Ji Young Ha1, Hye Jin Baek1,2, Kyeong Hwa Ryu1, Eun Cho1. 1. Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the setting of multiple trauma, radiation exposure is considered a relevant issue because patients may require repeated imaging to evaluate injuries in different body parts. Recently, spectral shaping of the X-ray beam has been shown to be beneficial in reducing radiation exposure. We investigated the clinical feasibility of a tin-filtered 100 kV protocol for the diagnostic use, compared to routine dedicated maxillofacial CT at 120 kVp in patients with craniofacial trauma; we assessed the image quality, radiation dose, and interobserver agreement. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 100 consecutive patients who underwent dedicated maxillofacial CT for craniofacial trauma. Fifty patients were examined with a tin-filtered 100 kV protocol performed using a third-generation dual source CT. The other 50 patients were examined with a standard protocol on a different scanner. Two readers independently evaluated image quality subjectively and objectively, and the interobserver agreement was also assessed. CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded to compare radiation exposure. A quality-control phantom was also scanned to prospectively assess the impact of tin filtration. RESULTS: All CT scans showed diagnostic image quality for evaluating craniofacial fractures. The tin-filtered 100 kV protocol showed sufficient-to-good image quality for diagnostic use; however, overall image quality and anatomic delineation from the tin-filtered 100 kV protocol were significantly lower than from the standard protocol. Interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect (k=0.56-0.85). Image noises in the air, eye globe, and retrobulbar fat were comparable between the two protocols (P>0.05), whereas both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio in the eye globe and retrobulbar fat showed a significant difference (P<0.05). The tin-filtered 100 kV protocol showed a significant reduction in radiation dose compared to the standard protocol: CTDIvol, 3.33 vs. 30.5 mGy (P<0.001); and DLP, 70.70 vs. 669.43 mGy*cm (P<0.001). The phantom study also demonstrated a lower radiation dose for the tin-filter 100 kV protocol compared to the standard protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated maxillofacial CT using spectral shaping with tin filtration can allow a significant reduction in radiation dose while maintaining sufficient diagnostic image quality, when compared to the standard protocol. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In the setting of multiple trauma, radiation exposure is considered a relevant issue because patients may require repeated imaging to evaluate injuries in different body parts. Recently, spectral shaping of the X-ray beam has been shown to be beneficial in reducing radiation exposure. We investigated the clinical feasibility of a tin-filtered 100 kV protocol for the diagnostic use, compared to routine dedicated maxillofacial CT at 120 kVp in patients with craniofacial trauma; we assessed the image quality, radiation dose, and interobserver agreement. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 100 consecutive patients who underwent dedicated maxillofacial CT for craniofacial trauma. Fifty patients were examined with a tin-filtered 100 kV protocol performed using a third-generation dual source CT. The other 50 patients were examined with a standard protocol on a different scanner. Two readers independently evaluated image quality subjectively and objectively, and the interobserver agreement was also assessed. CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded to compare radiation exposure. A quality-control phantom was also scanned to prospectively assess the impact of tin filtration. RESULTS: All CT scans showed diagnostic image quality for evaluating craniofacial fractures. The tin-filtered 100 kV protocol showed sufficient-to-good image quality for diagnostic use; however, overall image quality and anatomic delineation from the tin-filtered 100 kV protocol were significantly lower than from the standard protocol. Interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect (k=0.56-0.85). Image noises in the air, eye globe, and retrobulbar fat were comparable between the two protocols (P>0.05), whereas both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio in the eye globe and retrobulbar fat showed a significant difference (P<0.05). The tin-filtered 100 kV protocol showed a significant reduction in radiation dose compared to the standard protocol: CTDIvol, 3.33 vs. 30.5 mGy (P<0.001); and DLP, 70.70 vs. 669.43 mGy*cm (P<0.001). The phantom study also demonstrated a lower radiation dose for the tin-filter 100 kV protocol compared to the standard protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated maxillofacial CT using spectral shaping with tin filtration can allow a significant reduction in radiation dose while maintaining sufficient diagnostic image quality, when compared to the standard protocol. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Julian L Wichmann; Andrew D Hardie; U Joseph Schoepf; Lloyd M Felmly; Jonathan D Perry; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Christian Canstein; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthias S May; Michael Brand; Michael M Lell; Martin Sedlmair; Thomas Allmendinger; Michael Uder; Wolfgang Wuest Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Meike Weis; Thomas Henzler; John W Nance; Holger Haubenreisser; Mathias Meyer; Sonja Sudarski; Stefan O Schoenberg; K Wolfgang Neff; Claudia Hagelstein Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Franziska M Braun; Thorsten R C Johnson; Wieland H Sommer; Kolja M Thierfelder; Felix G Meinel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 5.315