Literature DB >> 19501062

Emotions in motion: dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.

Sina Alexa Trautmann1, Thorsten Fehr, Manfred Herrmann.   

Abstract

In social contexts, facial expressions are dynamic in nature and vary rapidly in relation to situational requirements. However, there are very few fMRI studies using dynamic emotional stimuli. The aim of this study was (1) to introduce and evaluate a new stimulus database of static and dynamic emotional facial expressions according to arousal and recognizability investigated by a rating by both participants of the present fMRI study and by an external sample of 30 healthy women, (2) to examine the neural networks involved in emotion perception of static and dynamic facial stimuli separately, and (3) to examine the impact of motion on the emotional processing of dynamic compared to static face stimuli. A total of 16 females participated in the present fMRI study performing a passive emotion perception task including static and dynamic faces of neutral, happy and disgusted expressions. Comparing dynamic stimuli to static faces indicated enhanced emotion-specific brain activation patterns in the parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) including the amygdala (AMG), fusiform gyrus (FG), superior temporal gyrus (STG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and occipital and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). These regions have been discussed to be associated with emotional memory encoding, the perception of threat, facial identity, biological motion, the mirror neuron system, an increase of emotional arousal, and reward processing, respectively. Post hoc ratings of the dynamic stimuli revealed a better recognizability in comparison to the static stimuli. In conclusion, dynamic facial expressions might provide a more appropriate approach to examine the processing of emotional face perception than static stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19501062     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  78 in total

1.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Valence scaling of dynamic facial expressions is altered in high-functioning subjects with autism spectrum disorders: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jukka S Rahko; Jyri-Johan Paakki; Tuomo H Starck; Juha Nikkinen; David L Pauls; Jari V Kätsyri; Eira M Jansson-Verkasalo; Alice S Carter; Tuula M Hurtig; Marja-Leena Mattila; Katja K Jussila; Jukka J Remes; Sanna A Kuusikko-Gauffin; Mikko E Sams; Sven Bölte; Hanna E Ebeling; Irma K Moilanen; Osmo Tervonen; Vesa Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-06

3.  Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Reiko Sawada; Yasutaka Kubota; Sayaka Yoshimura; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  How the visual brain detects emotional changes in facial expressions: Evidence from driven and intrinsic brain oscillations.

Authors:  Rafaela R Campagnoli; Matthias J Wieser; L Forest Gruss; Maeve R Boylan; Lisa M McTeague; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Emotion unfolded by motion: a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Pegah Sarkheil; Rainer Goebel; Frank Schneider; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Temporal lobe structures and facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia patients and nonpsychotic relatives.

Authors:  Vina M Goghari; Angus W Macdonald; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Decoding facial expressions based on face-selective and motion-sensitive areas.

Authors:  Yin Liang; Baolin Liu; Junhai Xu; Gaoyan Zhang; Xianglin Li; Peiyuan Wang; Bin Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Intrinsic functional connectivity underlying successful emotion regulation of angry faces.

Authors:  Carmen Morawetz; Tanja Kellermann; Lydia Kogler; Sina Radke; Jens Blechert; Birgit Derntl
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  DAT by perceived MC interaction on human prefrontal activity and connectivity during emotion processing.

Authors:  Paolo Taurisano; Giuseppe Blasi; Raffaella Romano; Fabio Sambataro; Leonardo Fazio; Barbara Gelao; Gianluca Ursini; Luciana Lo Bianco; Annabella Di Giorgio; Francesca Ferrante; Apostolos Papazacharias; Annamaria Porcelli; Lorenzo Sinibaldi; Teresa Popolizio; Alessandro Bertolino
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Convergent BOLD and Beta-Band Activity in Superior Temporal Sulcus and Frontolimbic Circuitry Underpins Human Emotion Cognition.

Authors:  Mbemba Jabbi; Philip D Kohn; Tiffany Nash; Angela Ianni; Christopher Coutlee; Tom Holroyd; Frederick W Carver; Qiang Chen; Brett Cropp; J Shane Kippenhan; Stephen E Robinson; Richard Coppola; Karen F Berman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.