Literature DB >> 28090698

Presentation and validation of the DuckEES child and adolescent dynamic facial expressions stimulus set.

Nicole R Giuliani1, John C Flournoy1, Elizabeth J Ivie1, Arielle Von Hippel1, Jennifer H Pfeifer1.   

Abstract

The stimulus sets presently used to study emotion processing are primarily static pictures of individuals (primarily adults) making emotional facial expressions. However, the dynamic, stereotyped movements associated with emotional expressions contain rich information missing from static pictures, such as the difference between happiness and pride. We created a set of 1.1 s dynamic emotional facial stimuli representing boys and girls aged 8-18. A separate group of 36 individuals (mean [M] age = 19.5 years, standard deviation [SD] = 1.95, 13 male) chose the most appropriate emotion label for each video from a superset of 250 videos. Validity and reliability statistics were performed across all stimuli, which were then used to determine which stimuli should be included in the final stimulus set. We set a criterion for inclusion of 70% agreement with the modal response made for each video. The final stimulus set contains 142 videos of 36 actors (M age = 13.24 years, SD = 2.09, 14 male) making negative (disgust, embarrassment, fear, sadness), positive (happiness, pride), and neutral facial expressions. The percent correct among the final stimuli was high (median = 88.89%; M = 88.38%, SD = 7.74%), as was reliability (κ = 0.753).
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children and adolescents; dynamic videos; emotional facial expressions; stimulus set

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28090698      PMCID: PMC6877251          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  21 in total

1.  A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Radim Sara; Michiel Hagendoorn; Oren Marom; Paul Hughett; Larry Macy; Travis Turner; Ruzena Bajcsy; Aaron Posner; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions.

Authors:  Zara Ambadar; Jonathan W Schooler; Jeffrey F Cohn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-05

3.  Development of emotional facial recognition in late childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Laura A Thomas; Michael D De Bellis; Reiko Graham; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-09

4.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  The NIMH Child Emotional Faces Picture Set (NIMH-ChEFS): a new set of children's facial emotion stimuli.

Authors:  Helen Link Egger; Daniel S Pine; Eric Nelson; Ellen Leibenluft; Monique Ernst; Kenneth E Towbin; Adrian Angold
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Biological substrates of emotional reactivity and regulation in adolescence during an emotional go-nogo task.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Nim Tottenham; Adriana Galvan; Henning U Voss; Gary H Glover; B J Casey
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  The social brain in adolescence.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Dynamic perception of facial affect and identity in the human brain.

Authors:  Kevin S LaBar; Michael J Crupain; James T Voyvodic; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Emotions in motion: dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.

Authors:  Sina Alexa Trautmann; Thorsten Fehr; Manfred Herrmann
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  No own-age bias in 3-year-old children: more evidence for the role of early experience in building face-processing biases.

Authors:  Viola Macchi Cassia; Antonella Pisacane; Lucia Gava
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-08-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Presentation and validation of the DuckEES child and adolescent dynamic facial expressions stimulus set.

Authors:  Nicole R Giuliani; John C Flournoy; Elizabeth J Ivie; Arielle Von Hippel; Jennifer H Pfeifer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Neurodevelopmental changes across adolescence in viewing and labeling dynamic peer emotions.

Authors:  Jessica E Flannery; Nicole R Giuliani; John C Flournoy; Jennifer H Pfeifer
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Moderate social sensitivity in a risky context supports adaptive decision making in adolescence: evidence from brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jorien van Hoorn; Ethan M McCormick; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Subjective ratings and emotional recognition of children's facial expressions from the CAFE set.

Authors:  Marília Prada; Margarida V Garrido; Cláudia Camilo; David L Rodrigues
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Complex Emotion Expression Database: A validated stimulus set of trained actors.

Authors:  Margaret S Benda; K Suzanne Scherf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.