Literature DB >> 15869701

Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions.

Zara Ambadar1, Jonathan W Schooler, Jeffrey F Cohn.   

Abstract

Most studies investigating the recognition of facial expressions have focused on static displays of intense expressions. Consequently, researchers may have underestimated the importance of motion in deciphering the subtle expressions that permeate real-life situations. In two experiments, we examined the effect of motion on perception of subtle facial expressions and tested the hypotheses that motion improves affect judgment by (a) providing denser sampling of expressions, (b) providing dynamic information, (c) facilitating configural processing, and (d) enhancing the perception of change. Participants viewed faces depicting subtle facial expressions in four modes (single-static, multi-static, dynamic, and first-last). Experiment 1 demonstrated a robust effect of motion and suggested that this effect was due to the dynamic property of the expression. Experiment 2 showed that the beneficial effect of motion may be due more specifically to its role in perception of change. Together, these experiments demonstrated the importance of motion in identifying subtle facial expressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869701     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  105 in total

1.  Bringing an Ecological Perspective to the Study of Aging and Recognition of Emotional Facial Expressions: Past, Current, and Future Methods.

Authors:  Derek M Isaacowitz; Jennifer Tehan Stanley
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2011-12-01

2.  Recognition of posed and spontaneous dynamic smiles in young and older adults.

Authors:  Nora A Murphy; Jonathan M Lehrfeld; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-12

3.  Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study.

Authors:  Laura M Pönkänen; Annemari Alhoniemi; Jukka M Leppänen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Impacts of Visual Sonority and Handshape Markedness on Second Language Learning of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Joshua T Williams; Sharlene D Newman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-06

5.  Detecting personal familiarity depends on static frames in "thin slices" of behavior.

Authors:  Alyson Saville; Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

6.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions.

Authors:  Cezary Biele; Anna Grabowska
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Direction selectivity in V1 of alert monkeys: evidence for parallel pathways for motion processing.

Authors:  Moshe Gur; D Max Snodderly
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Happy and fearful emotion in cues and targets modulate event-related potential indices of gaze-directed attentional orienting.

Authors:  Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Joseph B Hopfinger; Reiko Graham; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.