F Geissler; J P Roth; R Wallner; D Hoefler; S Faby; T Allmendinger; P Amarteifio; W Wuest; A Cavallaro; M Uder; M S May Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Matthias May; Rafael Heiss; Julia Koehnen; Matthias Wetzl; Marco Wiesmueller; Christoph Treutlein; Lars Braeuer; Michael Uder; Markus Kopp Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 6.016